similar to: Bug and patch for +terms with wildcards

--- search-xapian/XS/QueryParser.xs | 6 ++++++ search-xapian/Xapian/QueryParser.pm | 7 +++++++ xapian-core/include/xapian/queryparser.h | 3 +++ xapian-core/queryparser/queryparser.cc | 6 ++++++ xapian-core/queryparser/queryparser.lemony | 9 +++++++++ xapian-core/queryparser/queryparser_internal.h | 4 +++- 6 files changed, 34

Hello, include <iostream>#include <string>#include <xapian.h>struct document{ std::string title; std::string content; std::string url;}; void indexData(document d) { try { Xapian::WritableDatabase db("/Users/ramesh/Desktop/xapian", Xapian::DB_CREATE_OR_OPEN); Xapian::TermGenerator indexer; Xapian::Stem

Hello, include <iostream>#include <string>#include <xapian.h>struct document{ std::string title; std::string content; std::string url;}; void indexData(document d) { try { Xapian::WritableDatabase db("/Users/ramesh/Desktop/xapian", Xapian::DB_CREATE_OR_OPEN); Xapian::TermGenerator indexer; Xapian::Stem

Hi, I'm using xapian to build my search engine, but met with a problem. The code snippet is like: ----------------------Code begin------------------------------------------------------------- Xapian::QueryParser qp; qp.add_prefix("Singer", "S"); Xapian::Query query = qp.parse_query("Singer:s.h.e",

Hi, I am currently trying to benchmark a multithreaded xapian implementation on a chameleon baremetal instance written in C++. My workload is a 3 Gig wikipedia xml dump consisting of ~286 file of different sizes. My results are showing me that indexing on xapian is an order of magnitude faster than my lucene and lucene plusplus implementations. This is a result that I did not expect. Just want to

Hello, can I get an explanation of the following. Running the following code: .... pqp=new QueryParser(); Stem stem("norwegian"); cout << "DEBUG " << stem.stem_word(_sXapian)<< endl; pqp->set_stemmer(stem); pqp->set_database(*_pdatabase); pqp->set_default_op(Query::OP_AND); //Set the

Hi, When we use OP_ELITE_SET we can specify the number of terms we want to use. In http://trac.xapian.org/wiki/FAQ/EliteSet there is this text: "The number of terms which OP_ELITE_SET will use defaults to 10 (or ceil(sqrt(number_of_subqueries)) if there are more than 100 subqueries), but may be set by specifying a parameter to the query constructor" is it possible to use only the

mple (see attachment). > > Attachments get stripped out by the mailing list, so I?ve made a private gist of the two files here: <https://gist.github.com/jaylett/ce8455b37e2b84422346>. > > Actually, when I run it I get 0 matches, which would explain why you?re just getting the start of the document. However if I adjust things (match the stemming strategy for TermGenerator to

Hi everyone, I tried sending a message as a reply a while back on my previous topic, but it didn't go through. (Tried Gmane), not even when I 'authorized' the reply. So I'll just paste it here for reference, below this message. It might help some people. But now I have one other small problem, and I'm not sure if it is actually my mistake (although I'm pretty sure it is

Hello, I'm wondering about how the QueryParser parses a query containing an "alias" when the default operator is OP_AND (by "alias", I mean a search field mapped to multiple term prefixes). With the following php code : <?php $parser=new XapianQueryParser(); $parser->set_default_op(XapianQuery::OP_AND); $parser->add_prefix('alias', 'AUT1:');

Hi, I've a problem to integrate xapian in my web application. I've developed the code for index e for search the documents published through my application. The app is developed in PHP. I've created a file that contain some function for search (called simpleSearch and advSearch). The problem is that if i run the code through the IDE (Zend for Eclipse) as PHP script it work correctly,

Hello, With PHP, I try to get spelling corrections but after 2 days of trying I can make it work !!! Here is my < simple > code : <?php require_once( '../global.info.php' ); require_once( 'xapian.class.php' ); require_once( 'xapianencode.func.php' ); // Open the database for searching. try { $database = new XapianDatabase(

I've got a small test database setup with one record. $ delve -r 1 -V /tmp/1/ Values for record #1: 0:DD4F2162FFFF0E43741A4A1C2B8EC0E7 1:./Text_page_scan_2.jpg 2:jpg 3:.jpg Term List for record #1: E:.jpg P:./Text_page_scan_2.jpg Q:DD4F2162FFFF0E43741A4A1C2B8EC0E7 T:jpg The terms were added with lines like this: doc.add_term(string("P:") + path); Problem is, I can't seem to

Hi guys I'm trying to figure out how I can use probabilistic searching on a given field within a document; I've written to the list about this before, but haven't quite figured out what's required and, following a little research, I think I understand what I need to do but I'd like a clarification on this. o We have a database of a number of documents, with fields: title,

Very few people seem to be using synonym in Xapian, I recently found some problems in the use of synonyms. Normally, I think we should not contain any prefix info in synonym table except that 'Z'. For example, I have the following synonyms and prefix info: db.add_synonym("search", "find"); db.add_synonym("Zsearch", "Zfind");

Hi all, I''m working on the EventLog#read method for the pure Ruby version of win32-eventlog, but I''m stuck on the get_description private method. Here are the problems: * I don''t think I''m advancing the EVENTLOGRECORD properly between iterations. Take a look at the end of the "while dwread > 0" loop. I get some records, but not all of them.

I don't know whether this is a BUG or for special purpose... According to the definition of "xapian/queryparser.h", FLAG_AUTO_MULTIWORD_SYNONYMS contains bit of FLAG_AUTO_SYNONYMS . Therefore, long as I set the parse flag with FLAG_AUTO_SYNONYMS, the query parser will automatically activate the function of FLAG_AUTO_MULTIWORD_SYNONYMS. See the below source code part from

Hi to all, First, I would like to say a big thank you for the work which was done on my 'wish bug' to allow mapping one field to multiple prefixes (http://www.xapian.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93). That's great! I have upgraded to 1.0.4 and I am revisiting my code, replacing the php query parser I wrote with Xapian's one. Everything works well, but I have some

Please keep replies on-list so everyone can help and benefit. Begin forwarded message: > From: Greg <freediving at gmail.com> > >>> We're using it this way: >>> xq = qp.ParseQuery(query, (uint)Xapian.QueryParser.feature_flag.FLAG_PARTIAL); >>> The op is AND and the get_description is fairly long (I removed some >>> of it since there is a limit

I've been getting excellent performance out of xapian but when searches on phrases of common terms such as [ "north america" ] or [ "art history" ] get run it will take a very long time to come up with results. Examples: ------------------------------ [ south africa ] -- 10379 results found in ~.2 sec [ white house ] -- 17988 results found in <1 sec Quoting either of