similar to: Omega is fast, but not THAT fast

Hi Xiph.org Team. We are using opusfile library <https://github.com/xiph/opusfile> for streaming *.opus* audio in our projects. But now we have a problem with building opusfile library for android with *ndk-build*. In particular, with arm64-v8a platform: Google removed <sys/timeb.h> from android. And now building opusfile with nkd-build crashes with error "fatal error:

> Is that the complete output? Yes it is the complete output against "./runtest ./apitest --verbose topercent2"( after running make remove-cached-databases). I attached the snapshot of the output of commands but the size of the email got bigger than 40kb so i had to place the output as text. If I do not run "make remove-cached-databases" and run "./runtest ./apitest

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Saad Ahmed <ch.saad.ahmed at gmail.com> Date: 3 February 2015 at 21:10 Subject: Waiting for Reply regarding "TestCases Failure" To: Xapian Development <xapian-devel at lists.xapian.org> I have been waiting for reply regarding any further steps to take. Following are the outputs of commands that you asked me to run. All these

Hi guys, I am new to Asterisk. It looks great, but I have a couple of open questions such as - What softphones are recommended and provide Call Center level functionality? - What hardware (especially E1 (Euro S2M) class) are supported? I would like to search the list archives, but can't find a searchable archive. Can someone please point me into the right direction? Thanks. Regards,

Gonzalo, I have an APA III-4FXO and I tried using your configurations, I received the message below: -- Executing Dial("SIP/2010-edfc", "SIP/2217008@Mediatrix") in new stack Sep 6 16:54:51 WARNING[1192491824]: chan_sip.c:590 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x814bf0c (len 774) to 192.168.199.5 returned -1: Operation not permitted -- Called 2217008@Mediatrix Sep 6 16:54:54

Hello all, I'm creating a site where people can share their benchmarks. If you are interested, the site is at (I just started on it so it has the stock graphics and color scheme still): www.dcsnow.com/mambo I would like some thoughts on what would be a good way to standardize the testing so the results are more comparable. Is Bonnie+ a good program for hard drive speed testing? Is there

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2464 Bug ID: 2464 Summary: Adding timestamp to debug messages (log.c:do_log) Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.1p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous Assignee:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2464 Bug ID: 2464 Summary: Adding timestamp to debug messages (log.c:do_log) Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.1p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous Assignee:

Is there any documentation available about what block size MEMDISK uses to load (big iso/harddisk) image files? Experimenting with cptime.c32 on a Lexar Triton Jumpdrive (64GB, 170MB/s read in Windows, 150MB/s write in Windows) on bootable USB3.0 resulted in the following, depending on specified block size: * 2048 bytes --> 25MB/s * 2MB --> 61MB/s It would be nice to know at which speed

I am trying to get the handytone 286 to make a very simple call to * and having problems. It registers with * just fine, but when I place a call (to echo test, for example), the RTP stream seems to have problems opening. Here is there error I get in *: WARNING[98311]: File chan_sip.c, Line 464 (retrans_pkt): Maximum retries exceeded on call 20d1c411-e210-5f3d-3f88-19035c8fcb26@192.168.2.6 for

Holding the vblk->lock across kick causes poor scalability in SMP guests. If one CPU is doing virtqueue kick and another CPU touches the vblk->lock it will have to spin until virtqueue kick completes. This patch reduces system% CPU utilization in SMP guests that are running multithreaded I/O-bound workloads. The improvements are small but show as iops and SMP are increased. Khoa Huynh

Holding the vblk->lock across kick causes poor scalability in SMP guests. If one CPU is doing virtqueue kick and another CPU touches the vblk->lock it will have to spin until virtqueue kick completes. This patch reduces system% CPU utilization in SMP guests that are running multithreaded I/O-bound workloads. The improvements are small but show as iops and SMP are increased. Khoa Huynh

2017-10-10 8:25 GMT+02:00 Karan Sandha <ksandha at redhat.com>: > Hi Gandalf, > > We have multiple tuning to do for small-files which decrease the time for > negative lookups , meta-data caching, parallel readdir. Bumping the server > and client event threads will help you out in increasing the small file > performance. > > gluster v set <vol-name> group

- Use more friendly output with GiB and MiB/s. - Measure time per operation, providing finer grain stats - Add missing stats for flush I hope that these changes will help to understand and imporve virt-v2v performance. Nir Soffer (3): filters: stats: Show size in GiB, rate in MiB/s filters: stats: Measure time per operation filters: stats: Add flush stats filters/stats/stats.c | 117

I'm doing some performance tests on a samba NAS server and I've found some interesting statistics: I'm doing my performance tests in linux using: # time dd if=somelargefileovershare of=/dev/null bs=1M count=100 Then calculating the bandwidth For windows I'm low-tech: stopwatch plus drag-n-drop of a large file (any recommendations on a 'simple' windows program that will

I noticed that R was burning up 100% of a CPU when a call to Sys.sleep() was made. Upon investigation, I discovered that R_checkActivityEx() in src/unix/sys-std.c was putting the entire timeout (in usec) into the struct timeval tv_usec member, leaving tv_sec set to 0. I don't know about other unix variants, but Solaris requires that the timeout value be normalized (i.e. 0 <= tv_usec

Hi, Jens & Rusty This version is rebased against linux-next which resolves the conflict with Paolo Bonzini's 'virtio-blk: allow toggling host cache between writeback and writethrough' patch. Patch 1/3 and 2/3 applies on linus's master as well. Since Rusty will pick up patch 3/3 so the changes to block core (adding blk_bio_map_sg()) will have a user. Jens, could you please

Hi, Jens & Rusty This version is rebased against linux-next which resolves the conflict with Paolo Bonzini's 'virtio-blk: allow toggling host cache between writeback and writethrough' patch. Patch 1/3 and 2/3 applies on linus's master as well. Since Rusty will pick up patch 3/3 so the changes to block core (adding blk_bio_map_sg()) will have a user. Jens, could you please

Hi all I've very big problem with my nfsd server. I'm running FreeBSD-stable and sometime (one time/week) i've this kind of message on the console : bge0 watchdog timeout problems fxp1 watchdog timeout problems and all my network card is down. Nothing can make the network card work again (only reboot working). There are only one service I need on this server and

I see Intel has released a new tool. Oh, it requires some patches to the kernel to record latency times. Good thing people don''t mind patching their kernels, eh? So who can write the equivalent latencytop.d the fastest? ;-) http://www.latencytop.org/ -- cburgess at qnx.com