similar to: compare proportions

> Dear R-users! > > I am using R 1.0.0 and Windows NT 4.0. > Suppose I have a population of N=100 subjects, a binomial variable and a random sample of n=20 subjects from my population, giving 15 "successes". I am interested in obtaining a confidence interval for the proportion of "successes" in my population. In R, I can use > library(ctest) >

Hi, I am wondering if anyone can suggest how to test the equality of 2 proportions. The caveat here is that the 2 proportions were calculated from the same number of samples using 2 different tests. So essentially we are comparing 2 accuracy rates from same, say 100, samples. I think this is like a paired test, but don't know if really we need to consider the "paired" nature of the

I'm testing to a seamless upgrade from 4.3.11 to 4.8.3 on my test setup. Database migrating from 4.3.11 was successful. After "samba-tool dbdcheck --cross-ncs --fix --yes", 4.8.3 was launching ok except replication (4.3.11 to 4.8.3 : WERR_BADFILE). After demoting older ones and seize (transfer doesn't work) all roles to 4.8.3, dns (bind_dlz) service won't start anymore

Dear R users this may be a simple question - but i would appreciate any thoughts does anyone know how you would get one lower and one upper confidence interval for a set of data that consists of proportions. i.e. taking a usual confidence interval for normal data would result in the lower confidence interval being negative - which is not possible given the data (which is constrained between

Hi How to solve this ? So many similar segfaults Thank you On 2018-11-30 06:11, Joan Moreau wrote: > ANother (very very long) example : > > # gdb /usr/libexec/dovecot/indexer-worker core.indexer-worker.0.3a33f56105e043de802a7dfcee265a07.21017.1543533424000000 > GNU gdb (GDB) 8.2 > Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or

> On December 4, 2018 at 8:18 AM Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > > We don't consider it as "very early beta". We consider it production ready. It is bit more work to set up though. FWIW, Squat has been deprecated since 2.0, so none of this should come as a surprise. https://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS > Aki > > > On 04 December

Thanks for mySql For Squat vs Solr, Solr does not reach Squat by very far in terms of results : If I setup Solr, and search (via the search in Roundbube or Evolution) for a keyword or part of the keyword, the results are complete non sense. The diference between "search in full body" and "search in fields" does not even work. Solr with Dovecot seems very early beta

Hi Manuel, 2017-06-14 15:16 GMT+02:00 Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro>: > Hello > > > > On 06/14/2017 03:32 PM, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > > > On Jun 7, 2017, at 5:47 AM, Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> > wrote: > >> > >>> > If that matters, the OS is a fully updated CentOS 6.9 and this >>>

Hi, I'm having problems with windows which open off-screen and are thus inaccessible. Until recently, I ran my laptop with an external monitor in a dual-screen configuration. Now, I'm back to a single screen, but some wine apps appear to be trying to start up elsewhere. So, I can verify that the program is running using ps and xwininfo: wtipton 6652 26.5 2.3 2662984 36500 ?

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1526 Summary: SSH key prompt if public key missing and pubkey auth fails Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.1p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P4 Component: ssh-agent AssignedTo:

On Jun 16, 2017, at 6:12 AM, Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> wrote: > > running autogen.sh was triggered automatically. but even if I do it explicitly, I still get: > + autoreconf -i > configure.ac:887: warning: AC_LANG_CONFTEST: no AC_LANG_SOURCE call detected in body

Hi, On Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise Profiles path: \\fs\profiles\rprofile On Centos Version 7 Samba Version 4.7.1 ROLE_DOMAIN_MEMBER [profiles] comment = Users profiles path = /profiles browseable = No read only = No force create mode = 0600 force directory mode = 0700 csc policy = disable store dos attributes = yes

Hi, ALL, Is there any function in R that does the exact test for the matched pair proportions (one sided), which I assume is binomial(b+c, .5). Thanks, Annie [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi all, I am wondering whether there is a small bug in the binom.test function of the ctest library (I'm using R 1.6.0 on windows 2000, but Splus 2000 seems to have the same behaviour). Or perhaps I've misunderstood something. the command binom.test(11,100,p=0.1) and binom.test(9,100,p=0.1) give different p-values (see below). As 9 and 11 are equidistant from 10, the mean of the

Full_Name: Petr Savicky Version: 2.4.0 OS: Fedora Core release 2 Submission from: (NULL) (62.24.91.47) the error is > binom.test(0.56*10000,10000) Error in binom.test(0.56 * 10000, 10000) : 'x' must be nonnegative and integer while > binom.test(5600,10000) yields correct result. The same error occurrs for > binom.test(0.57*10000,10000)

On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 09:17:41 +0300 Taner Tas via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I'm testing to a seamless upgrade from 4.3.11 to 4.8.3 on my test > setup. Database migrating from 4.3.11 was successful. After > "samba-tool dbdcheck --cross-ncs --fix --yes", 4.8.3 was launching ok > except replication (4.3.11 to 4.8.3 : WERR_BADFILE). After demoting >

Hi all, I have 4 glusterd servers running a single glusterfs volume. The volume was created using the gluster command line, with no changes from default. The same machines all mount the volume using the native glusterfs client: [root at localhost ~]# gluster volume create datastore replica 2 transport tcp 192.168.253.1:/glusterfs/primary 192.168.253.3:/glusterfs/secondary

Hello all, I am trying to understand the different results I am getting from the following 3 commands: chisq.test(c(62,50), p = c(0.512,1-0.512), correct = F) # p-value = 0.3788 binom.test(x=62,n=112, p= 0.512) # p-value = 0.3961 2*(1-pbinom(62,112, .512)) # p-value = 0.329 Well, the binom.test was supposed to be "exact" and give the same results as the pbinom, while the chisq.test

Hello everybody. Does anyone else find the last test in the following sequence odd? Can anyone else reproduce it or is it just me? > binom.test(100,200,0.13)$p.value [1] 2.357325e-36 > binom.test(100,200,0.013)$p.value [1] 6.146546e-131 > binom.test(100,200,0.0013)$p.value [1] 1.973702e-230 > binom.test(100,200,0.00013)$p.value [1] 0.9743334 (R 1.5.1, Linux RedHat 7.1) --

R. 1.1.0 The example below is self explanatory. ## 1 ## # works fine > binom.test((50*.64),50,.5,alt='g') ... Exact binomial test ... ## 2 ## # WHAT ! ? > binom.test((50*.65),50,.5,alt='g') Error in binom.test((50 * 0.65), 50, 0.5, alt = "g") : x must be an