Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "CEBA-2011:1127 CentOS 5 i386 sendmail Update"
2011 Sep 22
0
CEBA-2011:1127 CentOS 5 x86_64 sendmail Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1127
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1127.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
65a32380742ba50bf026d27d31797481 sendmail-8.13.8-8.1.el5_7.x86_64.rpm
10f989de49074fc69f8a7ce9e4a0f38a sendmail-cf-8.13.8-8.1.el5_7.x86_64.rpm
2015 Mar 13
0
Apparent bug in logwatch's reporting of number of email by sendmail
ken wrote on 3/13/2015 11:36 AM:
> # rpm -q sendmail logwatch
> sendmail-8.13.8-8.1.el5_7
> logwatch-7.3-10.el5
>
> One host sends just one email per day, the daily logwatch report.
> Here's /var/log/maillog entries from yesterday (hostnames are changed
> to make designations in this conversation more intuitive):
>
> Mar 12 04:02:18 srchost sendmail[27151]:
2015 Mar 13
0
Apparent bug in logwatch's reporting of number of email by sendmail
> On 13 Mar 2015, at 18:13, ken <gebser at mousecar.com> wrote:
>
>> On 03/13/2015 01:06 PM, Blake Hudson wrote:
>> ken wrote on 3/13/2015 11:36 AM:
>>> # rpm -q sendmail logwatch
>>> sendmail-8.13.8-8.1.el5_7
>>> logwatch-7.3-10.el5
>>>
>>> One host sends just one email per day, the daily logwatch report.
>>>
2015 Mar 13
2
Apparent bug in logwatch's reporting of number of email by sendmail
# rpm -q sendmail logwatch
sendmail-8.13.8-8.1.el5_7
logwatch-7.3-10.el5
One host sends just one email per day, the daily logwatch report.
Here's /var/log/maillog entries from yesterday (hostnames are changed to
make designations in this conversation more intuitive):
Mar 12 04:02:18 srchost sendmail[27151]: t2C82Bjr027151: from=root,
size=2485, class=0, nrcpts=1,
2015 Mar 13
5
Apparent bug in logwatch's reporting of number of email by sendmail
On 03/13/2015 01:06 PM, Blake Hudson wrote:
> ken wrote on 3/13/2015 11:36 AM:
>> # rpm -q sendmail logwatch
>> sendmail-8.13.8-8.1.el5_7
>> logwatch-7.3-10.el5
>>
>> One host sends just one email per day, the daily logwatch report.
>> Here's /var/log/maillog entries from yesterday (hostnames are changed
>> to make designations in this conversation
2014 Dec 29
2
Fetchmail multiple instances increasing load average
Hi,
I?m running centos 5.7 with sendmail-8.13.8-8.1.el5_7,
fetchmail-6.3.6-4.el5 and procmail-3.22-17.1.el5.centos. My server is
having around 2000 mailboxes and this server used to fetch mails for all
these users using fetchmail from the other MX server. I?ve configured the
below cron job using webmin for downloading these mail
5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50,55 * * * *
2015 Mar 16
0
CEBA-2015:0684 CentOS 5 sendmail BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0684
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0684.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
e1f5816abdb9405b1710883216376a316ca1cd3a4945684ae8a659f10b098213 sendmail-8.13.8-10.el5_11.i386.rpm
2011 Dec 19
0
CEEA-2011:1840 CentOS 5 i386 cnic-kmod Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:1840
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1840.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
6b15cfd19e994e582df45bc668be8a65367a6bbaea78e6072ab1693ba45ea705 kmod-bnx2i-PAE-rhel5u7-2.7.0.3-1.el5_7.i686.rpm
2011 Dec 20
0
CESA-2011:1845 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 tomcat5 Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1845 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1845.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
948e359b85b743346f1474dc2983e41b1f9f27d5ee7f460a436c01f4c35e8cef tomcat5-5.5.23-0jpp.22.el5_7.i386.rpm
2015 Apr 17
2
Disable SSLv3 in sendmail in CentOS 5
RedHat released sendmail-8.13.8-10.el5_11.src.rpm which includes
sendmail-8.13.8-ssl-opts.patch which adds support for disabling SSLv3 and
SSLv2 in sendmail.cf
But as far as I can see there is no support in sendmail.mc - I can't see
how to compile sendmail.mc to get the required line ServerSSLOptions in
sendmail.cf
Does anyone know how to do this ?
--
Andrew Daviel, TRIUMF, Canada
2011 Oct 19
0
CESA-2011:1380 Critical CentOS 5 i386 java-1.6.0-openjdk Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1380 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1380.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
2a9257de63e8d6912120d260a78c7b54 java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.23.1.9.10.el5_7.i386.rpm
1413a1ec73bee83f83185f9c83a3fe94
2017 Mar 09
0
Up to date guide/information Sendmail SMTP Auth
On 03/08/2017 07:09 PM, Mark Weaver wrote:
> On 03/08/2017 06:42 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote:
> >
> > > On 03/08/2017 11:00 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> > >> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hello all,
> > >> >
> > >> > I've been googling my
2011 Sep 22
0
CESA-2011:1132 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 dbus Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1132 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1132.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
7acccc2daf191a81e39cb0aabd82163f dbus-1.1.2-16.el5_7.i386.rpm
d968d3da880ae1a9656d62b8a793e5af dbus-devel-1.1.2-16.el5_7.i386.rpm
2011 Nov 09
0
CESA-2011:1444 Important CentOS 5 i386 nss Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1444 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1444.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
0d6b110567126eaba97fd477a15b0b47 nss-3.12.10-7.el5_7.i386.rpm
2b660b70fa7c53eb9af77b4d5b4b6f2f nss-devel-3.12.10-7.el5_7.i386.rpm
2017 Mar 08
1
Up to date guide/information Sendmail SMTP Auth
On 03/08/2017 06:21 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 08.03.2017 um 22:57 schrieb Mark Weaver:
> > On 03/08/2017 11:00 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> >> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote:
>
> >> I wrote this article years ago:
> >>
> >> https://www.madboa.com/geek/sendmail-auth/
>
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > I followed your guide to the
2015 Apr 17
0
Disable SSLv3 in sendmail in CentOS 5
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015, Andrew Daviel wrote:
> RedHat released sendmail-8.13.8-10.el5_11.src.rpm which includes
> sendmail-8.13.8-ssl-opts.patch which adds support for disabling
> SSLv3 and SSLv2 in sendmail.cf
>
> But as far as I can see there is no support in sendmail.mc - I can't
> see how to compile sendmail.mc to get the required line
> ServerSSLOptions in
2017 Mar 08
0
Up to date guide/information Sendmail SMTP Auth
On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote:
> On 03/08/2017 11:00 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote:
>>
>> > Hello all,
>> >
>> > I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for
>> > up-to-date information on this matter, and have found
>> > information that is anywhere from 15 to 5
2017 Mar 08
0
Up to date guide/information Sendmail SMTP Auth
Am 08.03.2017 um 22:57 schrieb Mark Weaver:
> On 03/08/2017 11:00 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote:
>> I wrote this article years ago:
>>
>> https://www.madboa.com/geek/sendmail-auth/
> Hi Paul,
>
> I followed your guide to the letter, however I think it seems I missed
> something. When I test with telnet to port 25 this is
2010 Sep 26
1
Bugzilla 3.6.2 + sendmail + SELinux
Hello,
I have deployed Bugzilla 3.6.2 on CentOS 5 (with rpmforge perl-*
packages) and I have a problem with SELinux preventing mail being sent
via sendmail.
(see SELinux reports below, especially the second one)
When SELinux is in permissive mode, mail sending from Bugzilla is
working properly.
Has anybody got recent Bugzilla to work with SELinux on CentOS?
Thanks in advance!
Mathieu
2017 Mar 09
3
Up to date guide/information Sendmail SMTP Auth
On 03/08/2017 06:42 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote:
>
> > On 03/08/2017 11:00 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> >> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hello all,
> >> >
> >> > I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for
> >> > up-to-date information on this