similar to: Systemtap

I want to use systemtap on a 5.3 system but cannot find supporting kernel-PAE-debuginfo or kernel-debuginfo-common packages. Am I being a noob, or do these not exist for the PAE kernel? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20101202/82cc98b8/attachment-0002.html>

For those who don't know yet here is the redhat bugzilla on this exploit. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962792 Does anyone know if CentOS 6 have the debug packages available to apply the temp patch for this listed in the bugzilla link? David.

This ntp.conf file works fine under RedHat 9: authenticate no #enable auth driftfile /etc/ntp/drift keys /etc/ntp/ntp.keys server 127.127.1.0 fudge 127.127.1.0 stratum 10 trustedkey 1 enable bclient broadcastclient However, it doesn't work on CentOS 4.1. ntpd complains with this error message: Unable to listen for broadcasts, no

I noticed that the changelog for the new kernel 2.6.9-34 on the redhat enterprise watchlist states on of the fixes as; 145061 - SMART support in SATA driver (P1) Does this mean that with that kernel we should be able to interrogate SATA drives now ? Cheers, Bards.

Hi folks In linux kernel development, there is a debug tool called dprobe ,which can be used to dynamic insert the probes into the function of kernel source code and find what''s goning on.There is also a tool called systemtap which is based on dprobe and kernel debug info. Using the kprobes infrastructure, SystemTap is being developed to dynamically instrument the kernel and user

I downloaded the iso's for x86_64 (twice, from 2 different mirrors) and none of them check sum. Anyone else having this issue? Tim

Hi all, I have few sites which interconnected using a dedicated link. During these few weeks I've found that there are some mysterious traffic pass over my router with constant amount of bandwidth all over the time. I can know this because after working hours, only few applications are running and it did not generate this kind of traffic. Anyone can advice how to detect what kind of

Not sure if this document will be shown to any dtrace users but here is a link if you want to comment on it http://sources.redhat.com/systemtap/wiki/SystemtapDtraceComparison I have went line by line and commented on its content and in accuracies and posted it both to the systemtap email list and my blog, you can see the blogged version at

On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 2:07 PM Peter Kjellstr?m <cap at nsc.liu.se> wrote: > On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 11:10:23 +0530 > Thomas Stephen Lee <lee.iitb at gmail.com> wrote: > ... > > /usr/bin/sensors > > > > from the lm_sensors package > > > > I had run > > > > sensors-detect --auto > > I had no idea people still used that package.

On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 12:33 PM Peter Kjellstr?m <cap at nsc.liu.se> wrote: > On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 10:01:04 +0530 > Thomas Stephen Lee <lee.iitb at gmail.com> wrote: > ... > > Thanks for the information ?. > > Rented a new EPYC Rome Server from Hetzner, but sensors does not show > > status of all cores in list, which is why I asked. > > Curious what

I installed 4.4 on a machine that's got two RAID volumes, one of which is a bit over 2.1 terabytes. The installer had no problem. However, fsck does. Commenting out the volume in /etc/fstab, the machine will boot. The machine will mount the volume and use it. Everything seems fine except fsck, which seems, well, fscked. When trying to run fsck, it says: # fsck /dev/sdb1 fsck 1.35

I have a CentOS 4 server at home where we store all our data, I wanted to get some idea of the amount of traffic going into and out of the server by protocol so I installed IPtraf.. When I run it from an ssh session it looks fine but when I run it directly on the server console its doesn't look right at all.. It doesn't seem to layout correctly.. Is there something I need to do

How do we probe the Xen hypervisor, while running as the dom0 (which is the GUI frontend for us, and running as guest)? Since the entry to hypervisor is controlled, I supposed it will need a patch before systemtap can be used to probe the Xen hypervisor, right? Or is it not a logical thing to do? My target of interest will be to trace/analyze the behavior of the Xen hypervisor, and the

I was creating some directories (mkdir xxxx) while cd'ed to a mounted LV. The first couple of directories were created but subsequent attempts give the following error: #mkdir: cannot create directory `xxxxx': Input/output error The contents of /var/log/messages shows this: Aug 5 10:48:57 inet05 kernel: hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } Aug 5 10:48:57

hey friends, I want to add repositories like dag,dries,freshrpms,rpmfind etc to yum on Centos4.0 Can somebody tell me the entries for these ? Thanks & Regards Ankush Grover -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060201/ae93743b/attachment-0002.html>

I was doing a YUM update, and it found about 70 packages to download and install. While installing, this message popped up a couple of times: /sbin/ldconfig: File /usr/lib/libk3bdevice.so.2.0.0.#prelink#.X8kEMh is empty, not checked. And then after about three or four times of saying that, the YUM update stopped without finishing. So I started it again, and it picked up where it left off, so

hi guys, after installing centos on my ml350 i found 2 choices on the grub options. CENTOS-4 i386 (2.6.9-22.ELsmp) CENTOS-4 i386-up (2.6.9-22.EL) what choice will i choose ? --------------------------------- Yahoo! Autos. Looking for a sweet ride? Get pricing, reviews, & more on new and used cars. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Anyone have any experience with these products yet? We've got one in for eval, but I thought I'd also ask for experiences here... Thanks in advance. Dave Thompson The University of Wisconsin - Madison Computer Sciences Department

Is the new kernel 2.6.9-34 the one that will come with 4.3 ?

Hi, I have a dell poweredge 850 with centos 4, freshly installed. I'm now trying to add in a fibre -> sata raid enclosure with LSI HBA's in the 850. My problem is the enclosure gets detected first, hijacking sda and sdb from the internal SATA drive and causing kernel panic at boot time. I've tried changing the order in modprobe to the following: alias eth0 tg3 alias eth1