similar to: Closing a DB

On Wed, Jun 19, 2013, at 03:49 PM, Olly Betts wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 01:29:16PM +1000, Bron Gondwana wrote: > > The advantage of compact - it runs approximately 8 times as fast (we > > are CPU limited in each case - writing to tmpfs first, then rsyncing > > to the destination) and it takes approximately 75% of the space of a > > fresh database with maximum

I think what i did is the same with you except i use make rather than make -sj8, and I did as root. And I do as you wrote again: root at hurricanetong-VirtualBox:/home/hurricanetong/xapian-1.2.17/xapian-core-1.2.17# ./configure [...] root at hurricanetong-VirtualBox:/home/hurricanetong/xapian-1.2.17/xapian-core-1.2.17# make -sj8 Making all in . Making all in docs Making all in tests root at

I'm trying to compact (or at least merge) multiple databases, while stripping search records which are no longer required. Backstory: I've inherited the Cyrus IMAPd xapian-based search code from Greg Banks when he left Opera. One of the unfinished parts was removing expunged emails from the search database. We moved from having a single search database to supporting multiple

I uninstall xapian1.3 and install xapian-1.2.17 but i still failed hurricanetong at hurricanetong-VirtualBox:~/workspace$ g++ `xapian-config --cxxflags --libs` demo2.cc /tmp/cc2wsfDJ.o: In function `main': demo2.cc:(.text+0x4a): undefined reference to `Xapian::WritableDatabase::WritableDatabase(std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >

hi, Why xapian don't support memory index/search ? I know there is a method can create memory datebase, like this: Xapian::WritableDatabase db(Xapian::InMemory::open()); *But, if i use these in multithread program, i need create many datebases!!* Xapian::WritableDatabase db1(Xapian::InMemory::open()); //used in thread1 Xapian::WritableDatabase db2(Xapian::InMemory::open()); //used in

On Sun, 21 Feb 2016 22:33:22 +0000, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 02:15:25PM +0100, Eric J wrote: > > I discovered, while trying to set up Tcl bindings for Notmuch > > (https://notmuchmail.org/), which uses Xapian, that flintlock was not > > being locked (I had lost updates). > > It seems to work for me, testing with this: >

Resurrecting an old thread from 2012! Finally got back to working on this. I have been stuck in JavaScript land for too long. Come to find out, on windows, perl does indeed define open to be win32_open and close to be win32_close. This is done in perl/lib/CORE/win3iop.h. So, to get past this problem, I had to modify Xapian.xs to do an #undef of open and close if WIN32 is defined. Also, I had

Going back to the "prioritizing aggregated DBs" thread from February 2020, I've got 390 Xapian shards for 130 public inboxes I want to search against(*). There's more on the horizon (we're expecting tens of thousands of public inboxes). After bumping RLIMIT_NOFILE and running ->add_database a bunch, the actual queries seem to be taking ~30s (not good :x). Now I'm

Hello, I noticed a problem with DatabaseCorruptError exceptions with public-inbox and I guess it's user error... The problem is public-inbox was calling replace_document to modify the DB while iterating through a PostingIterator. At first I thought it was a glass problem, but I've hit it with chert on my dataset, too. I have a standalone Perl script to reproduce the problem at

On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 03:17:35 +0000, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: >On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:26:27PM +0100, Eric wrote: >> On Sun, 21 Feb 2016 22:33:22 +0000, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 02:15:25PM +0100, Eric J wrote: >>>> I discovered, while trying to set up Tcl bindings for Notmuch >>>>

Hello list, looks like one can open a Xapian database in read-only mode and do the following: $db = Search::Xapian::Database->new("/foo/bar/"); $enq = $db->enquire("XIDblub"); the same doesn't seem to be possible with a database opened in read-write mode: $db = Search::Xapian::WritableDatabase->new("/foo/bar/",

Locking of Quartz databases is currently done with a lockfile. This works well from the actual locking side, but the downside is that the lock isn't released if a process doesn't destroy the Xapian::WritableDatabase object. This is made worse because some of the bindings don't call destructors (or don't do it reliably). The obvious alternative is to use actual locking APIs. On

Hello, I've problem with xapian or sth. Ubuntu 8.04, ruby 1.9.3 with rvm, when Im trying to initialize database, Im getting this error: irb > require 'xapian' ==> true irb > database = Xapian::WritableDatabase.new('/full_path/db/xapian_db/development', Xapian::DB_CREATE_OR_OPEN) ArgumentError: Wrong arguments for overloaded method

Hi, I've compiled xapian 1.0.9 (core and buildings) on Windows Xp, using Lemur's nmake files[1]. I'm trying to use acts_as_xapian [2] on RubyOnRails, but I'm facing a problem with the rebuild index process. in acts_as_xapian, to rebuild the index, a new Xapian::WritableDatabase is created with a different path, then flush() is invoked; lastly, the new path is renamed to the old

Xapian (0.7.5) is spitting out this error on a regular basis: org.xapian.errors.DatabaseError: Error reading block 136618: got end of=20= file =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 at=20 org.xapian.XapianJNI.writabledatabase_repalce_document(Native Method) =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 at=20 org.xapian.WritableDatabase.replaceDocument(WritableDatabase.java:67) I don't have a gdb backtrace, only the Java

Hello I am trying to use the java binding for xapian . I am using ubuntu i have compiled the java binding and i got .so and .jar file in build directory. i tried to compiled the sample program from eclipse i get this exception Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no xapian_jni in java.library.path at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:1681) at

I had to make some changes (sorry no diff available) to "configure" in 0.9.9 of the bindings so that I could compile them for OS X 10.4.8. Essentially I replaced the the paths to jni.h with /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Headers. It compiled without error and created both libxapian_jni.so and xapian_jni.jar in the "built" subdirectory when I ran "make

Hi Guys, Here's a simple test case that causes a segfault with the perl bindings patched to enable spelling correction: use strict; use warnings; use Search::Xapian; my $db = Search::Xapian::WritableDatabase->new("test.db", Search::Xapian::DB_CREATE_OR_OPEN); if (!defined($db)) { die("Failed to open xapian_database: $!"); } my $indexer =

Hi, Trying to learn Search::Xapian and be better at perl at the same time, I'm stuck, at the DB_CREATE_OR_OPEN error. Perl says this: ~/dev/sandbox/Xapian-perl$ ./Index1-Xap.pl 100-objects-v1.csv db "db" is not exported by the Search::Xapian module Can't continue after import errors at ./Index1-Xap.pl line 7. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at ./Index1-Xap.pl line 7. What I

The disclaimer automatically added and is not intended to limit legitimate discourse, and any code I write for this is expected to be licensed under whatever license the original work is using. I haven't tried compiling latest code under visual studio yet (is this possible?). I wonder if there is a way to tell gcc to not mangle the names during cross compile. I was able to successfully