similar to: latest 4.2 to 4.3 upgrade and distribution by CentOS team

On 05/16/2015 04:18 PM, Peter Lawler wrote: > People monitoring your connection know what you've updated, and what you > haven't, thus knowing what you may be vulnerable to, is a problem. If I'm monitoring your https connection: I know the list of mirrors. That's public information. I know when updates are released. That's also public. I know when you last

I currently have a single server with a few SIP and IAX upstreams for origination and termination with IAX clients. I am adding a second server that will have a much higher capacity and will be handling a larger call volume. However, this second server is not going to be geographically near the first. It will largely share the same upstreams. I would like for this to be an integrated system

Just to clarify, I'm looking at this from an application layer Point of View. One of the reasons why I'm looking at it that way, is because Tim said he was looking at LinuxHA..."application level" redundancy that uses IP. Tim, just to let you know, I don't believe that LinuxHA will work in the way you described, only because of the different IP ranges. It looks like Linux

What I would like to do is have two identical * servers which accept registrations of sip extensions 4000-4999. If I define a rrDNS or LinuxHA then I should have load-balanced registrations. However, say ext. 4001 is registered on *1 and 4002 is registered on *2, if 4001 tries to call 4002 then I would like to do something like: - lookup 4002 on *1, try to establish a call if it's

I have a IBM XSeries 366 with 04 processors Intel Xeon 3.16 Ghz, 16 Gb of memory and a storage IBM with 2 terabytes. I work with virtualization and my OS in this machine is a VMware ESX 2.5.3 version. When I install CentOS 4.X as guest operating system under ESX, the performance is very very bad. When I intsall RHES4 as guest operating system under ESX, the performance is very good. It will

Hello, does anybody know what's the maximum file size (terabytes?) when using rsync with options --checksum and / or --inplace? What file sizes have been tested in reality? Are there any experiences using rsync (with --checksum and / or --inplace) for big files with several / dozens or terabytes? Thanks a lot, Heinz-Josef Claes

It turns out that the release of Centos-3.3 was so popular, that it threw us way over the threshold of our ISP's, and now we are stuck with a _very_ large bill (as in an estimated 6TB of transfers). While in one hand I am ecstatic that we are so successful, but on the other hand, that is coming out of the developers pockets. The developers should be the last ones footing these bills (and this

Which is better? Why? I know yum is the official update mechanism here and in Fedora Core, but that doesn't make yum better than up2date any more than Windows NT was better than OS/2. Let's try to keep the discussion objective:-) I'm asking, hoping for some insights into why RH might (apparently) be moving to yum in preference to up2date (yum is now used within Anaconda). Other

Am 11.07.24 um 12:47 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > Hi Stefan, I do not use use btrfs, so I cannot fully answer your > question, but a quick internet search using 'samba btrfs quota' turned > up this Samba bug: > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10541 > > Perhaps that will help. thank you. Hmm. I learned about vfs_btrfs now and set up a test share

-------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "Petr \"Qaxi\" Klima" <qaxi at seznam.cz> Subject: Re: [Centos] Release of centos-3.3 ISP bill Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 07:56:24 +0200 Size: 2686 URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20041027/6185ecd0/attachment-0003.mht>

Hey, I thought I had been paying attention, but I do not know what is going on. On the mirrors, under centos-3, we now have directories named 3.1, 3.2 & 3.3. The CentOS-3 I have been using for some months came from 3.1. The 3.2 directory is dated September 11th and seems to be empty. The 3.3 directory is dated September 16th and has stuff in it, such as rpm's, but no header files

So, if I have a 50,000 flac files with perfect metadata encoded with <=1.1.2, I should... find . -type f -name "*.flac" -exec flac -8 {} \; -print And come back to my computer in about 24-48 hours? I've tested it on a small dir tree and it seemed to be fine. I just wanted to make sure though, before having to re-tag a couple terabytes of data. This is actually a serious

I'm interested in large file system replication capability of rsync. Could some of you people who use it share how large their mirroring is? What would you say is the largest sized site being mirrored using rsync? Thanks! JP

hi - i just started using R as i am trying to figure out how perform a linear regression on a huge matrix. i am sure this topic has passed through the email list before but could not find anything in the archives. i have a matrix that is 2,000,000 x 170,000 the values right now are arbitray. i try to allocate this on a x86_64 machine with 16G of ram and i get the following: > x <-

Hi all, Our company is contemplating moving all our file server services from Novell to a Samba implementation on HPUX, using HP's CIFS/9000 product. CIFS/9000 is essentially Samba with a nice installation package wrapped around it. I have several concerns about this, partially about HP's setup and claims about Samba, and partially about moving everything from 40 Novell to 1 Samba

> On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 14:39 +0000, Leroy Tennison wrote: >> Since you state that using -z is almost always a bad idea, could you >> provide the rationale for that? I must be missing something. >> > I think the "rationale" is that at some point the > compression/decompression takes longer than the time reduction from > sending a compressed file. It

Hey guys, So, we're testing Gluster RDMA storage, and are having some issues. Things are working...just not as we expected them. THere isn't a whole lot in the way, that I've foudn on docs for gluster rdma, aside from basically "install gluster-rdma", create a volume with transport=rdma, and mount w/ transport=rdma.... I've done that...and the IB fabric is known to be

Hi, all. I'm intending to install CentOS 7 on a HP Elitebook 8460p. Does anybody have any experience of this? Many thanks for any help. Cheers, Phil...

On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 19:19:44 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > today I migrated a customer to a new samba-domain-member/file-server > > The main shares are based on btrfs-subvolumes. > > The admin there wants to limit the visible space to discipline the > users ... > > I created a quota group in btrfs and

> I'm a denizen of the solr-user at lucene.apache.org mailing list. > [...] > Here's a wiki page that I wrote about that topic. This wiki is going > away next month, but for now you can still access it: > > https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceProblems That's a great resource, Shawn. I am about to put together a test case to provide a comprehensive FTS