similar to: Phrase search problem

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "Phrase search problem"

2017 Nov 01
1
Correct subsetting in R
Hi all, I have two data frames that one of them does not have the column ID: > str(data) 'data.frame': 499 obs. of 608 variables: $ ID : int 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... $ alright : int 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 ... $ bad : int 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... $ boy : int 1 2 1 1 0 2 2 4 2 1 ... $ cooki : int 1 2 2 1 0 1 1 4 2 3
2004 Aug 07
11
Traffic shaping?
Ok, shaping on Linux is new to me.. so bear with me if i am just stupid. curtain:/etc/shorewall# grep TC shorewall.conf | grep -v ^# TCP_FLAGS_LOG_LEVEL=info TC_ENABLED=Yes CLEAR_TC=Yes TCP_FLAGS_DISPOSITION=DROP curtain:/etc/shorewall# So it should be enabled, right? ---- tcrules ---- 1 eth0 0.0.0.0/0 all 2 eth1 0.0.0.0/0 all 2 eth2 0.0.0.0/0
2017 Nov 01
1
Correct subsetting in R
It's not what I want, the first data frame has 499 observations and the second data frame is a subset of the first one but with 375 observations. I want something that returns the ID for training data frame On Wednesday, November 1, 2017 10:18 AM, Eric Berger <ericjberger at gmail.com> wrote: matches <- merge(training,data,by=intersect(names(training),names(data))) HTH, Eric
2017 Nov 01
1
Correct subsetting in R
But they row.names() cannot give me the IDs On Wednesday, November 1, 2017 9:45 AM, David Wolfskill <r at catwhisker.org> wrote: On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 04:13:42PM +0000, Elahe chalabi via R-help wrote: > Hi all, > I have two data frames that one of them does not have the column ID: > > > str(data) > 'data.frame': 499 obs. of 608 variables:
2010 Apr 01
2
canary_thread
People, Anybody knows what mean this message in my CLI: [Apr 1 16:58:34] WARNING[3845]: asterisk.c:3050 canary_thread: The canary is no more. He has ceased to be! He's expired and gone to meet his maker! He's a stiff! Bereft of life, he rests in peace. His metabolic processes are now history! He's off the twig! He's kicked the bucket. He's shuffled off his mortal
2012 May 25
1
Bug#674057: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: xen-common | 4.1.2-1 | source xen-utils-common | 4.1.2-1 | all ------------------- Reason ------------------- RoQA; obsoleted by xen ---------------------------------------------- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be
2010 Apr 28
1
Strange Error -- ASterisk 1.6
All, I just noticed this in my logs, and am rather lost as to what module it pertains to. I would assume pseudo-realtime priority for the process, but I am looking for a little confirmation from the group: [Apr 28 12:28:36] WARNING[20773] asterisk.c: The canary is no more. He has ceased to be! He's expired and gone to meet his maker! He's a stiff! Bereft of life, he rests in
2010 Jun 11
2
Need help getting nouveau drivers working on Fedora 13
My desktop computer uses a GeForce FX 5200 card and, when I was using Fedora 11, the kmod-nvidia drivers (a Fedora-specific repackaging of the binary blob) worked Just Fine. Now, even though I've followed all of the instructions for them, they don't. In fact, my system won't even complete booting if they're active. (I'm posting from a laptop, while I'm trying to get
2009 Jun 14
2
Installing and maintaining R on Ubuntu 9.04 -, best practice
I had an exchange of ideas on this with Dirk E. a couple of months ago. He can correct this if I state it wrongly, but 1) we agreed that using apt/Synaptic structure was best, but sometimes the packages are not available 2) also that using install.packages when there is a .deb can lead to some "confusion" (the package database on the local system does not know about an R package
2015 Jan 17
3
DMARC test (request)
> On Saturday, January 17, 2015 1:48 AM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 07:37:44PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: >?????????? <snip/> > > > As far as I can tell, GMail does process the SPF/DKIM/DMARC properties > > > but ignores
2015 Jan 23
0
DMARC test (request)
> > > > > > Let's see what happens. > > > > > > > Perhaps this time? > > I did miss the reason why a new test would be usefull. > Perhaps are people behind the curtains too shy :-) > > The test did NOT show any improvement. > > > In the webinterface of mailman, that is where I access privileges, > is now
2015 Jan 22
0
DMARC test (request)
> On Saturday, January 17, 2015 9:34 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at yahoo.com> wrote: > > On Saturday, January 17, 2015 1:48 AM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 07:37:44PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: > > <snip/>
2010 Jul 07
0
Bug#588321: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: xen-3 | 3.4.3-1 | source xen-docs-3.4 | 3.4.3-1 | all xen-hypervisor-3.4-amd64 | 3.4.3-1 | amd64, i386 xen-hypervisor-3.4-i386 | 3.4.3-1 | i386 xen-utils-3.4 | 3.4.3-1 | amd64, i386 ------------------- Reason ------------------- ROM; Superseeded by xen
2018 Jan 04
0
Random Forest tree labels
Hi all, I have built a Random Forest using Caret package, however, I don't understand how the splits are labeled in trees. My dataset contains the frequency of the words in the speeches of the people: 'data.frame': 499 obs. of 608 variables: $ alright : num 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 ... $ bad : num 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... $ boy : num 1 2 1 1 0 2 2 4 2 1 ... $ cooki : num 1 2 2 1 0 1 1 4
2014 Mar 02
0
Bug#738322: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: guest-templates | 0.1-4 | source xcp-guest-templates | 0.1-4 | amd64, i386 ------------------- Reason ------------------- ROM; non maintained upstream ---------------------------------------------- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may
2014 Mar 02
0
Bug#738322: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 0.1-4+rm Dear submitter, as the package guest-templates has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/738322 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using
2014 Mar 02
0
Bug#740517: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libxenapi-ocaml-dev | 1.3.2-15 | amd64, i386 python-xenapi | 1.3.2-15 | all xcp-networkd | 1.3.2-15 | amd64, i386 xcp-squeezed | 1.3.2-15 | amd64, i386 xcp-v6d | 1.3.2-15 | amd64, i386 xcp-xapi | 1.3.2-15 | amd64, i386 xcp-xapi-debug | 1.3.2-15 | amd64, i386 xcp-xe |
2014 Mar 02
0
Bug#740517: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 1.3.2-15+rm Dear submitter, as the package xen-api has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/740517 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using
2014 Mar 02
0
Bug#740518: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libxcp-ocaml | 0.5.2-3.1 | amd64, i386 libxcp-ocaml-dev | 0.5.2-3.1 | amd64, i386 xcp-fe | 0.5.2-3.1 | amd64, i386 xen-api-libs | 0.5.2-3.1 | source ------------------- Reason ------------------- ROM; non maintained upstream ---------------------------------------------- Note
2014 Mar 02
0
Bug#740518: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 0.5.2-3.1+rm Dear submitter, as the package xen-api-libs has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/740518 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using