similar to: mac osx, g95 package port problem

Hi all, (Originally posted to r-help) I'm porting a package that I've worked on for OS X to Windows. The package is written in F95 so I need to compile it with gfortran and link it with gcc4. I've been trying to build an R with gcc4 without luck so far. If there is a binary of such a thing info would be appreciated. This package requires a Makefile. My question is, how can I find

Hi all, I'm porting a package that I've worked on for OS X to Cygwin/Windows. This package requires a Makefile. My question is, how can I find out (or what is), the link command? Here is the OS X Makefile: RLIB_LOC=${R_HOME} F90_FILES=\ class_data_frame.f90 \ class_old_dbest.f90 \ class_cm_data.f90 \ class_cm.f90 \ class_bgw.f90 \ class_cm_mle.f90 \ cme.f90 FORTRAN_FILES=\ dgletc.f

I'm not looking for an answer here, this is just a report of a peculiar event I've observed and can reproduce. I'm developing a g95 (20050129) compiled package on windows xp pro using R-2.1.1, and gcc-3.4.2 (mingw special). An older version of the F95 package compiled and ran without problems. The new version of the package includes extensive changes in the code. The package has a

Hi: We're trying to install the Hmisc package on a Solaris 9 machine. Here's what we get: R CMD INSTALL /usr/local/srctree/Hmisc_3.4-2.tar.gz * Installing to library '/usr/local/lib/R/library' * Installing *source* package 'Hmisc' ... ** libs g95 -fPIC -g -O2 -c cidxcn.f -o cidxcn.o g95 -fPIC -g -O2 -c cidxcp.f -o cidxcp.o g95 -fPIC -g -O2 -c hoeffd.f -o

Colleagues, I am preparing scripts that will be used by others on both Windows and Linux/OSX platforms. The scripts call an existing Fortran application. The user may have any of a a variety of Fortran compilers - my goal is to determine whether or not the test command returns "no input files" or "command not found" (i.e., so that I can confirm which Fortran they

I'm sorry for having to post this, but I've run out of ideas. I've been trying to build R-2.8.1 from source for installation on FreeBSD 6.4 (seems to be working fine on osx) and keep getting the same results, regardless of how I set ./configure $ ./configure --enable-R-shlib --with-x=no --with-blas FFLAGS="-fpic" R is now configured for x86_64-unknown-freebsd6.0 Source

Hi all, I have Win XP and R 2.3.1 on my notebook. I would like to write a package which includes some Fortran 95 code. Interestingly, if I compile and link the simple file test90.f90 directly with g95 -c test90.f90 g95 -shared -o test90.dll test90.o then PE Viewer ( a dll viewer) shows me the right functions in the export table, hence I can use the dll in R. But as it should become part of a

To all. I need your help. The big question is: How do I make an R library with Fortran 95 files? You may assume that I am a pretty decent programmer in both R and Fortran. I lay out a scenario and need your help! I know how to make an ordinary R package and have dabbled with R + Fortran 95 *.dll linking. I do not have a great handle on the whole Makevars file and whatever else I might need

Another option might be g95 instead of gfortran. I haven't used it for a while, but I seem to recall it working fine in gcc 4.0.1. On 9/11/06, Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken at gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/9/06, Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 9/9/06, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 9/9/06, Chris

Hello! Has anyone successfully compiled F90 sources in R-package? I found the same question on r-devel list from 2002 and I wonder if there is any progress. I heard that g95 and gfortran can be usable. And one more thing. I have a program written in F90 and lets suppose that compiler is not a problem. I've read manual 'Writing R Extensions' and successfully loaded one F77 subroutine

Hello! Has anyone successfully compiled F90 sources in R-package? I found the same question on r-devel list from 2002 and I wonder if there is any progress. I heard that g95 and gfortran can be usable. And one more thing. I have a program written in F90 and lets suppose that compiler is not a problem. I've read manual 'Writing R Extensions' and successfully loaded one F77 subroutine

Is it possible to run Fortran 95 code from R? I don't think so, but hopefully someone can prove me wrong. Here is the test I tried: A little fortran 95 subroutine: subroutine allloc() real, dimension(:, :), allocatable :: a integer :: n n = 10 allocate(a(n,n+1)) end I then compiled: >g95 -c allloc.f >R CMD SHLIB allloc.o Here is what happens when I try to dyn.load it in R 2.1.0

Is it possible to run Fortran 95 code from R? I don't think so, but hopefully someone can prove me wrong. Here is the test I tried: A little fortran 95 subroutine: subroutine allloc() real, dimension(:, :), allocatable :: a integer :: n n = 10 allocate(a(n,n+1)) end I then compiled: >g95 -c allloc.f >R CMD SHLIB allloc.o Here is what happens when I try to dyn.load it in R 2.1.0

Hi, I have many printers installed under cups on a samba server, so the printers can be used and installed on Mac and PCs. My problem appeared with some new printers I bought and their PPDs. Under Cups, all the PPD options (Page Sizes, Trays, etc..) appear if I looked at them from the cups printer configuration page or if I use it from a Mac. But if I install the printers under windows

Hi all, I'm trying to debug some fortran 95 code that I'm bringing in with a dyn.load(). I'm compiling a number of files using g95 on intel linux w/ R 2.1.0. The .so file loads without complaint, but when I try to call it I get a seg fault. I was hoping I could get a core dump in order to get some more clues about what is going on, but no luck. I'm relatively new to fortran

From the configure output of the latest devel snapshot: > checking for g77... no > checking for f77... no > checking for xlf... no > checking for frt... no > checking for pgf77... no > checking for fl32... no > checking for af77... no > checking for fort77... no > checking for f90... no > checking for xlf90... no > checking for pgf90... no > checking for

I have gotten this error while attempting to build R-2.13.2 and R-2.14.0 using ./configure --with-x=no --enable-R-shlib, and ./configure --with-x=no Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.6 (Tikanga) ========================= Warning in solve.default(rgb) : unable to load shared object '/users/home/mked/R-2.13.2/modules//lapack.so': /users/home/mked/R-2.13.2/lib/libRlapack.so:

Hi. I'm a big user of level plots. Because filled.contour() didn't do exactly what I wanted, I hacked at it a bit to add these options: (*) Even spacing in the key, even if the contours are not evenly spaced. (*) Horizontal key (*) options to not use layout() and to plot only the level plot _or_ only the key. This means you can use layout yourself to (e.g.) have several

Dear All, No-one seemed to know about this on r-help, so I'm trying here.... I'm having problems at the configure stage when trying to build R on Solaris 5.8. configure finds everything it needs but when it runs config.status to make all the Makefiles and headers, I get a huge slew of errors like this: config.status: creating src/extra/zlib/Makefile sed: -e expression #1, char 329:

I'm trying to impute data using the mi package, but after running through almost the entire first round of imputations (which takes quite a while), it throws this error (I'll include the whole output prior to the error for context). Does anyone know what is causing it, or how I can fix it? More specifically, how can I tell what is throwing the error so I know what to fix? Is