similar to: wgrib2 for windows 7

Looks like this is indeed related to r360841. In C, there are distinctions between declarations, definitions and tentative definitions. Global variables declared with "extern" are declarations. Global variables that don't have "extern" and have initializers are definitions. If global variables have neither "extern" nor initializers, they are called tentative

Hi , I have an issue during LTO phase of llvm compiler which is as follows, File t3.c --------- #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> // A linked list node struct Node { int data; struct Node* next; struct Node* prev; }; struct Node* head; /* Given a reference (pointer to pointer) to the head of a list and an int, inserts a new node on the front of the list. */

Hi Teresa, Can you please let me know if there is any update on this issue. Thanks M Suresh From: Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 7:23 PM To: Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> Cc: Mani, Suresh <Suresh.Mani at amd.com>; llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Expected behavior of lld during LTO for global symbols

Hi, I got lots of "undefined reference" when building vmkit. Anyone can help to give a solution? I download vmkit with "svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/vmkit/trunk/", followed the instructions of "http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/vmkit/trunk/README.TXT", and built vmkit on ubuntu 13.10 x64 with sunjava 1.6.0_45 + llvm 3.3 + classpath 0.99 + gcc 4.8.1.

Thanks for the info Teresa, Regards M Suresh From: Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2019 7:15 PM To: Mani, Suresh <Suresh.Mani at amd.com> Cc: Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com>; llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Expected behavior of lld during LTO for global symbols (Attr Internal/Common) [CAUTION: External

Hello, My partner and I am making a small app needs to access a C++ library from the LLVM 2.5 JIT. We've made sure that there are no classes and have put 'extern "c"' in front of the functions we need to access. In order to make this work, we seem to need to have a bitcode version of libstdc++ so we can avoid writing our own implementations of std::string and std::vector.

Hi, I''ve just updated my app to the final 3.1 release and deployed it to the staging server after running tests but there is a problem with the precompiled assets. The precompiled assets are all in the public directory, like they were before, Capistrano doesn''t throw any error and running `rake assets:precompile` in the current directory work as expected. But the asset

I'll test on Darwin/PPC, precompiled llvmgcc, objdir == srcdir. Rob On Apr 16, 2006, at 1:42 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Tanya Lattner wrote: >> For testing, we would like a mix of people to do x86 and ppc. >> Please send email to the list if you plan to test, what >> architecture, and if you will use the llvm-gcc binary or compile >> it

Chris Lattner wrote: > As others have mentioned, hacking the front-end isn't that hard. In > any case though, please be aware that a precompiled binary for a non- > MIPS target won't produce correct code if you are (for example) using > an x86 front-end and forcing llc to generate mips code with llc - > march=mips. The front-end does type layout and knows very ABI

hi all, i surely overlooked something. but i am currently trying to do some benchmarking stuff with llvm. in my thesis i was using llvm-1.5 (i did some extension work, which i would have to frontport now). But unfortunately 1.5 is for some benchmarks unstable (at least on my box) such that llc sigsegvs sometimes, etc. So I wanted to give 1.9 a go and build that on the my intel mac book. I did

Hello, I do not know whether this idea would be considered useful or not. Or easy to implement. But it is the case that on certain Linux distributions there are OS packages with precompiled R packages. However, install.packages (and related functions) download the source ones. Would it be possible to add an extra "repository" (or option) on install.packages that would direct R to

I tried to use lsode with precompiled C code instead of an R function defining the derivatives. No problem so far. However, now I need to implement an ODE that contains spline functions, i.e. the derivatives at given time points depend on the value of a spline function at this time point. What is an efficient way to implement this in precompiled C code? -- Daniel Kaschek <daniel.kaschek at

On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 02:09:19PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > On 03/04/2014 05:12 AM, Asadullah Hussain wrote: > > Hello I have manually compiled a customized qemu (1.4.0) which runs fine on > > its own (create VM etc) but I want to access this qemu through libvirt > > (virt-manager, virsh etc). > > > > But the libvirt driver only looks into "/usr/bin"

I haven't seen anyone claim x86 linux objdir == srcdir, so I'll test it out. Missed the 18th,but I'll try to have it done asap. On Apr 18, 2006, at 2:51 PM, Robert L. Bocchino Jr. wrote: > I'll test on Darwin/PPC, precompiled llvmgcc, objdir == srcdir. > > Rob > > On Apr 16, 2006, at 1:42 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Tanya Lattner

Hi Johannes, Thank you for your quick feddback. As I am using linux os build with buildroot on my raspberry pi I can't use package manager such as apt-get to install R. What I need to do is to get the precompiled R for arm arch and then when I build my linux image using buildroot I include the R precompiled package to my rootfs. Could you please send me a link where I can download

I'm having a problem with MCJIT (in LLVM 3.3 and 3.4), in which it's not resolving symbol mangling in a precompiled bitcode in the same way as old JIT. It's possible that it's just my misunderstanding. Maybe somebody can spot my problem, or identify it as an MCJIT bug. Here's my situation, in a nutshell: * I am assembling IR and JITing in my app. The IR may potentially make

No, it's not his version of autoconf or automake. I had the same errors even with the latest versions available for my debian distribution. I only could help myself by using one of my precompiled binaries from a previous cvs snapshot. I haven't tried it with the current snapshot but I also don't know if there had been any update lately. Michael Smith wrote: >>all ok until

Using GCC 4.9.2, decoding the opus test vector set 10 times. All tests pass. I will do longer tests later with a larger test set, but it looks good so far. I am having a lot of trouble with the Ne10 detection. Using the precompiled Ne10 binaries at http://people.linaro.org/~viswanath.puttagunta/opus/NE10_root/ Both NE10 and Ne10 capitalizations seem to be in use. Also, where should the NE10

On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Samuel Crow<samuraileumas at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hello, > > My partner and I am making a small app needs to access a C++ library from the LLVM 2.5 JIT.  We've made sure that there are no classes and have put 'extern "c"' in front of the functions we need to access.  In order to make this work, we seem to need to have a bitcode

The direct cause of this issue is that, previously lld converted common symbols to defined symbols before passing input files to LTO, and after r360841 they are passed as common symbols to LTO. Making lld to work as before is easy, as we can convert common symbols to defined symbols as before. Here is a patch to do that, and I confirmed that that restores the original behavior for the reported