similar to: Representative curves

Hi, I apologize for the previous posting, where the message was not formatted properly. Here is a better version: I have written the following function to check whether a vector has elements satisfying monotonicity. is.monotone <- function(vec, increase=T){ ans <- TRUE vec.nomis <- vec[!is.na(vec)] if (increase & any(diff(vec.nomis,1) < 0, na.rm=T)) ans <- FALSE

Hi, I would like to know whether there exist algorithms to compute the coefficients or, at least, the degree of the minimal polynomial of a square matrix A (over the field of complex numbers)? I don't know whether this would require symbolic computation. If not, has any of the algorithms been implemented in R? Thanks very much, Ravi. P.S. Just for the sake of completeness, a

Hello, I want to find the roots of an equation in two variables. I am aware of the uniroot function, which can do this for a function with a single variable (as I understand it...) but cannot find a function that does this for an equation with more than one variable. I am looking for something implementing similar to a Newton-Raphson algorithm. Thanks. -- Bill Shipley North American Editor for

Dear R group, I have a data frame which contains data on preferences on 7 items (ranks 1 through 7) listed by each participant. I would like to tabulate this in a 7x7 table where the rows would be the items and the columns would be the number of times that item received a particular rank. I tried doing this by creating a matrix by "rbind"ing each vector obtained using

hello everyone, i'm trying to simulate a 2-parameter integrated ornstein-uhlenbeck (IOU) process, but i'm not sure exactly where to start (which package, which function). the motivation is the paper by taylor et. al. (JASA 1994) "a stochastic model for the analysis of longitudinal aids data." the model they suggest consists of a combination of fixed and random effects, a

Hi, I would like to solve a system of coupled ordinary differential equations, where there is a delay (time lag) term. I would like to use the "lsoda" function "odesolve" package. However, I am not sure how to specify the delay term using the syntax allowed by odesolve. Here is an example of the kind of problem that I am trying to solve: > library(odesolve)

Hi, I have a data file, certain lines of which are character fields. I would like to skip these rows, and read the data file as a numeric data frame. I know that I can skip lines at the beginning with read.table and scan, but is there a way to skip a specified sequence of lines (e.g., 1, 2, 10, 11, 19, 20, 28, 29, etc.) ? If I read the entire data file, and then delete the character

Hi, I apologize for this repeat posting, which I first posted yesterday. I would appreciate any hints on solving this problem: I have two matrices A (m x 2) and B (n x 2), where m and n are large integers (on the order of 10^4). I am looking for an efficient way to create another matrix, W (m x n), which can be defined as follows: for (i in 1:m){ for (j in 1:n) { W[i,j] <-

Dear R-users I would like to integrate something like \int_k^\infty (1 - F(x)) dx, where F(.) is a cumulative distribution function. As mentioned in the "integrate" help-page: integrate(dnorm,0,20000) ## fails on many systems. This does not happen for an adaptive Simpson or Lobatto quadrature (cf. Matlab). Even though I am hardly familiar with numerical integration the implementation

Hi, I have a simple problem that I would appreciate getting some tips. I am using the "truehist" function within an "apply" call to plot multiple histograms. I can't figure out how to get truehist to use the column names of the matrix as the labels for the x-axis of the histograms. Here is a simple example: X <- matrix(runif(4000),ncol=4) colnames(X)

i want to estimate parameters with maximum likelihood method with contraints (contant numbers). for example sum(Ai)=0 and sum(Bi)=0 i have done it without the constraints but i realised that i have to use the contraints. Without constraints(just a part-not complete): skellamreg_LL=function(parameters,z,design) { n=length(z); mu=parameters[1]; H=parameters[2]; Apar=parameters[3:10];

Hey fellas: I would like to integrate the following function: integrand <- function (x,t) { exp(-2*t)*(2*t)^x/(10*factorial(x)) } with respect to the t variable, from 0 to 10. The variable x here works as a parameter: I would like to integrate the said function for each value of x in 0,1,..,44. I have tried Vectorize to no avail. Thanks in advance, jose romero

Hi, Suppose I have a multivariate response Y (n x k) obtained at a set of predictors X (n x p). I would like to perform a linear regression taking into consideration the covariance structure of Y within each unit - this would be represented by a specified matrix V (k x k), assumed to be the same across units. How do I use "lm" to do this? One approach that I was thinking of

After attending my first useR! conference I want to thank the organizers for doing a wonderful job and the presenters for their high quality presentations and stimulating ideas. The conference venue was excellent and of course Vienna is one of the greatest cities in the world to visit. useR! is one of the most fun conferences I've attended. Thanks again! -- Frank E Harrell Jr

i'm trying to use the BB package to minimize the sum of the squared deviations for 2 vectors. The only thing am having trouble with is defining the project constraint. I got the upper and lower bounds to work but i am not sure how to create a constraint that the sum of x must be 1. Any help would be greatly appreciated. -- View this message in context:

Hi, I am trying to do the following computation: p <- rep(0, n) coef <- runif(K+1) U <- matrix(runif(n*(2*K+1)), n, 2*K+1) for (i in 0:K){ for (j in 0:K){ p <- p + coef[i+1]* coef[j+1] * U[,i+j+1] } } I would appreciate any suggestions on how to perform this computation efficiently without the "for" loops? Thank

Hi, I have noticed that there is a change in the use of ellipses or . in R versions 2.6.1 and later. In versions 2.5.1 and earlier, the . were always at the end of the argument list, but in 2.6.1 they are placed after the main arguments and before method control arguments. This results in the user having to specify the exact (complete) names of the control arguments, i.e. partial matching is

I am trying to maximise a complicated loglikelihood function with the "optim" command. Is there some way to get to know the estiamtes at each iteration? When I put "control=list(trace=TRUE)" as an option in "optim", I just got the initial and final values of the loglikelihood, number of iterations and whether the routine has converged or not. I need to know the

I'm solving the differential equation dy/dx = xy-1 with y(0) = sqrt(pi/2). This can be used in computing the tail of the normal distribution. (The actual solution is y(x) = exp(x^2/2) * Integral_x_inf {exp(-t^2/2) dt} = Integral_0_inf {exp (-xt - t^2/2) dt}. For large x, y ~ 1/x, starting around x~2.) I'm testing both lsoda and rk4 from the package odesolve. rk4 is accurate using step

Dear UseRs!, Everything about UseR! 2010 was terrific! I really mean "everything" - the tutorials, invited talks, kaleidoscope sessions, focus sessions, breakfast, snacks, lunch, conference dinner, shuttle services, and the participants. The organization was fabulous. NIST were gracious hosts, and provided top notch facilities. The rousing speech by Antonio Possolo, who is the chief