similar to: fuse mount disconnecting...

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "fuse mount disconnecting..."

2013 Mar 21
1
sshfs -o rellinks (module option) rejected by fuse
New to sshfs and new to this mailing list so please guide me if required. Is this a bug? When sshfs is given option -o rellinks, it responds with fuse: unknown option `rellinks' According to my understanding of the sshfs man page and --help output this option a) is valid and b) should be passed to the module, not to fuse. Versions: SSHFS version 2.4 FUSE library version: 2.8.5
2023 Jul 05
1
remove_me files building up
Hi Strahil, This is the output from the commands: root at uk3-prod-gfs-arb-01:~# du -h -x -d 1 /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick 2.2G /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick/.glusterfs 24M /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick/scalelite-recordings 16K /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick/mytute 18M /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick/.shard 0
2023 Jun 30
1
remove_me files building up
Hi, We're running a cluster with two data nodes and one arbiter, and have sharding enabled. We had an issue a while back where one of the server's crashed, we got the server back up and running and ensured that all healing entries cleared, and also increased the server spec (CPU/Mem) as this seemed to be the potential cause. Since then however, we've seen some strange behaviour,
2023 Jul 04
1
remove_me files building up
Thanks for the clarification. That behaviour is quite weird as arbiter bricks should hold?only metadata. What does the following show on host?uk3-prod-gfs-arb-01: du -h -x -d 1?/data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brickdu -h -x -d 1?/data/glusterfs/gv1/brick3/brickdu -h -x -d 1 /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick2/brick If indeed the shards are taking space -?that is a really strange situation.From which version
2023 Jul 04
1
remove_me files building up
Hi, Thanks for your response, please find the xfs_info for each brick on the arbiter below: root at uk3-prod-gfs-arb-01:~# xfs_info /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1 meta-data=/dev/sdc1 isize=512 agcount=31, agsize=131007 blks = sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=1 = crc=1 finobt=1, sparse=1, rmapbt=0 =
2023 Jul 04
1
remove_me files building up
Hi Strahil, We're using gluster to act as a share for an application to temporarily process and store files, before they're then archived off over night. The issue we're seeing isn't with the inodes running out of space, but the actual disk space on the arb server running low. This is the df -h? output for the bricks on the arb server: /dev/sdd1 15G 12G 3.3G 79%
2023 Jul 03
1
remove_me files building up
Hi, you mentioned that the arbiter bricks run out of inodes.Are you using XFS ?Can you provide the xfs_info of each brick ? Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov? On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 19:41, Liam Smith<liam.smith at ek.co> wrote: Hi, We're running a cluster with two data nodes and one arbiter, and have sharding enabled. We had an issue a while back where one of the server's
2023 Jul 04
1
remove_me files building up
Hi Liam, I saw that your XFS uses ?imaxpct=25? which for an arbiter brick is a little bit low. If you have free space on the bricks, increase the maxpct to a bigger value, like:xfs_growfs -m 80 /path/to/brickThat will set 80% of the Filesystem for inodes, which you can verify with df -i /brick/path (compare before and after).?This way?you won?t run out of inodes in the future. Of course, always
2017 Jan 04
0
shadow_copy and glusterfs not working
On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 15:16 +0100, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > Hello, > > we are trying to configure a CTDB-Cluster with Glusterfs. We are using > Samba 4.5 together with gluster 3.9. We set up a lvm2 thin-provisioned > volume to use gluster-snapshots. > Then we configured the first share without using shadow_copy2 and > everything was working fine. > > Then we
2017 Jan 03
2
shadow_copy and glusterfs not working
Hello, we are trying to configure a CTDB-Cluster with Glusterfs. We are using Samba 4.5 together with gluster 3.9. We set up a lvm2 thin-provisioned volume to use gluster-snapshots. Then we configured the first share without using shadow_copy2 and everything was working fine. Then we added the shadow_copy2 parameters, when we did a "smbclient" we got the following message: root at
2018 Feb 07
0
Fwd: Troubleshooting glusterfs
Hello Nithya! Thank you for your help on figuring this out! We changed our configuration and after having a successful test yesterday we have run into new issue today. The test including moderate read/write (~20-30 Mb/s) and scaling the storage was running about 3 hours and at some moment system got stuck: On the user level there are such errors when trying to work with filesystem: OSError:
2013 Apr 30
0
Libvirt and Glusterfs
Hi, On a Fedora 18, I try to launch a VM with QEMU-GlusterFS native integration. I have enable fedora-virt-preview repo, and gluster-alpha3 repo. Below the list of installed package : glusterfs-3.4.0-0.3.alpha3.fc18.x86_64 glusterfs-devel-3.4.0-0.3.alpha3.fc18.x86_64 glusterfs-fuse-3.4.0-0.3.alpha3.fc18.x86_64 glusterfs-server-3.4.0-0.3.alpha3.fc18.x86_64
2018 Feb 09
0
self-heal trouble after changing arbiter brick
Hey, Did the heal completed and you still have some entries pending heal? If yes then can you provide the following informations to debug the issue. 1. Which version of gluster you are running 2. gluster volume heal <volname> info summary or gluster volume heal <volname> info 3. getfattr -d -e hex -m . <filepath-on-brick> output of any one of the which is pending heal from all
2018 Feb 09
1
self-heal trouble after changing arbiter brick
Hi Karthik, Thank you very much, you made me much more relaxed. Below is getfattr output for a file from all the bricks: root at gv2 ~ # getfattr -d -e hex -m . /data/glusterfs/testset/306/30677af808ad578916f54783904e6342.pack getfattr: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: data/glusterfs/testset/306/30677af808ad578916f54783904e6342.pack
2018 Feb 09
0
self-heal trouble after changing arbiter brick
Hi Karthik, Thank you for your reply. The heal is still undergoing, as the /var/log/glusterfs/glustershd.log keeps growing, and there's a lot of pending entries in the heal info. The gluster version is 3.10.9 and 3.10.10 (the version update in progress). It doesn't have info summary [yet?], and the heal info is way too long to attach here. (It takes more than 20 minutes just to collect
2024 Jan 26
1
Gluster communication via TLS client problem
Hi to all, The system is running Debian 12 with Gluster 10. All systems are using the same versions. I try to encrypt the communication between the peers and the clients via TLS. The encryption between the peers works, but when I try to mount the volume on the client I always get an error. What have I done? 1. all hosts and clients can resolve the name of all systems involved. 2. the
2024 Jan 26
1
Gluster communication via TLS client problem
Hi Stefan, Does the combined?glusterfs.ca includes client nodes pem? Also this file need to be placed in Client node as well. -- Aravinda Kadalu Technologies ---- On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:14:39 +0530 Stefan Kania <stefan at kania-online.de> wrote --- Hi to all, The system is running Debian 12 with Gluster 10. All systems are using the same versions. I try to encrypt the
2009 May 05
2
problem with ggplot2 boxplot, groups and facets
I have a following problem: The call qplot(wg, v.realtime, data=df.best.medians$gv1, colour=sp, geom="boxplot") works nice: for each value of the wg factor I get two box-plots (two levels in the sp factor) in different colours, side-by-side, centered at the wg x-axis. However, I want to separate the data belonging to different levels of the n factor, so I add the facets option:
2018 Feb 08
5
self-heal trouble after changing arbiter brick
Hi folks, I'm troubled moving an arbiter brick to another server because of I/O load issues. My setup is as follows: # gluster volume info Volume Name: myvol Type: Distributed-Replicate Volume ID: 43ba517a-ac09-461e-99da-a197759a7dc8 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 3 x (2 + 1) = 9 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: gv0:/data/glusterfs Brick2: gv1:/data/glusterfs Brick3:
2013 Jul 24
1
Libvirt and Glusterfs pool
Hi, I use the QEMU-GlusterFS native integration (no Fuse mount) with the libvirt. Now I create a volume issuing : # qemu-img create gluster://localhost/gv1/test.img 5G Then using the libvirt I declare the following lines in my domain.xml : <disk type='network' device='disk'> <driver name='qemu' cache='none'/> <source