similar to: term / posting question

I've got a small test database setup with one record. $ delve -r 1 -V /tmp/1/ Values for record #1: 0:DD4F2162FFFF0E43741A4A1C2B8EC0E7 1:./Text_page_scan_2.jpg 2:jpg 3:.jpg Term List for record #1: E:.jpg P:./Text_page_scan_2.jpg Q:DD4F2162FFFF0E43741A4A1C2B8EC0E7 T:jpg The terms were added with lines like this: doc.add_term(string("P:") + path); Problem is, I can't seem to

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 07:19:43PM -0700, Kevin Duraj wrote: > I would like to propose to change the following code while indexing a > term that is larger than 245 characters and then crashing and aborting > the entire index, we could rather truncate the term to 245 characters > and continue with indexing. Kevin -- I wonder what others are currently doing when this comes up (or if

Hi, I'm using Xapian bindings for Python in my project. How could I use a custom stemmer instead of the included one (Snowball)? The one I'm looking at right now is Hunspell (http://hunspell.sourceforge.net/) which has Python bindings (http://code.google.com/p/pyhunspell/). Thanks in advance, Eugene

I'm not entirely sure if the following is possible with xapian (didn't see much in the way of the documentation that says it is). I have four fields which reference a PK in our DB that I'd like to index (in most weighted to least weighed order): full name, e-mail, title and location. I see I how I can use add_document() to add a concatenated string of the 4 fields, but how would I

OK, I'm indexing my data with the scriptindex. I want to be able to restrict the search by the category field. Do I need to do anything to the data itself? Like, literally prefix it with the characters "XC"? Below is my indexor for scriptindex and the my php code... document_id : field=ref unique=Q boolean=Q search_id : field=document_id index=S document_title : field=title

Hi, I need to modify the stemming for a couple of words (a blacklist) and for all the other to use the usual snowball stemmer. The "natural" way of doing it would be to derive from Stem and override operator ()... but I am using *python-bindings*. Would this be possible? If not I have two other solutions in mind: - add a custom stemmer to Xapian - write custom index & search

Why there still been rank when using Query::MatchAll() ?

I've just found some items in my Xapian database which aren't being indexed, when the terms are quite long. Example term: Frotherham_doncaster_and_south_humber_mental_health_nhs_foundation_trust It represents that the Freedom of Information request was made to a particular public body. It results in pages like this not correctly showing results:

i use the perl interface of Search::Xapian to index documents, now i got metadata i store with the index like title, date, author, .. and i wonder how to retrieve them from the index again without pulling them from the database. i am pretty sure this is a stupid question and that the answer is obvious i dont seem to be able to find it. regards m

mple (see attachment). > > Attachments get stripped out by the mailing list, so I?ve made a private gist of the two files here: <https://gist.github.com/jaylett/ce8455b37e2b84422346>. > > Actually, when I run it I get 0 matches, which would explain why you?re just getting the start of the document. However if I adjust things (match the stemming strategy for TermGenerator to

Hi, I''m having difficulty getting the StemFilter and PhraseQuery to work properly together. When I use a StemFilter with a PhraseQuery, searches only work if the phrase consists of stems. For example, the search phrase "reduces health care" will not work but the phrase "reduce health care" will work even though the exact text "reduces health care" is

i used to use document.add_term("term"); to associate document with a term that did not appear in html, but add_term function might have changed, as i no longer get results for associated terms. what would be the new way to do it ? Thank You

Dear, guys: I am a beginner of Xapian, when reading the documents, I encountered follow questions. (1) I see the Xapian::Document has a method void add_value (Xapian::valueno valueno, const std::string &value) What's the purpose of this method? Document will related to the terms, but what's the purpose of this? (2) add_posting method will add term to a documents. void

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:02:56PM -0700, Kevin Duraj wrote: > You are saying that when I search for "delve Xapian 1.4" on Google, a > company worth of 491 Billion of Dollars and you saying that their top > of the search result has nothing to do with Xapian. > > https://www.google.com/search?q=xapian+delve&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8#q=delve+xapian+1.4 Well, I'm not

hi, i am newbie to xapian and am trying to get started with it in python. there is no stemmer.stem_word method in the latest python library. how do i stem words before doing doc.add_posting? is there any sample hello world code in python that i can use? thanks a lot! >>> stemmer = xapian.Stem('english') >>> stemmer. stemmer.__call__

Hi, I try to use XapianMatchDecider to filtering results, but the code : $Decider = new MatchDecider_Search($XapianDatabase->_cPtr); $mset = $XapEnquire->get_mset(0, 3000, null, $Decider); Always return : PHP Fatal error: No matching function for overloaded 'Enquire_get_mset' in xapian.php on line 1082 I saw that SWIG was not supporting Directors for PHP, but now, it seems to

It is there: https://github.com/sidmutha/xapian/blob/master/xapian-core/api/Makefile.mk#L53 On an other note, I'm trying to run ./bootstrap from the cloned repo. But it gives an error saying "unknown option -C" followed by "Bootstrap failed". *Siddhant Mutha* Undergraduate Student Department of Computer Science and Engineering IIT Madras Chennai

PHRASE QUERY Xapian::Query((MBOX:12345678-1234-1234-1234-1234567890ab AND (LP:backup:(pos=1) PHRASE 6 LP:c::(pos=2) PHRASE 6 LP:program files:(pos=3) PHRASE 6 LP:Mozilla Firefox:(pos=4) PHRASE 6 LP:res:(pos=5) PHRASE 6 LP: table-add-column-after-hover.gif:(pos=6)))) AND QUERY Xapian::Query((MBOX:12345678-1234-1234-1234-1234567890ab AND LP:backup:(pos=1) AND LP:c::(pos=2) AND LP:program

Hello, I have found that the use of sort_by_value very slow. 16800 result, return to the previous 10, sorting takes about 25ms. And if you do not sort, returns 10, need only about 0.3ms. How to make the sort faster? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:33:08PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > > Hey all, I've been using ->add_database for a few years > > to tie sharded DBs together and it works great. > > > > Now, I want to be able to search across several DBs > > which aren't sharded, say: linux-DB, glibc-DB, freebsd-DB. > >