Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "mail_max_userip_connections=10"
2012 Aug 31
1
New log entries with 2.0.19?
I just upgraded my Ubuntu server from 11.10 to 12.04.1 and that upgraded
Dovecot to 2.0.19. For some reason I'm getting a lot more (5 times)
disconnect in IDLE and inactivity time outs. I'm using only IMAP with
two users. Both users access the server from multiple devices, phone,
tablet and desktop computer. I had previously set the
max_userip_connections to 20 and rarely got the
2016 Oct 28
4
iPhone/iPad IMAP connection bursts causes user+IP exceeded
I frequently see this from my iPhone/iPad IMAP users:
Oct 24 21:30:55 server dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<user>, ...
[... repeated 10 times ...]
Oct 24 21:32:54 server dovecot: imap-login: Maximum number of connections from user+IP exceeded (mail_max_userip_connections=12): user=<user>
Oct 24 21:32:54 server dovecot: imap(user): Logged out ...
[... repeated 11 times
2019 May 29
1
mail_max_userip_connections
mail_max_userip_connections
Can I set up an ip whitelist list, and the ip in this whitelist is unrestricted? thanks!!!
hfh at cndns.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20190529/6641d3de/attachment.html>
2010 Sep 27
1
Meaning of mail_max_userip_connections?
Hi,
I set mail_max_userip_connections in our IMAP configuration to
mail_max_userip_connections = 10
to allow users 10 parallel connections. It seems that this also limits
the amount of parallel connections from one IP but different users?!
Our users mostly accessing the IMAP server by a webmailer or proxies.
Thus, all users (>10000) come from only 5 different IP. However, I got a
lot of
2017 Nov 29
0
iPhone/iPad IMAP connection bursts causes user+IP exceeded
Thanks for the reply and suggestion Robert.
I have now set mail_max_userip_connections to 400 in 20-imap.conf to see
if it makes any difference.
Late yesterday the customer tested from his office, an older IOS 9
tablet and he had IMAP working in a matter of minutes, so is certainly
an newer software version by Apple issue.
On 30/11/17 03:03, Robert Giles wrote:
> David,
>
> I'd
2009 Dec 10
1
mail_max_userip_connections
What is the appropriate setting for mail_max_userip_connections ?
My POP3 connections seem to be mostly 1 at a time, but my IMAP
connections are often 3 per user per IP. Is this appropriate?
If I change the IMAP setting to mail_max_userip_connections=1
will it break things for the user?
I am trying to improve this situation:
> ps auxwww | grep "imap " | wc
237 3080 22400
2013 Mar 04
1
dovecot: imap-login: Maximum number of connections from user+IP exceeded (mail_max_userip_connections)
Hi, has anyone seen this issue before as I have not.
I'm a long time dovecot user and I don't see anything in the config that
should cause this.
The mail.log gets hit a lot of times with this same log message:
dovecot: imap-login: Maximum number of connections from user+IP exceeded
(mail_max_userip_connections)
I have noted that it is more evident when I try to mass delete many
2018 Mar 30
1
mail_max_userip_connections from userdb query
Hello.
Is still true that mail_max_userip_connections cannot be overriden in userdb
query? Want lower global and raise for some logins.
https://www.dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2017-July/108520.html
--
Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org )
2012 Jan 20
2
mail_max_userip_connections exceeded.
Hi
I'm using Dovecot version 1:1.2.15-7 installed on Debian Squeeze via apt-get..
I have this error in the logs.
/var/log/mail.log.1:2490:Jan 19 12:02:55 mail dovecot: imap-login:
Maximum number of connections from user+IP exceeded
(mail_max_userip_connections): user=<user at example.com>, method=PLAIN,
rip=127.0.0.1, secured
I never changed this from the default 10. When I googled
2011 May 08
2
exceeded mail_max_userip_connections
Dumb Q
I just got this in my Snapper client log
I can't acces server log at this point
dovecot 1.x
I can access another account OK
what it means, what I need do?
(is this as I have K-9 client access same mail?)
----------
START MANUAL: 8/5/11 10:55 am
RECEIVE:
ACCOUNT: voytek
SSL: Connection secure.
IMAP Server: Maximum number of connections from user+IP exceeded
2009 Apr 03
1
Missing mail_max_userip_connections setting
Hi,
I'm having a problem with a webmail client trying to open multiple IMAP
connections with dovecot, and hitting a cap. I see from the error logs
from this program that it's hitting the mail_max_userip_connections cap,
but I'm not seeing this value as defined in the dovecot.conf file. Would
this automatically get set to a certain value by default if it's not
present?
Thanks,
2016 Jan 14
2
Increasing mail_max_userip_connections and sys resources
In our low-traffic server we have always kept the default value for IMAP
mail_max_userip_connections (10).
The server has been working fine! (Thank you Timo for this!)
However, recently we have been having:
Maximum number of connections from user+IP exceeded
errors both for IMAP and webmail users.
Thus, we have now changed the value to 100.
The questions:
1.Might this lead to
2020 Feb 27
3
max number of connections per ip
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
Is your server behind proxy maybe? Can you see in logs that you get different IPs?
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Maybe check with `doveadm who` how many connections you have?
</div>
<div>
2007 Jun 30
3
v1.1 max connections per user
v1.1 has now:
# Maximum number of connections allowed for a user. The limits are enforced
# separately for IMAP and POP3 connections, so you can move this setting
# inside protocol {} to have separate settings for them. NOTE: The user names
# are compared case-sensitively, so make sure your userdb returns usernames
# always using the same casing so users can't bypass this limit!
2020 Feb 27
2
max number of connections per ip
I have been haunted by the following error message or months, that we
see using Thunderbird.
Unable to connect to your IMAP server.
You may have exceeded the maximum number of connections to this server.
If so, use the Advanced IMAP Server Settings dialogue to reduce the
number of cached connections.
If I change my location, via a VPN, the error message goes away and I
can connect.
I have
2020 Feb 28
3
[EXT] Re: max number of connections per ip
You can usually see from doveadm who or logs if your router/whatever is doing NAT.
Which would be the reason why 500 connections wouldn't be enough.
Aki
> On 27/02/2020 23:21 Esteban L <esteban at little-beak.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> It's not behind a proxy (unless the router is acting as a proxy?). Could it be that my router is doing some Hairpin NAT tomfoolery? The
2017 Nov 29
0
iPhone/iPad IMAP connection bursts causes user+IP exceeded
On 30/11/17 03:03, Robert Giles wrote:
>> David,
>>
>> I'd say that if you set the mail_max_userip_connections value to a
>> large-ish number (300-400), your users likely won't notice an issue on
>> their iOS 10.x and iOS 11.x devices.? It's more of an annoyance in the
>> logs, and occasionally the iOS Mail app will show that it is stuck
>>
2011 Aug 24
3
Dovecot rejecting Vpopmail User 89
I'm working to get Dovecot 2.0.13 working along with qmail, Vpopmail and
Squirrelmail on a Debian 6.0.2 system, Dovecot compiled, not from a
package.
Vpopmail has a widely known assigned user/group ID of 89 and is the owner
of all the mail folders.
Regardless of value of first_valid_uid (1, 89, other), Dovecot denies
Squirrelmail connection, saying it can't allow access to UID 89.
2007 Jul 24
2
need to limit imap/pop processes per user.. possible?
Is it possible to limit the imap/pop connections per user in dovecot? If
so i couldnt find the option to do that.
Thanks!
--
Jordan Tardif
DreamHost
2018 Jan 08
0
Linker Option support for ELF
> I think we all agree that blindly allowing the linker to honor the options
> would be scary. I agree that we should whitelist the options, and am of the
> opinion that we should force validation on the linker side (use of any
> option which the linker doesn't support in this form can be fatal).
> Starting small is the best way, with `-l` and `-L` as a starting point. I
>