Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "help with mediate() and medsens()"
2012 Jul 31
1
Mediation analysis
Hello all,
I apologize for the simplistic question, but I have been having some trouble
learning how to do mediation analysis in R. Ideally, I would like to use
Preacher's Bootstrapping test for mediation (Preacher & Hayes, 2004). I have
attempted to use the mediate package to set this up, using code that looks
basically like this:
model.m <- lm(data$outcome ~ data$mediator +
2011 May 12
1
problem with mediation
Hello!
I have problem with mediation analysis. I can do it with function
mediate, when I have one mediator. But how I can do it if I have one
independent variable and one dependent variable but 4 mediators? I
have try function mediations, but it dosen't work. If I use mediate 4
times, each for every mediator, is it same? I want to know what is
total mediate effect for 4 mediators.
t.Mete
2013 Nov 04
0
Fwd: mediation analysis with R
? stato filtrato un testo allegato il cui set di caratteri non era
indicato...
Nome: non disponibile
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20131104/739bd002/attachment.pl>
2009 Feb 13
0
problem with mediation
Dear friends,
i've a little problem with a study about mediation. I will call my dependent variable "Y", the independent "X" and "Z" will be my mediator variable...
Using a linear regression, i can say that there isn't a direct effect of X on Y because the coefficient of X isn't significative, but i've tried to use anyway the Sobel's test to
2013 Mar 21
1
Control variables in mediation analysis
Hi everyone,I would like to test a mediation model, that has several control variables. More specifically, I would like to test the indirect effect with bootstrapping. However, all the packages I have found so far (e.g. MBESS) only allow testing a simple mediation model (One independent, one mediator, one dependent) so that I cannot include any controls.
Can somebody help me?
[[alternative HTML
2010 Jul 08
0
bootstrapping: multilevel and multiple mediation
Hello,
Have someone performed a bootstrap in a multiple-mediator model? I am trying to compute a bootstrap in a multiple and multilevel mediation. Up top now, I have developed bootstraps in random coeffient models, but I am very lost concerning the mediation. Could someone to provide me some ideas about syntax in R?
Thank you very much in advance,
Bea
2011 Sep 20
0
The boot Package with bca Intervals and Inf and NaN Values in an Automated Function [mediation()]
Hi everyone,
I use the boot package within the MBESS package to automate much of
the hard part for folks interested in performing a (simple) mediation
model. The function mediation() works well, except for a (probably)
unrealistic artificial data set.
When I apply the bootstrap I sometimes get:
Error in t.star[r, ] <- res[[r]]
which is (I think) due to Inf and -Inf and NaN values produced for
2010 Feb 05
0
Censored outcomes - repeated measures and mediators
Hello,
In a study exploring transgenerational transmission of anxiety
disorder we investigate whether infants react to experimentally
induced mood changes of their mothers. We measured the time that an
infant needed to cross a cliff (=crossing time) depending on whether
his mother had previously undergone a mood induction (treatment) or
not (control). The treatment is thus a
2012 Mar 28
0
package update: mediation
Package update: mediation
Scholars across a range of disciplines are increasingly interested in
identifying causal mechanisms, going beyond the estimation of causal
effects. The mediation package (4.0) estimates mediation effects for a
variety of experimental designs and statistical models. The update covers
new models, designs, and includes many new functionalities.
Dustin Tingley
Government
2004 May 31
0
Fwd: [Serusers] CDR mediation for VoIP
FYI, for those of you who aren't on the serusers list.
I'd like to hear how others can get this working in small Asterisk
settings; I don't really have the time to implement it, but it looks
very interesting.
JT
>To: serusers@iptel.org
>From: Adrian Georgescu <ag@ag-projects.com>
>Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 23:05:47 +0200
>Subject: [Serusers] CDR mediation for VoIP
2009 Apr 02
1
problem with svyglm()
Hello,
I'm trying to use the function svyglm in the library survey.
I create a data survey object:
data_svy<- svydesign(id=~PSU, strata=~sample_domain,
weights=~sample_weight, data=data, nest=TRUE)
and I try to use svyglm() with little success:
R<-svyglm(data_svy[,4]~(data_svy[,iCol]==listModality[[iVar]]
[iMod]),design=data_svy, family=binomial(link="logit")
Error in
2007 Jul 06
0
svyglm
Dear Professor Lumley
I am relatively new to using R and also to logistic regression. We have
analysed our Dudley Health Survey using the survey package. I am now
trying to look at associations using svyglm but I am unsure of how to
interpret the output and present the resulting model or whether there
are any other things I should do to check the validity of the model.
Below is an example of
2012 Dec 10
3
Warning message: In eval(expr, envir, enclos) : non-integer #successes in a binomial glm!
Hi there
I'm trying to fit a logistic regression model to data that looks very similar to the data in the sample below. I don't understand why I'm getting this error; none of the data are proportional and the weights are numeric values. Should I be concerned about the warning about non-integer successes in my binomial glm? If I should be, how do I go about addressing it?
I'm
2009 Oct 09
1
svy / weighted regression
Dear list,
I am trying to set up a propensity-weighted regression using the
survey package. Most of my population is sampled with a sampling
probability of one (that is, I have the full population). However, for
a subset of the data I have only a 50% sample of the full population.
In previous work on the data, I analyzed these data using SAS and
STATA. In those packages I used a propensity weight
2012 Jun 06
3
Sobel's test for mediation and lme4/nlme
Hello,
Any advice or pointers for implementing Sobel's test for mediation in
2-level model setting? For fitting the hierarchical models, I am using
"lme4" but could also revert to "nlme" since it is a relatively simple
varying intercept model and they yield identical estimates. I apologize for
this is an R question with an embedded statistical question.
I noticed that a
2006 Jul 18
1
Survey-weighted ordered logistic regression
Hi,
I am trying to fit a model with an ordered response variable (3 levels) and
13 predictor variables. The sample has complex survey design and I've used
'svydesign' command from the survey package to specify the sampling design.
After reading the manual of 'svyglm' command, I've found that you can fit a
logistic regression (binary response variable) by specifying the
2012 Aug 15
2
sensitivity and specificity in svyglm??
Hello,
As obtained from a table svyglm clasificaion, sensitivity and specificity. The funtion ConfusionMatrix () of the library (caret)
gives these results but not how to apply it to svyglm.
thanks
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2010 Apr 28
2
Generating a model fitness when score using svyglm?
Does anyone know how to calculated a BIC score (or an equivalent model
fitness score) when using svyglm for logistic regressions?
Thanks
Brad
--
View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Generating-a-model-fitness-when-score-using-svyglm-tp2069280p2069280.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
2008 Aug 06
1
Warning when using survey:::svyglm
Howdy,
Referencing the below exchange:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2006-April/103862.html
I am still getting the same warning ("non-integer #successes in a
binomial glm!") when using svyglm:::survey. Using the API data:
library(survey)
data(api)
#stratified sample
dstrat<-svydesign(id=~1,strata=~stype, weights=~pw, data=apistrat, fpc=~fpc)
2010 May 11
1
(svy)glm and weights question
Hi all,
I am running a set of logistic regressions, where we want to use some
weights, and I am not sure whether what I am doing is reasonable or
not.
The dependent variable is turnout in an election - i.e. survey
respondents were asked whether or not they voted. The percentage of
those who say they voted is much higher than the actual turnout,
probably due both to non-response bias and social