similar to: [PATCH] x86: IO-APIC code has no dependency on PCI

@@ -491,16 +512,15 @@ int pirq_guest_bind(struct vcpu *v, int int rc = 0; cpumask_t cpumask = CPU_MASK_NONE; + WARN_ON(!spin_is_locked(&v->domain->evtchn_lock)); I find this WARN_ON() is triggered harmlessly when I assign device to HVM guest. The call trace is XEN_DOMCTL_bind_pt_irq -> pt_irq_create_bind_vtd() -> pirq_guest_bind(). Should we

This patch enables PCI passthrough with stub domain. PCI passthrough with stub domain has failed in the past. The primary reason is that hypercalls from qemu in stub domain are rejected. This patch allows qemu in stub domain to call the hypercalls which is needed for PCI passthrough. For security, if target domain of hypercall is different from that of stub domain, it rejects hypercall. To use

With the .end() accessor having become optional and noting that several of the accessors'' behavior really depends on the result of msi_maskable_irq(), the splits the MSI IRQ chip type into two - one for the maskable ones, and the other for the (MSI only) non-maskable ones. At once the implementation of those methods gets moved from io_apic.c to msi.c. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich

Hello, More information and a patch for the bug. -- Pasi ----- Forwarded message from George Dunlap <George.Dunlap at eu.citrix.com> ----- From: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap at eu.citrix.com> To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich at novell.com> Cc: Sander Eikelenboom <linux at eikelenboom.it>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy at goop.org>, Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang at

flight 9061 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/9061/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking: test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 8995 Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-pv 5 xen-boot fail pass in 9054 test-i386-i386-pv

Under the assumption that in these cases recurring faults aren''t a security issue and it can be expected that the drivers there are going to try to take care of the problem. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_init.c +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_init.c @@ -625,6 +625,18 @@ static void parse_event_log_entry(struct

I am having reports of PCI passthrough problems with SR-IOV, in particular it looks like we are hitting the warning at msi:635 and msi:648 in xen; see the following log: (XEN) [VT-D]iommu.c:1785: VT-d page table not sharing with EPT table xenbus dev backend/vbd/1/5696 error 6 opening device (XEN) PCI add Virtual Function 04:1a.0 (XEN) HVM1: HVM Loader (XEN) HVM1: Detected Xen v4.1.0.rc2.pre (XEN)

XSA-36 changed the default vector map mode from global to per-device. This is because a global vector map does not prevent one PCI device from impersonating another and launching a DoS on the system. However, the per-device vector map logic is broken for devices with multiple MSI-X vectors, which can either result in a failed ASSERT() or misprogramming of a guests interrupt remapping tables.

The hypervisor side changes for XSA-46 require the tool stack to now always map the guest pIRQ before granting access permission to the underlying host IRQ (GSI). This in particular requires that pciif.py no longer can skip this step (assuming qemu would do it) for HVM guests. This in turn exposes, however, an inconsistency between xend and qemu: The former wants to always establish 1:1 mappings

MSI interrupt will not only used in PCI device, more and more Non-PCI device also want to use MSI. ARM GIC v3 spec says in ARM platform with GIC v3 controller, Non-PCI device can also be design to support MSI to simplify interrupt wires, for the existing Non-PCI device, consolidator is designed and used to translate legacy interrupt to MSI. So for support Non-PCI MSI device, generic MSI driver is

> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-pci-owner at vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-pci-owner at vger.kernel.org] > On Behalf Of Yijing Wang > Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 8:39 AM > To: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org > Cc: Xinwei Hu; Wuyun; Bjorn Helgaas; linux-pci at vger.kernel.org; > Paul.Mundt at huawei.com; James E.J. Bottomley; Marc Zyngier; linux-arm- > kernel at

> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-pci-owner at vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-pci-owner at vger.kernel.org] > On Behalf Of Yijing Wang > Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 8:39 AM > To: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org > Cc: Xinwei Hu; Wuyun; Bjorn Helgaas; linux-pci at vger.kernel.org; > Paul.Mundt at huawei.com; James E.J. Bottomley; Marc Zyngier; linux-arm- > kernel at

Use struct msi_ops to hook PCI MSI operations, and use struct msi_irqs to refactor PCI MSI drvier. Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing at huawei.com> --- drivers/pci/msi.c | 351 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- include/linux/msi.h | 14 +- include/linux/pci.h | 11 +- 3 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 154 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c

> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-pci-owner at vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-pci-owner at vger.kernel.org] > On Behalf Of Yijing Wang > Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 8:39 AM > To: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org > Cc: Xinwei Hu; Wuyun; Bjorn Helgaas; linux-pci at vger.kernel.org; > Paul.Mundt at huawei.com; James E.J. Bottomley; Marc Zyngier; linux-arm- > kernel at

> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-pci-owner at vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-pci-owner at vger.kernel.org] > On Behalf Of Yijing Wang > Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 8:39 AM > To: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org > Cc: Xinwei Hu; Wuyun; Bjorn Helgaas; linux-pci at vger.kernel.org; > Paul.Mundt at huawei.com; James E.J. Bottomley; Marc Zyngier; linux-arm- > kernel at

On Saturday 26 July 2014 11:08:37 Yijing Wang wrote: > The series is a draft of generic MSI driver that supports PCI > and Non-PCI device which have MSI capability. If you're not interested > it, sorry for the noise. I've finally managed to take some time to look at the series. Overall, the concept looks good to me, and the patches look very well implemented. The part

Signed-off-by: Chen Baozi <baozich@gmail.com> --- extras/mini-os/include/spinlock.h | 2 +- extras/mini-os/include/x86/arch_spinlock.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/extras/mini-os/include/spinlock.h b/extras/mini-os/include/spinlock.h index 70cf20f..6604e3c 100644 --- a/extras/mini-os/include/spinlock.h +++

On !SMP systems spinlocks do not exist. Thus checking of they are active will always fail. Use assert_spin_locked(lock); instead of BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(lock)); to not BUG() on all UP systems. Signed-off-by: Bruno Prémont <bonbons at linux-vserver.org> --- See also fdo bug #87552 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/event.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/notify.c | 2 +-

On 2014/7/30 14:47, Jiang Liu wrote: > > > On 2014/7/30 10:45, Yijing Wang wrote: >> On 2014/7/29 22:08, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> On Saturday 26 July 2014 11:08:37 Yijing Wang wrote: >>>> The series is a draft of generic MSI driver that supports PCI >>>> and Non-PCI device which have MSI capability. If you're not interested

Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing at huawei.com> --- arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h | 2 +- arch/x86/include/asm/irq_remapping.h | 4 +- arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h | 6 ++-- arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h | 10 +++--- arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 23 +++++++-------- arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c | 12 ++++----