similar to: Extract fixed effects SE from lmer

For a Monte Carlo study I need to extract from an lme model the estimated standard deviation of a random effect and store it in a vector. If I do a print() or summary() on the model, the number I need is displayed in the Console [it's the 0.1590195 in the output below] >print(fit) >Linear mixed-effects model fit by maximum likelihood > Data: datag2 > Log-likelihood:

The print method for lme *prints out* the fitted correlation matrix for the random effects. Is there any way to get these values as an object in R? I have examined the components of the lme object (called "junk" in the example below) and the components of summary(junk) without finding these numbers. (How I did this: I dumped the entire lme object to a text file and then used egrep to

Dear All,   wondering if someine can access the link to the randsamp code referenced in the R-help archive here: http://www.mail-archive.com/r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch/msg75645.html ? I have tried but for whatever reason I can not get trough. My problem seems to be similar to what the author originally described there, so having access to it would be great. Else, if you have any thougths on sampling

Hi, lme() users, Can some one tell me how to do this. I model Orthodont with the same G for random variables, but different R{i}'s for boys and girls, so that I can get sigma1_square_hat for boys and sigma2_square_hat for girls. The model is Y{i}=X{i}beta + Z{i}b + e{i} b ~ iid N(0,G) and e{i} ~ iid N(0,R{i}) i=1,2 orth.lme <- lme(distance ~ Sex * age, data=Orthodont, random=~age|Subject,

I'm getting an error from nlme that has me stymied. I have a data set ,'mydata', with variables: AChE, Dose, sex, set, and mrid; 'set' and 'mrid' indicate two levels of nesting, with 'set' nested within 'mrid'. I want to fit the model: mod <- nlme(AChE ~ Cexp(Dose, A, B, m), data=mydata, fixed = A+B+M~sex, random=A+B+m~sex | mrid/set,

Dear R-Users: I am trying to find the robust (or sandwich) estimates of the standard error of fixed effects parameter estimates using the package "lmer2". In model-1, I used "robust=TRUE" on the other, in model-2, I used "robust=FALSE". Both models giving me the same estimates. So my question is, does the robust option works in lmer2 to get the robust estimates of

Dear R committee: I am Renzhi, Ph.D student in computer science in the University of Missouri. I have one question for you. I try to install R in the linux server, but I don't have the root permission, is there any way to install the R locally? Thank you very much for helping me. Renzhi Cao Graduate Research Assistant Department of Computer Science University of

Hi, I am trying to run a multilevel model with time nested in people and people nested in dyads (3 levels of nesting) by initially running a series of models to test whether the slope/intercept should be fixed or random. The problem that I am experiencing appears to arise between the random intercept, fixed slope equation AND. (syntax: rint<-lme(BDIAFTER~BDI+WEEK+CORUMTO,

Dear Friends, I am writing to seek any help on "lme" error message. I am using lme to do Mixed-model linear regression. I use my simulated data. However, sometimes, I get the following error message, which I do not understand. "Error in solve.default(pdMatrix(a, fact=TRUE)): system is computationally sigular" I would appreciate any help about it. Thanks a lot Jingyuan Fu

Dear All, I was wondering whether any one knows of a matrix bending function in R that can turn non-positive definite matrices into the nearest positive definite matrix. I was hoping there would be something akin to John Henshall's flbend program (http://agbu.une.edu.au/~kmeyer/pdmatrix.html), which allows the standard errors of the estimated matrix elements to be considered in the

When trying to fit a generalized linear mixed model using glmmPQL: > fit0 <- glmmPQL(ifelse(response=="A",1,0)~gender,data=set1, random=~1|subject,family=binomial) iteration 1 Error in solve.default(pdMatrix(a, fact = TRUE)) : Lapack routine dgesv: system is exactly singular Could this be occuring because the paired responses for each subject are always the same? If

Hi, I'm having trouble with glmmPQL from the MASS package. I'm trying to fit a model with a binary response variable, two fixed and two random variables (nested), with a sample of about 200,000 data points. Unfortunately, I'm getting an error message that is difficult to understand without knowing the internals of the glmmPQL function. > model <- glmmPQL(primed ~

Dear listers, First let me appologize if the same mail arrives multiple times. Recently I had some probelms sending my e-mails to the list. I encountered a problem when running glmmPQL procuedure doing multilevel modeling with a dichotomous outcome. Those are the two error messages I usually get: Error in logLik.reStruct(object, conLin) : NA/NaN/Inf in foreign function call (arg 3)

Hello everyone, I hope this is a fair enough question, but I don’t have access to a copy of Bates and Pinheiro. It is probably quite obvious but the answer might be of general interest. If I fit a fixed effect with an added quadratic term and then do it as an orthogonal polynomial using maximum likelihood I get the expected result- they have the same logLik.

I can't find a way to retrieve z values and p-values from the output from lmer in the lme4 package. How is this done? Rick B.

Hi, I have been having a tedious issue with lmer models with lots of factors and lots of levels. In order to get the basic information at the beginning of the print out I also have to generate these enormous tables as well. Is there a method command to leave off all of the effects and correlations? Or, do I have to go to string commands?

I'm having a problem getting W95 and WNT to correctly read file names on a samba server I set up. The server passed all of the diagnostics, and file names show up correctly in a dos window. However, under windows explorer, anything after a . doesn't show up in the name. This is only true for a . in the middle of the name, "hidden" files such as .fvwmrc show up. WE does

Dear R users, I've been struggling with the following problem: I want to extract the Wald p-value from an lmer() fit, i.e., consider library(lme4) n <- 120 x1 <- runif(n, -4, 4) x2 <- sample(0:1, n, TRUE) z <- rnorm(n) id <- 1:n N <- sample(20:200, n, TRUE) y <- rbinom(n, N, plogis(0.1 + 0.2 * x1 - 0.5 * x2 + 1.5 * z)) m1 <- lmer(cbind(y, N - y) ~ x1 + x2 + (1 | id),

Hello All, I would like to retrieve some of the results from the lmer(...) function in library lme4. If I run a model, say fm.1 <- lmer(y ~ 1 + (1 | x), data = dog) and try names(fm.1), I get NULL. Is there anyway to retrieve the information? Thanks

Dear R-Helpers, I want to compare the results of outputs from glmmPQL and lmer analyses. I could do this if I could extract the coefficients and standard errors from the summaries of the lmer models. This is easy to do for the glmmPQL summaries, using > glmm.fit <- try(glmmPQL(score ~ x*type, random = ~ 1 | subject, data = df, family = binomial), TRUE) > summary(glmmPQL.fit)$tTable