similar to: Setting Abbreviatons In .exrc Problems

Hi All, is there an RPM for 4-1 for postgresql? I did a yum, and the latest is only 7-4 Installing: postgresql-server i386 7.4.8-1.RHEL4.1 base 3.0 M and I need at least 8-* Any ideas where to find an RPM for CentOS4-1? Cheers. Mark Sargent.

I am trying to use "~/.exrc" file to customize vi sessions. The file is properly configured: I can telnet or establish a serial terminal session to the server and I can use my customizations when I invoke vi. Still when I use vi with ssh sessions, the mappings in the .exrc file are not working. What part am I missing here? Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Mesut Pak

Hi All, 2 days ago, I used skype on my laptop, which hadn't seen the net before then. I successfully spoke with my mother, and had no problems. Yesterday, I had what I believe was an unauthorized access to my laptop, so, I changed all passwds on my smoothwall box, and also put the local host onto a new subnet. Today, I experienced some weirdness with skype, where, I could hear/be heard,

?Bump. Can someone from dovecot dev team please respond something to my problem ? I've provided all the possible information, and if not please tell me. Or do you only provide support for your own FTS solution bundled with the paid version of dovecot-pro ? If so, you should clearly state it in the wiki. Thanks Le 19/04/2018 ? 10:30, kadafax at gmail.com a ?crit?: > I think I'm

Le 21/05/2018 ? 11:46, Aki Tuomi a ?crit?: > That message is coming from the temporary raw user, not from the actual > user. > > How did you verify that the FTS indexes are not created or updated > automatically? I send an email containing a specific strings ('thahB8ea' in that case) and search agains it: # doveadm search -u username mailbox INBOX body thahB8ea --> No

can you try turning on pluign { fts_enforced = yes } and repeat your test? Aki On 21.05.2018 13:31, kadafax at gmail.com wrote: > Le 21/05/2018 ? 11:46, Aki Tuomi a ?crit?: >> That message is coming from the temporary raw user, not from the actual >> user. >> >> How did you verify that the FTS indexes are not created or updated >> automatically? > I send an

Hi. I want to play the old '97 game "Claw". It installs and runs, but strangly I can't jump in it! No matter what I use, keyboard or gamepad. Normally, if you tap the spacebar, the character makes a low jump; if you hold the spacebar, he makes a high jump. However, under wine all jumps are low. Other movements work fine though. I even tried to run the game under winxp guest in

I think I'm progressing: if I create a brand new user, send her an email, it will not be indexed right away. I need to doveadm rescan / index the Inbox before. At the end of this email, a dovecot's debug log snipset (grep'ed on this user). In it I can read: "Debug: fts: Indexes disabled for namespace '' Can this be a problem ? Thanks doveconf -n output: # 2.2.34

That message is coming from the temporary raw user, not from the actual user. How did you verify that the FTS indexes are not created or updated automatically? Aki On 04.05.2018 12:47, kadafax at gmail.com wrote: > ?Bump. Can someone from dovecot dev team please respond something to my > problem ? I've provided all the possible information, and if not please > tell me. > Or do

Help! I have been using dovecot for some years with great success. A little while ago, I changed my mail server from Fedora to CentOS linux. I reinstalled dovecot, and *almost* everything seems to be working, but one thing. There's *one* user I can't get it to work on without a workaround. The user is "newuser" and the uid is 1111 (actual name and number changed to protect

Hi All, whilst not being an expert on iptables, the below ouput of iptables -L seems too insecure to me. Does anyone agree.? Perhaps I'm not understanding it as well as I think I am.? Please give your thoughts on this. Cheers. Mark Sargent. [root at localhost racket]# iptables -L Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination RH-Firewall-1-INPUT all

I have two instances of an openldap-2.4.39 server running with syncrepl in a master-master replication setup. These are Centos 7.1 test servers which have been running for over 2 months now with no problems. Partly the good behavior of the LDAP servers is due to very little exercise. Yesterday I decided to try and see exactly how well replication was working. With server-2 up and running I

I am running Samba version 3.0.9-1.3E.2 on a server that is joined to a windows server 2003 domain using ADS security. The samba server hosts a share called 'files'. I am having problems mounting this share using a new account I set up. getent passwd shows the information for the new account as does wbinfo -u. Mounting the share with the new users account using the net use command

After upgrading to 3.4.0, I can no longer add new users. Any users that were added beforehand work fine. Any users that I attempt to create cannot login (error: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE). I was able to get one new user account to work (see below), but I cannot add any new users. The server is Ubuntu 9.10 running Samba 3.4.0. I am using: security = user pam password change = yes Updating

Dear all, on CentOs7 based linux w. different versions of Samba (4.6.x from CentOS repos, but also Sernet-Samba-4.7.4 and also compiled from source), "wbinfo -i user at domain.tld" returns different results before the first successful authentication of the user. Server joined as member to Active Directory, idmapping via tdb2. On first attempt, the result returns

Thank you very much, Rowland! Very helpful. But do you say that the change in the output of „wbinfo -i“ is expected after the user has logged in? Should the use of „domain.realm“ vs „NTDOMAIN“ not be consistent, no matter if the user has logged in or not? Many regards, Heiner Von meinem iPhone gesendet > Am 11.03.2018 um 16:09 schrieb Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Here is a description of what I am trying to do (with Samba 3.0.2a & openldap 2.1.27): I have all my users populated into the LDAP with all the applicable attributes; Users can map drives to a server using LDAP as the authentication backend without issue. Where I am running into problems is bringing up a PDC using Samba w/LDAP. * I added

On 21/10/15 17:37, Ole Traupe wrote: > I think I finally managed to understand the [homes] part of the man > pages, and what my problem is: > https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/manpages/smb.conf.5.html > > The misunderstanding comes from my practice I learned on Windows to > just share the "\\server\home" directory and to create per-user > sub-folders

Well, I do. That is not the problem. The problem was that I wasn't used to have user homes to be shares themselves. And when I share \\server\home and want to have the folder \\server\home\newuser to be auto-created, but I actually connect to the share [home] (\\server\home), this section in the smb.conf is always found and so the special [homes] section is never executed (cloned).

Hello, I have a samba server (old - running FC6, samba 3.0.24-11.fc6) that authenticates against AD. This is all configured and has been working fine until this week. A new user has been added to AD, but cannot access the samba drives. All other users can still access samba as normal. net ads testjoin reports OK. wbinfo -a newuser%pass and wbinfo -K newuser%pass both succeed. wbinfo -r