similar to: package.skeleton generates ".env = <environment>"

If someone is able, can you tell me if there is a better way to do this? More specifically, do I have to rewrite all of the data members stuff and extend stuff of parent class in the child class? See below. Thanks in advance! Example 1: setConstructorS3("ClassA", function(A,x) { if(missing(A))A=15; if(missing(x))x=NA; extend(Object(), "ClassA", .size = A, .x=x

Hi to all members, i have a question about class inheritance and methods using R.oo package: I have the following code and it doesn't work, guess i'm doing smth wrong and there is nothing in the help. library(R.oo) setConstructorS3("ClassA", function(A=15) { extend(Object(), "ClassA", .size = A ); }) setMethodS3("print", "ClassA",

I'd like to suggest that whenever there is no S3 method implementation available for a particular class, that the error message would also report the class structure of the object dispatched on. Example: foo <- function(...) UseMethod("foo") foo.ClassA <- function(object, ...) { cat("foo() for ClassA called.\n") } > foo(structure(1, class="ClassA"))

Hi Eli, Let's say I have a file ClassA.h, that pairs with a file ClassA.cpp to product a library libClassA.a. ClassA.h contains the single declaration. class A {...}; I want to transform it to: #include "ClassB.h" class A : public class B {...}; ClassB.h is the header file for a library libClassB.a built from ClassB.cpp and ClassB.h. I can clearly link libClassB with libClassA.

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 1:42 AM, David Minor<dahvid.minor at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Eli, > Let's say I have a file ClassA.h, that pairs with a file ClassA.cpp > to product a library libClassA.a. > ClassA.h contains the single declaration. > > class A {...}; > > I want to transform it to: > > #include "ClassB.h" > > class A : public class B

Hi! I have implemented class specific behaviour of "[[<-.myclass"<-function(). How it is posible to call the "[[.default" on an object of myclass? Eryk Dipl. bio-chem. Eryk Witold Wolski @ MPI-MG Dep. Vertebrate Genomics Ihnestrasse 73 14195 Berlin 'v' tel: 0049-30-84131285 / \ mail: wolski@molgen.mpg.de ---W-W----

Dear list, It seems that S4 methods defined for an S3 'base' generic are not used in 'base' functions. This can be problematic when 'base' functions start with something like 'as.matrix'. ### START R code setClass("classA", contains = "matrix", representation(realData = "numeric")) setMethod("as.matrix",

On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 1:16 PM, David Minor<dahvid.minor at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm writing a code transformation that involves adding an include to > existing code, adding a base class > to and existing class and then linking with a previously compiled library. > The main problem for me > seems to be how can I add the include?  Can I compile the include alone to > byte

Dear experts, I am learning llvm by reading documents and have a question to ask. The following is the example of code generation that I created. [[a [10.00]] > [3.00]] ; ModuleID = 'ExprF' define i1 @expr(double* %record) { entry: %0 = getelementptr double* %record, i32 0 ; <double*> [#uses=1] %1 = load double* %0 ; <double>

I'm writing a code transformation that involves adding an include to existing code, adding a base class to and existing class and then linking with a previously compiled library. The main problem for me seems to be how can I add the include? Can I compile the include alone to byte code and pre-pend it? Should I compile the library, which includes the include and parse out the include and

Hi, I''m trying to do a bulk update on an array with the helper text_field. I''m trying to create an inputfield for every object in the array, but I''m not getting it right... example: class ClassA @arrayB[] end HTML (code with error): <% 0.upto(9) do |index| %> <%= text_field ''ClassA'', ''arrayB[index]'' %> non

Dear List, I'm struggling with the signature writing cbind/rbind functions for a S4 class. First of all, I'm very happy that it is now possible to dispatch on ... I follow the example for "paste" in ?dotMethods, which works as far as this: ### start example setClass ("cbtest", representation = representation (data = "data.frame"),

Hi all, this question has already been posted on stackoverflow, however without success, see also http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27886535/proper-way-to-use-cbind-rbind-with-s4-classes-in-package. I have written a package using S4 classes and would like to use the functions rbind, cbind with these defined classes. Since it does not seem to be possible to define rbind and cbind directly as S4

Hi Gyounghwa Kim, > First of all, thank you very much for your answer. > I tried your sugestion and found out that it is not what I wanted. > What I have to do is call a native C function from inside this > generated function. > Is there any way that we can find and call native C functions not > created by LLVM IR? You can insert a declaration of the function into the IR, then

Where should the setClass() ('methods' package) calls be placed in a package? I try to follow a one-class-one-file principe, but since setClass("ClassA", "ClassB") has to come a after setClass("ClassB", [snip]) it is not possible to fully follow this rule. So the best I can do now is to put all setClass() calls in a file named "000.R" (I know this

Dear list, It seems that a package (pkgB) using another package (pkgA) with S4 generics formed by taking existing functions (for example 'plot') must not import the existing functions ('plot') in its namespace to avoid the warning "replacing previous import: plot". Suppose we use the simple 'import' directive in the name space of pkgB. pkgA and pkgB files would

Dear all, I am currently learning how to create R packages using C++ classes. For this purpose I have written a small package MyClass (which I try to attach since I do not have access to a website). MyClass has methods WriteFileC() and WriteFileCpp() which implement C-style and C++-style writing of a table to a file using FILE or ofstream respectively, and the corresponding R-functions

>>>>> Michael Lawrence <lawrence.michael at gene.com> >>>>> on Sat, 24 Jan 2015 06:39:37 -0800 writes: > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Mario Annau > <mario.annau at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi all, this question has already been posted on >> stackoverflow, however without success, see also >>

Hi, I''m running Puppet 0.23.0 on my servers, and i got something like this: In a classa.pp file (included in site.pp): class A { file { "test1": ... } } In a classb.pp file (included in site.pp): class B { file { "test2": ... } if defined(File["test1"]) { ... do things ... } if

Hi, have got anybody experience or a starting point for me, how i can program a function which calculate me a probability transition matrix with a data.frame and two states. I have some independend variable and a class variable for two states - in example one from Jan2003 and the same variables from June2003. Now i would like to calculate the probability that PERSON X change from classA to