similar to: CEBA-2011:0442 CentOS 5 i386 lapack Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0442 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0442.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: bfc9a587b79fc30e361a7c2ef746f3de blas-3.0-38.el5.i386.rpm 5073e395fcde830658e424fbb51c36b7 blas-3.0-38.el5.x86_64.rpm 5ecae0e616c6fc63827f9afc5d392405

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:0442 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0442.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: cca2608b2f4668c95167824c1f1a4479 blas-3.0-38.el5.i386.rpm bfe586404e95b3c18585ee211bfefe70 blas-devel-3.0-38.el5.i386.rpm 23e65b466c253bdd1691903c7e61d8c6

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:0442 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0442.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 0d648aea8bd62d0c20b72a534065b3b4 blas-3.0-38.el5.i386.rpm 06beed7a72fdadb8e325986f621af57c blas-3.0-38.el5.x86_64.rpm 7a640389990000ad4859731beca83959

Well, I've now tried just about every permutation I can think of - including using the ATLAS lapack (instead of generic), in various combinations with ACML, or generic BLAS, or ATLAS blas. No matter what I do, so long as I have lapack of any flavour, I get the 'stats error' with make check. And, it always seems to throw the error at the same point in the stats test file (an svd in

On 5/6/19 12:57 PM, Janne Blomqvist wrote: > On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 11:55 AM Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera at gmail.com> wrote: >> On 5/4/19 6:49 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: >>> On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 06:42:47PM +0200, Thomas K?nig wrote: >>>>> - figure out Fortran2003 specification for C/Fortran interoperability >>>>> -- this _sounds_ like the

On 5/4/19 6:49 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 06:42:47PM +0200, Thomas K?nig wrote: >>> - figure out Fortran2003 specification for C/Fortran interoperability >>> -- this _sounds_ like the right solution, but I don't think many >>> understand how to use it and what is implied (in particular, will >>> it require making changes to LAPACK

Executive summary: I believe revision 86265 makes it more difficult to build R with OpenBLAS on Windows as now the entire LAPACK needs to be built to obtain zspmv. Is there anything that can be done to allow the former behavior to be used, something in Mkrules.local perhaps? Detailed Explanation: I have been building R with OpenBLAS for Windows 64 for over a decade by patching

Dear developeRs, I'm trying to build R (2.7.1, on an x86_64 running Linux, but I believe I have observed this on x86 and with earlier versions of R as well) using external BLAS and LAPACK libraries _and_ generating libR.so, libRblas.so and libRlapack.so. Without --enable-BLAS-shlib, configure is able to find and use the external LAPACK library: ./configure \

On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 11:55 AM Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 5/4/19 6:49 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 06:42:47PM +0200, Thomas K?nig wrote: > >>> - figure out Fortran2003 specification for C/Fortran interoperability > >>> -- this _sounds_ like the right solution, but I don't think many >

Hi, I am working on a UNIX machine and I am interfacing R and C with the .C function. I am trying to call LAPACK and BLAS routines, but am running into a problem where, while I am able to run the BLAS routines, I cannot run the LAPACK routines. I compile my .c file (at end of email) in the following way: [mhitczen at jlogin2 ~/Cstuff]$ R CMD SHLIB testmore.c gcc -std=gnu99

A couple of years ago I noted that using the configure switch --enable-R-shlib when buildig R made configure ignore any specified external LAPACK library (I cannot recall if also the BLAS specification was ignored) and use the internal one insted. I asked why, and was told it was intentional. Now, with R 2.15.1, I see that it at least appears that this is no longer the case. I've run

Dear Thomas, thank you for your input. I've debugged one of the packages and I confirm that the breakage is related to passing of strings from C to Fortran. Indeed, BLAS and LAPACK define a large number of subroutines that take one or more explicit single-character strings as arguments. Other than that, BLAS has only one function (xerbla), which takes a string of unspecified length,

A couple of years ago (in 2008, using R 2.7.x, I believe) I noted that using the configure switch --enable-R-shlib when buildig R made configure ignore any specified external LAPACK library and use the internal one insted. I asked why, and was told it was intentional. Now, with R 2.15.1, I see that it at least appears that this is no longer the case. I've run configure like this:

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Dear All, I am building R from source[1], following what is done in "rules" for building Debian's R. But the R I generate, in contrast to the standard Debian's R, will not change the BLAS and LAPACK libraries it uses when I change them via "update-alternatives". I have no idea what I am doing wrong (but, somehow, I've been quite capable of making the same

Hi, I'm relatively new to R on Ubuntu (moving from Windows), and I'm trying to get GotoBLAS2 working. I installed (from a CRAN mirror) the pre-built binaries of R (which, as far as I know, is compiled as a shared library) on Ubuntu 10.10 using apt-get install r-base r-base-dev I successfully built GotoBLAS2 from source, copied the library to /usr/lib and created s symbolic link from

OS X 10.2 and higher comes standard with highly optimized versions of BLAS and Lapack in /Systems/Library/Frameworks/vecLib.framework. It seems that even for double precision they do much better. See http://sthmac.magnet.fsu.edu/benchmarks/ I am not sure how these numbers would look on G3 Macs, but obviously for double precision there is not much reliance on Altivec. So I tried to configure

Hello, I just had a lot of trouble compiling a version of R which uses a recently-compiled version of ATLAS and LAPACK. ATLAS and LAPACK compiled correctly and installed fine and passed all of their checks (and yes, I did compile them all with -fPIC as is required for R). This was my initial configure line: ./configure --with-x --enable-threads=posix --with-blas="-L/usr/local/lib

I'd like to build R using my optimized blas and lapack libraries. It seems know matter what I do, the configure script uses the blas supplied with the source. My blas and lapack libraries are in /usr/local/atlas/lib. How can I get configure to use these? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello. I am a Linux neophyte and know almost nothing ?about compiling, so I would appreciate any help and advice y'all would care to offer. I am trying to compile the 64 bit version of R using a tuned ATLAS and LAPACK (ATLAS 3.9.24). I am running Ubunto 10.04 LTS (through wubi, FWIW). The ATLAS and LAPACK files (atlas.so, f77blas.so, lapack.so, and cblas.so) are sitting in the folder