similar to: Cannot delete subfolder in public folder

Hi. Well, I've the next problem. I turned on the new attachment de-duplication stuff in the configuration. If I send an attchment between two accounts on my test system, the attment gets saved ion the configured mail_attachment_dir. But... if I delete it from the senders Send folder and the receivers Inbox (and of course empty Trash afterwards in both cases), the hashes and the attachment

g'day! I'd just like to share my experience with public namespace and ACLs. I know this has been discussed a number of times in the past, but there were no definite answers. dovecot version i'm using: 1.0.13 Got a public namespace setup in dovecot.conf as follows: namespace public { separator = . prefix = Public_Folders. location = maildir:/home/vmail/domains/%

Background: I am wanting to create shared folders (public namespace) with access control lists on the sub directories. Our implementation of dovecot (v1.0b7) uses many virtual users and domains and 1 actual user (vmail), all using maildir. So far I have successfully created the public namespace (Public_Folders) which every user can access but I'm having difficulty restricting access using

Hello! I'm testing the virtual mail boxes using telnet. The telnet seesion completes 100% okay with no errors at all. Though, when postfix has to relay the message to dovecot, i get the following error in my delivery log (/home/vmail/dovecot-delivery): deliver(john): 2009-03-21 16:23:00 Panic: i_stream_stat() used for non-blocking seekable stream deliver(john): 2009-03-21 16:23:00 Error: Raw

Dear Help, We are in the process of setting up a new domain using Active Directory on Windows Server 2003R2. One of our goals was to use Active Directory for authentication on our AIX box (running version 6.1). I was able to successfully set up Kerberos, and the LDAP client to connect to our AD server so that you can now log in to the AIX box with users found in Active Directory. However, no

Louis, could you take a look on my case again? I am not sure that the problem is in incorrect groups. Only trusted credentials don't work. Have you any idea what the reason is? On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 19:50, Yakov Revyakin <yrevyakin at gmail.com> wrote: > Some more details. Below is what I have during joining Linux (Ubuntu > 20.04) to the SVITLA3 domain. SVITLA3 (Samba) is

This seems to be happening only when using the pop3c plugin. Any advice? root at imap01:/etc/dovecot# doveadm -D -o imapc_user=chat_logs at xxxxxx.com -o 'imapc_password=*******' -o pop3c_user=chat_logs at xxxxxx.com -o 'pop3c_password=*****' backup -u chat_logs at xxxxxx.com -R imapc: doveadm(root): Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/lib/dovecot/modules doveadm(root):

Hi, I'm stuck with a problem we have with dovecot. My suspicion is, that it has to do with accessing the same mailbox/mail stored on a NFS-share from two machines at the same time. setup We have to mail servers running, both run a Ubuntu 10.04, Postfix 2.70 and Dovecot 1.2.9. The mailboxes are stored in maildir format on a NFS-Share. In front of those to mail servers we have a load

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.8.3+comet2+shim4.10.0+comet3-1+deb9u5 Severity: important Tags: patch security -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.4 APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-6-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),

Hi, I want to use Xen on a current Testing using the amd64 architecture. I want to use the i386 architecture for the laster Xen guests. The hardware is a Intel Xeon 5130 (Woodcrest) with the Vanderpool support. Two harddisk are used as a Linux software raid 1. Installing the hypervisor and rebooting worked like a charm since the bootmenu of grub has also been updates:) The hypervisor is

On 19:47:03 wrote Rowland penny: > > I have just started an old vm with samba 3.6.6 as pdc and openlap > > as backend. smbpasswd -a someuser does not work, if someuser does > > not exist. > > Are you using smbldap-tools or ldapsam:editposix ? In this vm ldapsam:editposix. OK. I have just created a posix-only user in openldap. And then tried smbpasswd -a test01.

Hi, Is it possible to have a static user database along with an LDAP password database and *not* be forced to set "allow_all_users=yes" for the userdb? The wiki page on static user database says "Normally static userdb handles this by doing a passdb lookup instead." How should the passdb behave in order for this to work? In my tests (on a test server) I am using

Hai, I dont use trusts myself, this is what i see. Lets take small steps here. First of all, why does the DOMAIN contains/shows a dot in it. ( i think its a wrong setting in sssd, but i dont know sssd ) I know this is one of your REALMs and not the domain. I refer to : https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/909264/naming-conventions-in-active-directory-for-computers-domains-sites-and

Hi, I'm wondering, whether it's possible, to define an ACL on the mailbox itself. We use Dovecot 1.2.15 (included in Debian 6) and maildir filesystem layout: /home/mail01/user1/Maildir/new \ /home/mail01/user1/Maildir/cur Inbox /home/mail01/user1/Maildir/tmp / /home/mail01/user1/Maildir/.folder1/new \ /home/mail01/user1/Maildir/.folder1/cur folder1

Some more details. Below is what I have during joining Linux (Ubuntu 20.04) to the SVITLA3 domain. SVITLA3 (Samba) is trusting, APEX (AD) is trusted. SVITLA3 has *administrator *and *test01 *users, APEX has *administrator *and *jake *users. test01 - 20000:20000 (uidNumber:gidNumber) jake - 10000:10000 You can see some delay in some places - I marked them bold. It looks like DNS timeouts. The

Hi. I have some issues after rebooting the system. First, I would like to show you how I have installed XEN. S.O: Debian Lenny Installation: By default without additional packets So, I installed XEN # aptitude install xen-hypervisor-i386 libc6-xen xen-utils xen-tools bridge-utils # aptitude install xen-linux-system-2.6.26-2-xen-686 # nano /etc/modules loop max_loop=128 # nano

Hello, we are searching for a possibility to configure a user login on behalf of another user with a PAM backend. This reminds to the behavior of a master user. But a master user can access the mailboxes of all users. We need this more restricted. Example: User "user1" and "user2" shall get access to the mailbox "info". We define the accounts

Hi All, when i did testing with group mapping, i mapped a Unix Group(domadm) with Windows Domain Group(domain users). then i access a samba share from Windows Domain User(administrator), and create a file. but the file's group is still Windows Domain Group(domain user), not Unix Group(domadm). is it right? if it is, how should i check if my group mapping is working well? thanks a lot in

hi, i would like to allow access to specific samba shares, where the windows domain user is NOT authenticated against the share with it's username, but with a membership of a given windows-group. example: windows-domain user "test01" --> which is a member of windows domain group "smb_test01" --> which gets mapped to the unix-group "smb01" --> which is

Hi, I wonder if anyone can help me with this, I have been trying to get a vm up and running for a while now and cant for the life of me work out why it isnt working. The errors I get arnt very helpful and im at a loss as how to debug this any further. Here is the command and output that I get...(Also nothing shows up with virsh list --all after so its starting to install then dropping out) Hope