similar to: CESA-2011:1241 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 ecryptfs-utils Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1241 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1241.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 0cb2b6619882f6492b3c0190eace5bb4 ecryptfs-utils-75-5.el5_7.2.i386.rpm 7a9e58b26bc1e9bb944ba131db28cad9 ecryptfs-utils-75-5.el5_7.2.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1503 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1503.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 7b3237947343a7dc3997db354dfbd762 ecryptfs-utils-75-8.el5.i386.rpm 381f3f7cedff81129f3a1e5d22130774 ecryptfs-utils-devel-75-8.el5.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1307 Low Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1307.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 880c55fb91b5da7be83571f90ed995c0 ecryptfs-utils-75-5.el5.i386.rpm 1dc8b59dfdfa7961103e3b91c780ea42 ecryptfs-utils-devel-75-5.el5.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1503 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1503.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 7b3237947343a7dc3997db354dfbd762 ecryptfs-utils-75-8.el5.i386.rpm c0b39223824b2154eaefe4d9b0409672 ecryptfs-utils-75-8.el5.x86_64.rpm

On 10/31/2015 08:24 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've found ecryptfs module into kernel-plus, but ecryptfs-utils is missing: > > [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# uname -r > 3.10.0-229.14.1.el7.centos.plus.x86_64 > [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# lsmod | grep ecryptfs > ecryptfs 85424 0 > > [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]#

Hi folks, I've found ecryptfs module into kernel-plus, but ecryptfs-utils is missing: [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# uname -r 3.10.0-229.14.1.el7.centos.plus.x86_64 [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# lsmod | grep ecryptfs ecryptfs 85424 0 [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# yum -q repolist id del repositorio nombre del repositorio

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1307 Low Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1307.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 685ff985b7e4c55879b31822f4b81bd2 ecryptfs-utils-75-5.el5.i386.rpm 652450acf1c7922023e7da04bc86a590 ecryptfs-utils-75-5.el5.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1377 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1377.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: e5a593818184aece2da4df854c0fa0b0 postgresql-8.1.23-1.el5_7.2.i386.rpm 6d7049b1c0c8ce788cd78463af220458 postgresql-contrib-8.1.23-1.el5_7.2.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1220 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1220.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 155e4c1fd8f4165e83e602cee07f3e68 samba3x-3.5.4-0.83.el5_7.2.i386.rpm cdaf234215185ad93ae0c773edb625e2 samba3x-client-3.5.4-0.83.el5_7.2.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1508 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1508.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: cd49a50d798896f2bc59e0dfb1c97df4 cyrus-imapd-2.3.7-12.el5_7.2.i386.rpm 1102eb2857fd8a71c1e4b51927aac33f cyrus-imapd-devel-2.3.7-12.el5_7.2.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1401 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1401.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: cecdd37b7b097d230d649eabbc3d26cf xen-3.0.3-132.el5_7.2.i386.rpm 1b035d24ae62134306e07641b2ff0585 xen-devel-3.0.3-132.el5_7.2.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1377 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1377.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: eeec946fd8c8b4088482e16e194a4aa4 postgresql-8.1.23-1.el5_7.2.x86_64.rpm 59b2c737e32f99236b5efa16ec6ce937

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1220 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1220.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: d1af26928e5b3437ed117f2ffbef2cb3 samba3x-3.5.4-0.83.el5_7.2.x86_64.rpm 0277d8f285c5006f57ae9f3a50ceb8fc samba3x-client-3.5.4-0.83.el5_7.2.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1401 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1401.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: ad399be12c8df4cef9923f1e2b080011 xen-3.0.3-132.el5_7.2.x86_64.rpm 1b035d24ae62134306e07641b2ff0585 xen-devel-3.0.3-132.el5_7.2.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1508 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1508.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 8a51558d164a0091ef2937d082269461 cyrus-imapd-2.3.7-12.el5_7.2.x86_64.rpm 1102eb2857fd8a71c1e4b51927aac33f cyrus-imapd-devel-2.3.7-12.el5_7.2.i386.rpm

I shared raid 5 array which is mounted using ecryptfs to a windows 10 client using samba share . When i do a robocopy of file greater than size of 7GB the samba throws an error NT Status: STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND which can be observed in wire shark . Setup : ---------- Host with ubuntu 16.01 -------------------> windows 10 client (Samba server,

I am now investigating encrypting our IMAP user spool files. Does anyone have experience with handling encrypted data stores using either or both of the subject methods and would care tio share their observations? Which is the preferred method (I know: it depends, but on what?)? What administrative pain does each cause? Our IMAP host is a KVM guest so spinning up a duplicate and simply

Hi , I shared linux directory which is mounted using ecryptfs to a windows 10 client using samba share . When i do a robocopy of file greater than size of 7GB the samba throws an error NT Status: STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND which can be observed in wire shark  . Setup : ---------- Host with ubuntu 16.01  -------------------> windows 10 client (Samba

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1107 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1107.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: cf9622b0c177d5fab0f77a37533a15d2 OpenIPMI-2.0.16-11.el5_7.2.i386.rpm 635fd933d714d245f7a9b0d4070c21df OpenIPMI-devel-2.0.16-11.el5_7.2.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1349 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1349.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 4d585e8b12ce27b13ffb5e0d45f9569b popt-1.10.2.3-22.el5_7.2.i386.rpm 82008752811345bd48c567d238545cde rpm-4.4.2.3-22.el5_7.2.i386.rpm