similar to: OSDC 2010

Hello all - Second-to-last notice to collect RSVP's for interested parties for the Asterisk Birds of a Feather dinner/beer meeting. There are five people signed up for this at the moment. Looks like it's going to be the 23rd of September, since that fits well with the VON conference schedule. Please email me directly for details. JT >Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 01:52:52 -0700

Olly, Thanks a lot! I installed Xapian 1.2.25 on Ubuntu 14.04. How to set environment variable XAPIAN_CJK_NGRAM? I'm a newbie to Xapian. Best wishes, Peter At 2018-02-12 20:00:02, xapian-discuss-request at lists.xapian.org wrote: >Send Xapian-discuss mailing list submissions to > xapian-discuss at lists.xapian.org > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,

Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 05:21:43PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > > Hello, is there a way to optimize sorting by certain values > > for queries which return a huge amount of results? > [...] > > $enquire->set_sort_by_value_then_relevance(0, 1); > > If you're just wanting the 200 newest, it'll be faster not to

There was some talk on the IRC channel about getting a convention/conference together for Asterisk users. While I do not have the authority (or time) to make such a proposition, I'd like to see if I can gather some support for a BOF (Birds Of a Feather) meeting on a somewhat smaller scale and in a shorter timeframe. The VON (Voice On the Net - http://www.pulver.com/von/) show is in

On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 05:13:09PM +0000, James Aylett wrote: > On 3 Mar 2019, at 17:01, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > > > I suspect what's going on here is that bootstrap will by default > > download, build and install (into a subdirectory of the build tree) any > > of the autotools for which suitable versions aren't already installed. > >

On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 02:24:51 +0000, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 04:30:55PM +0100, Eric J wrote: >> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 03:17:35 +0000, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: >>>On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:26:27PM +0100, Eric wrote: >>>> % package require xapian 1.0.0 >>>> 1.2.18 >>> >>>

Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> writes: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 08:43:13AM -0400, David Bremner wrote: >> Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> writes: >> >> > To achieve this with synonyms in a configurable way you'd need to >> > rewrite the synonyms in the database to match the current configuration, >> > so it's not as dynamic as the

> > Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > > > > > > The reverse order (ENQ_ASCENDING) is really fast - about 0.0001 seconds. > > > This is because in that case we can just stop once we've found 200 > > > matches. With a few million documents, that ENQ_ASCENDING sounds promising :) So, it looks like if I had ideal ordering, I could do

Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 06:04:42PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > > Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:33:08PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > > > > Or would I fiddle with wdf_inc for all ->index_text and ->add_term > > > > calls on a per-DB basis? > > > >

Dear Michael & Hal, We had a submission to SC13 on beating OpenACC compilers with LLVM+Polly+NVPTX [1]. Unfortunately, reviewers somehow expected we want to go into polyhedral tools intercomparison, which was absolutely not our goal. The goal was exactly to bring a competitive HPC/GPU toolchain for end users. Only NV works for now, MIC is in progress. If you think this contribution is worth a

Folks, Please note that the survey is still open! But it's almost time for the US LLVM meeting and I'd like to give everybody the ability to inspect the results before entering the BoF session tomorrow. Here is a zip file with the raw results (minus emails) of the data up until this morning, and a short presentation with a summary and my personal pick of the comments.

As Olly has already pointed out the 2012 branch is not merged. I think there are some compilation errors in the branch. The code in branch is better refactored. The Ranker and FeatureManager classes are well defined and implemented. Parth. On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 08:34:10PM +0800, jiangwen jiang wrote: >

Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:33:08PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > > Hey all, I've been using ->add_database for a few years > > to tie sharded DBs together and it works great. > > > > Now, I want to be able to search across several DBs > > which aren't sharded, say: linux-DB, glibc-DB, freebsd-DB. > >

John Hodrien wrote: > On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> >> Fully updated 7.2 system. I installed the correct proprietary NVidia >> driver (the user's expensive proprietary visualization software won't >> run with nouveau), I've put nouveau.modeset=0 >> rd.driver.blacklist=nouveau on the kernel line for grub2, and even yum >>

All, I have arranged for an LLVM BoF at SC13 in Denver: http://sc13.supercomputing.org/schedule/event_detail.php?evid=bof143 If you will be at SC13, have an interesting project based on or within LLVM, and would be willing to come to the BoF and spend 10 minutes or so giving an overview of it, please email me. I am trying to get a collection of people together to talk about vectorization and

Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 10:41:52AM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > > Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > > > While the match is running, get_mset(2000, 1000) needs to track > > > 3000 entries so this won't reduce your heap usage (at least not > > > peak usage). > > > > > > Is the heap

ugh, some new evil spamming technique? send a group invite to mailing lists, hoping one of the members will join? Josh --- b3ta Moderator <b3ta-owner@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > > Welcome to B3ta > > It's a free weekly newsletter reporting on the coolest stuff on the > net. > > We work very hard to make best thing in your inbox this week. > > We also use

Olly, the process size does stay constant with the results from one query set, but running other queries will cause it to grow (once). Is it possible that this is a bug with the SWIG python bindings? On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 03:59:21PM -0400, Jeff Rand wrote: > > Run the following code and monitor the

On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 03:17:35 +0000, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: >On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:26:27PM +0100, Eric wrote: >> On Sun, 21 Feb 2016 22:33:22 +0000, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 02:15:25PM +0100, Eric J wrote: >>>> I discovered, while trying to set up Tcl bindings for Notmuch >>>>

Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> writes: > A better option for this is probably a FieldProcessor - you set one for > a prefix and the it gets passed the value and returns a Query object > for it. E.g. in lua (where you can just pass an anon function for the > FieldProcessor - we ought to support C++11 lambdas for such things): [snip] > To achieve this with synonyms in a