similar to: sieve, vacation - lda-dupes being ignored?

Hi i have similiar problem like here: http://www.iredmail.org/forum/topic11833-iredmail-support-vocation-respone-unknown-user.html email send : from : web123 at gmail.com to : jacka at mail.com vocation sent back from : jacka at mail.com to : srs0=hmc8=v7=gmail.com=web123 at mail.com postsrsd changing return-path from web123 at gmail.com to srs0=hmc8=v7= gmail.com=web123 at mail.com this

I have this version with FIXME /* FIXME: If From header of message has same address, we should use that * instead to properly include the phrase part. */ rfc2822_header_printf(msg, "To", "<%s>", reply_to); This should be work ok? Or You must change something? 2017-07-20 15:51 GMT+02:00 Stephan Bosch <stephan at

Hello, we face an issue with the vacation extension of pigeonhole. Our upstream mail server (from which we pull our E-Mails with POP3) uses SPF and performs a SRS re-write of the Return Path. Once the mail is processed via our local postfix, it is delivered via dovecot deliver (using the lda). When the recipient has a vacation rule enabled in sieve, the out-of-office note cannot be sent, as

Op 20-7-2017 om 10:37 schreef Kacper Guzik: > Hi i have similiar problem like here: > > http://www.iredmail.org/forum/topic11833-iredmail-support-vocation-respone-unknown-user.html > > > email send : > from : web123 at gmail.com > to : jacka at mail.com > > vocation sent back > from : jacka at mail.com > to : srs0=hmc8=v7=gmail.com=web123 at mail.com > >

Op 7/20/2017 om 8:24 PM schreef Kacper Guzik: > I have this version with FIXME > > > /* FIXME: If From header of message has same address, we should use > that > > * instead to properly include the phrase part. > > */ > > rfc2822_header_printf(msg, "To", "<%s>", reply_to); > > > > This should

Op 27/02/2019 om 13:30 schreef Matthias Petermann via dovecot: > Hello, > > we face an issue with the vacation extension of pigeonhole. Our > upstream mail server (from which we pull our E-Mails with POP3) uses > SPF and performs a SRS re-write of the Return Path. Once the mail is > processed via our local postfix, it is delivered via dovecot deliver > (using the lda).

Hi i have similiar problem like here: http://www.iredmail.org/forum/topic11833-iredmail-support-vocation-respone-unknown-user.html email send : from : web123 at gmail.com to : jacka at mail.com vocation sent back from : jacka at mail.com to : srs0=hmc8=v7=gmail.com=web123 at mail.com postsrsd changing return-path from web123 at gmail.com to srs0=hmc8=v7= gmail.com=web123 at mail.com this is

Op 8/24/2017 om 7:05 PM schreef Kacper Guzik: > i Cant compile piegeon hole from github with this feature: > That's because this branch is based on master (v2.3). I created a rebased branch for v2.2: https://github.com/dovecot/pigeonhole/tree/vacation-to-header-ignore-envelope-2.2 Regards, Stephan. > 2822.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/rfc2822.o > > *edit-mail.c:* In function

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 14 May 2014, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 5/13/2014 3:02 PM, Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl> wrote: >> If you know what you are doing (think twice about that!), you can override >> this behavior using the sieve_vacation_send_from_recipient setting (if your >> Pigeonhole is recent enough): >>

i Cant compile piegeon hole from github with this feature: 2822.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/rfc2822.o *edit-mail.c:* In function '*edit_mail_set_cache_corrupted*': *edit-mail.c:1665:3:* *error: *too many arguments to function ' *edmail->wrapped->v.set_cache_corrupted*' (&edmail->wrapped->mail, field, reason); * ^* *edit-mail.c:* At top level:

Thanks for answers. I think its now flaw.. but design.. Tinc auto-mesh is very very handy. You just need to avoid flat networks. There is also IndirectMode w/ forces nodes to be switched by intermediate node... but I would be cautionus how its used. I use it myself for certain nodes behind NATs where they cannot be connected to, so always connect node handles switching for them. You noticed it

On Tue, 5 May 2020 13:32:50 +0100 Jonathan Plews <SRS0=286U=6T=yahoo.co.uk=pl3w5y at mijnuvt.nl> wrote: > I didn't study the internals but maybe changing DirectOnly, Forwarding > and IndirectData will have an impact on per packet performance and > speed stability by disabling some of the meshing features? I will definitely try those. > Although it probably just hit the CPU

Hi. I have few questions out of curiosity.. Cant help for now with your problem... What version is crashing? 1.1 or 1.0 ? How your network is segmented..? I use tinc myself here a lot too (1.0) but my network is very segmented. I use switch mode and handle routing myself, so mesh links arent large.. I would NOT go beyond 30 nodes for full auto-mesh.. its already like 435 edges... Regards,

Hi, thank for getting back. I'll answer the questions, but I've already gave up on tinc and switch to zerotier-one. On 2020-07-27 5:10 p.m., borg at uu3.net wrote: > Hi. I have few questions out of curiosity.. Cant help for now with > your problem... > > What version is crashing? 1.1 or 1.0 ? 1.1 is crashing > > How your network is segmented..? > I use tinc myself

Hello, i get this message every time that a user has enabled the vacation script (into Horde webmail) in my mail.err log file: Dec 22 10:18:16 mailserver dovecot: deliver(user324): file_dotlock_create(~/.dovecot.lda-dupes) failed: No such file or directory normally the reply is sent only once in the number of configured days.. but for all users the reply is sent every time... the day

Hello, A quick question. How long are the Message-ID and recipient of forwarded messages (thru the redirect action) kept in .dovecot.lda-dupes? According to the code, it could be 24 hours; am I right? TIA, Axel

What is the purpose and/or use of the dovecot.lda-dupes file that (sometimes) exists in the home folder for each user? I've seen some posts about issues with the file or losing track of the location, etc, but nothing on what the file actually does or how it could be useful. I assume it is just a dovecot file that helps not keep track of ? I guess duplicate mails? It looks like it contains

Hello, I have dovecot 2.2.6 and pignenhole 0.4.2 running on freebsd9.1. We have a mix of unix users (/home/user) and postfixadmin users (/home/vmail/domain/user). I am using dovecot managesive with afterlogic webmail which has a managesieve plugin to set the out of office message. All works fine. I have sieve_vacation_default_period set to 1d. The problem I&#39;m trying to solve is that users

Hi everyone, some days ago I had trouble with my NFS-Server (high delays) which caused dovecot lmtp to deliver the same message several times (up to 10x). I recognized some old/unused .nfsXXXX files in the maildirs which seemed to be index files. I deleted them and everything was fine again. However, there are still 2-3 mailboxen where mails (old and new ones) are delivered multiple times. All

Hello.... I'm using the vacation feature, but the vacation reply is sent when ever a mail is received. What I want is, that the reply should only be sent one time to each user. My understanding is, that a list of people who have received the vacation message should be stored in the file .dovecot.lda-dupes in the users folder. This file is not present in my users fould. I have tried