similar to: Build problems

This doesn't build on G++ 3.0 - are we still trying to support that? If not, I'll have to get a more recent toolchain sorted out. J -- /--------------------------------------------------------------------------\ James Aylett xapian.org james at tartarus.org uncertaintydivision.org

bugzilla-daemon@ixion.tartarus.org wrote: > http://www.xapian.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117 > > ------- Additional Comments From olly@survex.com 2007-04-05 13:52 ------- > I've actually already implemented a fix. If bugzilla stops sending me mail, I > might even manage to check it in soon! Sorry Olly - just about finished sorting things out now! For everyone

I've been wondering if we should consider migrating from CVS to Subversion (aka SVN) for version control. There's a utility (cvs2svn) to convert a CVS repository while keeping full history. And SVN is supported by viewcvs (as used by http://cvs.xapian.org/) The main motivations are: * CVS doesn't really handle renaming files well. Either you "cvs rm" then "cvs

hi i?m trying to build the ruby bindings in xapian 1.1.2 on win xp. i?ve 1. pulled the tags/1.1.2 revision from svn 2. built SWIG from repo via MinGW and MSYS (swig -help works, so build seems ok to me) 3. built xapian-core following readme in ...\win32msvc, apitest doesn?t give errors now if i try to build: "...\ruby>nmake SWIGBUILD=1 Microsoft (R) Program

> Is that the complete output? Yes it is the complete output against "./runtest ./apitest --verbose topercent2"( after running make remove-cached-databases). I attached the snapshot of the output of commands but the size of the email got bigger than 40kb so i had to place the output as text. If I do not run "make remove-cached-databases" and run "./runtest ./apitest

Please find my inline reply. On 26 January 2015 at 06:56, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 06:46:26PM +0500, Saad Ahmed wrote: > > I have been able to successfully build the code. But when I run the > > existing testcases (to verify everthing is working fine), It says 3 out > of > > the six testcases fails. Here is the report of the

Dear Olly Betts, same 32 bit compiler version hardware OS OS version as here (where remotetcp_chert passed and skipped 3) xapian-core-1.2.21.tar.xz http://nurmi-labs.blogspot.com/2015/10/xapian.html ./apitest backend remoteprog_brass: All 225 tests passed, 3 skipped. ./apitest backend remotetcp_brass: All 225 tests passed, 3 skipped. ./apitest backend remoteprog_chert: All 225 tests passed,

Hi, I am a student in Pakistan willing to contribute to Xapian. I have been able to successfully build the code. But when I run the existing testcases (to verify everthing is working fine), It says 3 out of the six testcases fails. Here is the report of the test cases. "... make check-TESTS make[5]: Entering directory `/home/saad/GitProjects/xapian/build/xapian-core/tests' Running

Hi All. After one false start, I now have a Tinderbox up and running for the OpenSSH portable tree. For those not familiar with it, Tinderbox is a tool for automatically displaying the status of builds and tests. At the moment, I do 1 update and 4 builds hourly. It's not fully functional yet but the basics work. It can be found at http://dodgynet.dyndns.org/tinderbox/OpenSSH_Portable/ (I

We've lost tinderbox (last build 25th), which is presumably why the following wasn't caught: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /s1/james/projects/xapian/xapian/xapian-core/extra/queryparser.yy: In function `int yylex()': /s1/james/projects/xapian/xapian/xapian-core/extra/queryparser.yy:443: `class std::basic_string<char,

TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:14 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:14 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:14 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:32 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:32 - /usr/bin/csup -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s /tinderbox/RELENG_7/sparc64/sparc64/supfile TB ---

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Saad Ahmed <ch.saad.ahmed at gmail.com> Date: 3 February 2015 at 21:10 Subject: Waiting for Reply regarding "TestCases Failure" To: Xapian Development <xapian-devel at lists.xapian.org> I have been waiting for reply regarding any further steps to take. Following are the outputs of commands that you asked me to run. All these

If the subject of xapian-core apitests on MSYS/MINGW and MSYS2/MINGW is taken up it might be noted that the compiler version could be recorded, probably gcc 5.3.0 or newer, that closed pipes might be an issue, and also allocating for the location of xapian-tcpsrv. Not from my own tests but another man informed there was some problems with [MSYS2] python bindings. I am not knowledgeable of the

With the new "stamp" rules for running SWIG, things don't seem to get rebuilt when I expect them to, e.g.: olly at ixion:~/svn/xapian/xapian-bindings/python $ make modern/xapian_wrap.cc make: Nothing to be done for `modern/xapian_wrap.cc'. olly at ixion:~/svn/xapian/xapian-bindings/python $ ls -l modern/xapian_wrap.cc ls: modern/xapian_wrap.cc: No such file or directory Problem

TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:12 - starting RELENG_4 tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:12 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/pc98 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_4 src TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:12 - /usr/bin/cvs returned exit code 1 TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:12 - ERROR: unable to check out the source tree TB ---

TB --- 2008-08-27 11:26:00 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-08-27 11:26:00 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2008-08-27 11:26:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-08-27 11:26:30 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-08-27 11:26:30 - /usr/bin/csup -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s /tinderbox/RELENG_7/amd64/amd64/supfile TB --- 2008-08-27

Please find my inline reply. On 27 January 2015 at 03:02, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > > The script which automates most of the release process runs "make > distcheck", which runs the testsuite, so these tests didn't fail for me > when I made the 1.3.2 release. > > When I run "make distcheck" in the "build" folder, it gives

Tinderbox is showing failures in Search::Xapian on atreus with g++ 4.1 (which looks like tests out of date at a *very* cursory examination, and in any case everyone should know about); I'm also getting different test failures on the same system -- valgrind (I assume) is finding potential memory leaks for every test against the remotetcp backend. (Incidentally, I've just installed

TB --- 2008-06-03 08:42:30 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-06-03 08:42:30 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2008-06-03 08:42:30 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-06-03 08:43:09 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-06-03 08:43:09 - /usr/bin/csup -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s /tinderbox/RELENG_6/i386/i386/supfile TB --- 2008-06-03 08:43:22

TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:11 - starting RELENG_4 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:11 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_4 src TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:11 - /usr/bin/cvs returned exit code 1 TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:11 - ERROR: unable to check out the source tree TB ---