similar to: CentOS 4 and multi TB storage solutions

Hello, this is a question for the Asterisk systems-integrators; I am creating a rackmount Asterisk server, and would like to start with a TDM400P card. I believe the TDM400P card would work in this server, with the PCI-X configuration: http://www.aberdeeninc.com/abcatg/MB1130.htm , which is the this: http://supermicro.com/products/system/2U/6024/SYS-6024H-82R.cfm Is this correct? I'm

Hi everyone, I just wanted to introduce myself to the rest of the list. My name is Avtar Gill and I am a Computer Consultant / Systems Administrator based in Toronto, Canada. I've got several years of experience dealing with UNIX-like operating systems under my belt and I'm looking forward to contributing to this project in any way possible. Cheers, Avtar

Hi all, I seem to be having some weird problems while trying to add a workstation to an existing domain. Samba 2.2.8a is running on FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p17 and all the clients have Windows 2000 Professional with SP4 installed. This particular workstaion was part of the domain until its hard drive went under. The drive had to be replaced with a new one, the OS was installed and now when I try to

There was recently a thread on this mailing list regarding SuperMicro hardware and CentOS. Here is one of the posts: http://lists.caosity.org/pipermail/centos/2005-January/001503.html My question is about the P8SCi motherboard, a fairly new SuperMicro model. The vendor's specifications page mentions Linux but I would rather hear from end users and their experiences. Here is a URL:

You could always use 40-gigabit between the two storage systems which would speed things dramatically, or back to back 56-gigabit IB. ---------------------------------------- From: zfs-discuss-request@opensolaris.org Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 11:01 PM To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: zfs-discuss Digest, Vol 89, Issue 12 Send zfs-discuss mailing list submissions to

I've setup the CentOS version of the RH Cluster Service on a pair of centos 4.4 i386 test boxes... wanting to do high availabilty stuff. its working, I've added a virtual IP and a fiberchannel hosted e3fs file system thhat either can mount, if I manually crash or reboot one, this IP and FS mount on the other, awesome. the servers are connected to the storage via a QLogic SANbox

Hi all, Somebody has tested directory server (http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Main_Page) under CentOS 4.1?? Is it ready for production environments?? Somebody has ported to centos?? Thank you very much. __________________________________________________ Correo Yahoo! Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ?gratis! Reg?strate ya - http://correo.espanol.yahoo.com/

Hello, I'm not much of a pro when it comes to managing large filesystems in Linux, and I'm not sure if this is entirely on topic, but I felt that you folks would know best. I have a 3Ware 7810 card with 8 160 GB drives attached to it set up as a large RAID5. I fdisked out one large partition and simply mkfsed the drive with that ext3 filesystem, no other tweaking. I'm accessing

Hi again Timo, As agreed earlier tonight, you'll find as attachments 4 diffs (diff -u) implementing the new workaround "tb-lsub-flags". The 4 impacted files are: ./src/imap/imap-settings.h ./src/imap/imap-settings.c ./src/imap/cmd-list.c ./src/config/all-settings.c Here is the proposed description for the dovecot.conf file: # tb-lsub-flags: # Usually IMAP servers don't

Hi, I notice in the Changelog that the tb-negative-fetch workaround shouldn't be needed any longer. We have a user running Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 that is experiencing the same problem described in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263904 The current command did not succeed. the mail server responded: error in imap command uid: invalid body[..] parameter. Missing '>' in

This would be so it could auto-disable GLODA - its new 'Global Search and Indexing' scheme - for that account - assuming they accept (and implement) my bug request to be able to do that: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=544100

Just a status note - my beta group is upgrading/upgraded to the new Thunderbird 2.0.0 (OS X & Win32 so far, Linux to come) and beating it up against Dovecot 1.0.0 and all is A-OK, nary a problem in sight. Obviously just an initial status report, but good mojo so far for those curious about trying it. -te -- Troy Engel | Systems Engineer Fluid, Inc | http://www.fluid.com

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Jeff Boyce <jboyce at meridianenv.com> wrote: > Sorry for breaking the threading, as I only get the daily digest. My > comments (interspersed) begin with the **. > > <...snipped...> > > > Arch Linux create soft-raid - > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Software_RAID_and_LVM > > ** I had not found this one. My first

Have you tried manually putting the kernel/initrd files where they are missing from? Having said that, relying on this machine as a server seems questionable under the circumstances. :-) Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gilbert Sebenste" <sebenste at weather.admin.niu.edu> > To: centos at

On 01/13/2015 12:47 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> I'm having an issue getting a C6.6 install to work on a 3 TB dual hard >> drive system, raid 0. I'm hoping that someone here can help. > 1: Is this system booting UEFI or BIOS? > 2: Is the disk partitioned with MBR or GPT? > 3: Is /boot on its own partition? > > 3TB drives are larger than MBR and BIOS properly

On 17.12.15 22:19, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Alice Wonder wrote: > <snip> >> Oh and sorry for the top posting, is there a way in Thunderbird for >> CentOS to change that default? > > That's odd, Alice - my t-bird at work, and at home, both set me for bottom > posting. Even in the config editor, I don't seen anything that looks like > that setting to

On 15.02.2019 06:29, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: > Hi, > > Could you recommend affordable and reliable cloud storage for 50 TB of data? whats your budget? and 50 TB = 50 000 GB is a big amount which isn't this cheap ...

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 4:10 PM Walter H. <Walter.H at mathemainzel.info> wrote: > > On 15.02.2019 06:29, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Could you recommend affordable and reliable cloud storage for 50 TB of data? > whats your budget? > > and 50 TB = 50 000 GB is a big amount which isn't this cheap ... >> Hi Walter H,

>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 4:10 PM Walter H. <Walter.H at mathemainzel.info> wrote: >> > >> > On 15.02.2019 06:29, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > Could you recommend affordable and reliable cloud storage for 50 TB of data? >> > whats your budget? >> > >> > and 50 TB = 50

https://gsuite.google.com/pricing.html G Suite Business tier. Buy five users and you get unlimited Google Drive storage. That's $50/month. On Thu, Feb 14, 2019, 9:29 PM Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming < tdteoenming at gmail.com wrote: > Hi, > > Could you recommend affordable and reliable cloud storage for 50 TB of > data? > > Here are some important factors to consider: