similar to: How to rebuild python-bindings using SWIG

There are two issues with rpmbuild xapian-bindings-0.9.5. xapian.pyo is missing in the source package but it is defined in xapian-bindings.spec. After removing the following line from xapian-bindings.spec I could finish rpmbuild without error. %ghost %{_libdir}/python%{python_ver}/site-packages/xapian.pyo csharp binding is turned on by default in xapian-bindings.spec. As you know csharp

Hello all, I am interested in the project: SWIG-based java bindings. It says a few things of Java bindings generated by SWIG don't work. Could you point out which particular part does not work? -- Best Regards, Sabrina -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I recently wrote a post on installing "Git for Windows" on a legacy XP SP3 Home box. http://nurmi-labs.blogspot.com/2016/11/git.html I added some missing files from the MSYS2 packages which were removed for the downloadable "Git for Windows" installer and a compiler and some additional libraries. For other utilities (bison, flex, info, m4, make, and csh/tcsh), and code I

I just get the latest version of Xapian 1.2.2 and see that the Java bindings still aren't in a package. Do these work? I am trying to hack them into a package but I can't find where the actual swig -java command is being executed from to add the -package command. Any ideas? -- Jarrod Roberson www.vertigrated.com/blog

I have found that lower cased boolean operators such as "and" or "or" does not work. Of course I never forget setting FLAG_BOOLEAN_ANY_CASE flag. QP seems to treat them as terms. Just look at the following tests regardless of search results! $ python search.py -v woman AND man Performing query 'Xapian::Query((woman:(pos=1) AND man:(pos=2)))' 0 results

Hi, I'm confused about my licensing obligation with respect to the Xapian SWIG bindings. I've got a python wrapper that sits above the standard Xapian Python/SWIG bindings, and I wasn't sure if the *intent* of the Xapian team is that my python wrapper - and any code that also uses my wrapper also falls under GPLv2. It seems unclear if the FSF's position on dynamic linking in

Hi all, I'm getting an error in the smoketest. I'm using latest Swig and Python bindings from SVN-HEAD: File "smoketest.py", line 23, in <module> import xapian File "C:\work\xapian\xapian-SVN\xapian-core\win32\Release\Python\xapian.py", line 2099, in <module> ValueRangeProcessor.__call__ = ValueRangeProcessor.__call AttributeError: type

Hi, I've been lurking around the LLVM project for a couple of months now. The two recent threads about python bindings for LLVM ([1] and [2]), combined with the fact that I am looking for at GSoC project at the moment. Lead to the idea of making the "public" parts of LLVM SWIG[3]-friendly and basing a set of python bindings on this. My reasoning for doing it this way, is that it

If SWIG can be made to do a good job with Python/Ruby/Perl etc bindings around LLVM, I would be very interested in this. I'm personally interested in seeing both Python and Ruby bindings, and in having them be as easily maintained as possible. I think it would be interesting to see what the SWIG-style solution can do in this direction as opposed to the C-binding approach. If it results in

Hi, all! I want to change current RHEL 4.0 ES into CentOS 4.2 on Sun X4100 server. The server has SAS SCSI based two 2.5" hard disks. I could only install RHEL 4.0 Update 1 because the server is equipped with RHEL 4.0 Update 1's device driver only. I've included below the boot process messages concerned with SCSI controller. If it's possible for me to install CentOS 4.0 on my

To anyone on #llvm I'm sure I'm starting to sound like a broken record, but I'd just like to point out that for python bindings at least, you can quite easily manipulate the LLVM infrastructure via ctypes as a shared object / dll -- no C required! Those of us interested in talking to LLVM from Lisps, either Common Lisp (via CFFI) or a scheme like PLT/Mzscheme, can also use the shared

> but I'd just like to point out that for python bindings at least, you > can quite easily manipulate the LLVM infrastructure via ctypes as a > shared object / dll -- no C required! Those of us interested in talking ctypes brings with it it's own troubles. To use it in any non-trivial way, one must write enough non-trivial wrapper code in Python. Performance is also affected

Hi, I try to use XapianMatchDecider to filtering results, but the code : $Decider = new MatchDecider_Search($XapianDatabase->_cPtr); $mset = $XapEnquire->get_mset(0, 3000, null, $Decider); Always return : PHP Fatal error: No matching function for overloaded 'Enquire_get_mset' in xapian.php on line 1082 I saw that SWIG was not supporting Directors for PHP, but now, it seems to

I'm having a problem compiling the python 2.1 packages for release 0.9.1 - I get many errors along the lines of: ../../python/olde/xapian_wrap.cc: In function `PyObject* PySwigObject_repr(PySwigObject*)': ../../python/olde/xapian_wrap.cc:664: error: `PyString_FromFormat' undeclared (first use this function) On further investigation, the copies of xapian_wrap.cc in the olde and

Hi everyone, I've searched the mail archives and I haven't been able to find a solution to this. I want to subclass a MatchSpy in the Python bindings and have Enquire use it. However, when I try to do so, I get a TypeError raised. The following example illustrates this: >>> import xapian >>> database = xapian.Database(dbpath) >>> class

Hi I seem to be having a little trouble with libxenstat, and was wondering if the xenstat guys might be able to help. I''ve pulled the xen-unstable.hg tree and done a somewhat clean install (ie, post-make uninstall, as well as deleting the relevant libxenstat libraries). Next, I entered the tools/xenstat/libxenstat directory and modified the Makefile so that the shared libraries would

I wanted to update to CentOS 4.3 from CentOS 4.2. While updating packages using yum, there was serveral error messages, and I've found that some packages has not been updated. So I tried to update again but the packages would not be updated. I attached the messages shown below. Sungsoo Kim ------------------------------------------- [root at phobos ~]# yum update Setting up Update Process

Hi, I'm using Xapian bindings for Python in my project. How could I use a custom stemmer instead of the included one (Snowball)? The one I'm looking at right now is Hunspell (http://hunspell.sourceforge.net/) which has Python bindings (http://code.google.com/p/pyhunspell/). Thanks in advance, Eugene

Hello all, I am involved in a compiler project for Transport Triggered Architectures (think VLIW and you are pretty close), and we are considering using LLVM. Browsing the list archives, I noticed an announcement of Python bindings for LLVM 1.5. Does anyone know the current status of the bindings? -- Pertti

hi i?m trying to build the ruby bindings in xapian 1.1.2 on win xp. i?ve 1. pulled the tags/1.1.2 revision from svn 2. built SWIG from repo via MinGW and MSYS (swig -help works, so build seems ok to me) 3. built xapian-core following readme in ...\win32msvc, apitest doesn?t give errors now if i try to build: "...\ruby>nmake SWIGBUILD=1 Microsoft (R) Program