similar to: Parallel auth

Hi, Is it noted somewhere that Dovecot (v 2.0.9) doesn?t use case in directory names in its config-files? I found that out the hard way (i.e. a week of debugging)!! in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-master.conf, the line: unix_listener /var/spool/postOut/auth/dovecot-auth { creates a: Jul 29 22:15:58 server dovecot: master: Error: service(auth): unlink(/var/run/dovecot/) failed: Is a directory but

Hi Folks, I'm trying out some ideas for loadbalancing Samba servers with some replication underneath. Right now, we're trying to use DNS round robin, just to see if it works, but it isn't. Our basic config is that we have the same share and NMB server name on every node. Each node has a different IP hostname, which are all round-robin'ed to a single hostname. When we try to

Hi all, Can someone help me in creating a single bandwidth pipe out of two or more bandwidth providers. Say, I have 2 internet connections 1) 128 K 2) 128 K I want to use both of them on a single linux box. Is there any way to do so. Of course loadbalancing can be done, but I don''t want loadbalancing. I want to have a single pipe of 256 K. Some time back I was suggested to use squid on

Hey all, I upgraded some servers today from Debian Lenny to Debian Squeeze, and after the upgrade I started getting dovecot crashes. I was on 2.0.13 but got these there as well, and hoped upgrading to 2.0.16 would help. It didn't. Anyone have an idea? Cor Dec 18 23:32:21 userimap1 kernel: [263492.245530] __ratelimit: 122 callbacks suppressed Dec 18 23:32:21 userimap1 kernel:

Hi Mike, Thanks for your fast and informative responce. >> I'm looking to stream a large amount of conncurrent connects and want to >> use icecast probably on a CentOS base. The bandwidth requirements are over >> 60 Mbps before any overheads, I'm looking at using some Dell SC1425 machines >> but am not sure how many I'd need, I'd appreciated hearing your

I have 2 ADSL ad1 and ad2 , one PC for my firewall and some deamon on it with 3 ethernet : eth0 connect to my LAN ( 192.168.60.0/24 ) and 2 other connect to ad1 and ad2 |eth1 (10.0.1.2)--------------------ad1 ( ADSL 1 ) | My LAN(192.168.60.0/24) |---------eth0( 192.168.60.2)--> PC | |eth2 (10.0.2.2)---------------------ad2 (ADSL 2 ) All computer in LAN has default router =

Hi there Does anyone know if it is possible to install a largescale asterisk cluster with up to 1000 external lines. Redundancy and loadbalancing would surely be a must for a such system, but which other things should be considered? Best Regards Guenther Rust

Hi all, In order to do loadbalancing between my two *, i wanted to stock all things concerning voicemail on a NFS partition... I see that the voicemail system put his files onto two differents directories : /var/spool/asterisk/voicemail/mycontext etc. and /var/lib/asterisk/voicemail/mycontext etc. I've two questions : Why ? and how can i do to centralize the destination of the messages AND

Hi, I am new to clustering and loadbalancing in apache, What is best way of doing it? How do I do the clustering and what tools do I need to use? Do I have those tools, I use CentOS , Do i have any tools in CenOs which comes default in it? And how do I do apache load balancing? should I rely on apache forums or mailing list or is there any way or tool I can use in CentOS? Can any throw some vague

On Sat, 4 Nov 2017 01:57:31 +0200 Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > >> > >> While it might be possible to disable all the other services except > >> master I must ask why? How would the users be accessing their mails then? > >> > >> Sami > > > > Hello Sami, > > > > you did not read my first post. We

Hello, two days ago I've upgraded to 1.2rc2 and the new sieve implementation (version 0.1.4). Today I got the first mail that got stuck in the postfix queue because deliver was dying with a segfault. The mail is spam, thus I don't have any issues sharing it: http://users.birkenwald.de/~berni/temp/deliver-segfault.mail It happens with this small sieve script (my normal one is larger, but

Gerald Galster via dovecot schrieb: > mail1.yourdomain.com <http://mail1.yourdomain.com> IN A 192.168.10.1 > mail2.yourdomain.com <http://mail2.yourdomain.com>?IN A 192.168.20.1 > > mail.yourdomain.com <http://mail.yourdomain.com> ?IN A 192.168.10.1 > mail.yourdomain.com <http://mail.yourdomain.com> ?IN A 192.168.20.1 > > > mail1/mail2 is for

Hi! I got some strange problem with routing loadbalancing. I cannot get the full speed from my ISPs until I get some big files from close ftp server. I have server with one connection to internal network and 3 to ISPs: __________ | eth1|---- ISP1 | | internal--|eth0 eth2|---- ISP2 net | | (~300 | eth3|---- ISP3 hosts

Hi, I've been working on a replacement for nsd-xfer/bind-xfer for the use with NSD for some evenings now, and since I believe that at least some of you do have the same problem I experienced during my transition to NSD (that is, bind-xfer is only available in BIND8, which is sometimes a little bit peeky in being compiled, plus the many invokations of that program during the regular

Hello, The company that I work for will be developing a large webbased survey (for a government institution) somewhere in Q1/Q2 of 2006. I''m investigating the technological possibilities and Rails is certainly a candidate. The survey application will have to perform under very high peak load, and the exact specifications of the hardware are not known at this point. I''m assuming

Should it be possible to run multiple dovecot servers on the same mailboxes (Maildir in my case)? I've a setup where 2 dovecot 0.99.13 servers write to the same mailboxes, which dovecot apparently does not like too much. Example (using imap): - Login with mail client on server1 - Login with webmail on server2 - Delete a mail using webmail on server2 - Hit send/receive in the mail client

Hi All, I've been growing a large headache on this one, i have a number of LDAP servers behind loadbalancing, since 2 days i constantly get the error: Too many open files. Although I'm not a newbie with linux I'm unable to resolve this, I have took the following stept: Changed the /proc/sys/fs/file-max to 65535 Added the following configuration to /etc/security/limits.conf: ldap

I have two internet lines and I want to do equal cost loadbalancing on the two uplinks to the internet. This is what I do: ip route add 200.200.200.0/24 dev eth2 table 200 ip route add default via 200.200.200.254 dev eth2 table 200 ip route add 100.100.100.0/24 dev eth1 table 100 ip route add default via 100.100.100.254 dev eth1 table 100 ip route add 200.200.200.0/24 src 200.200.200.1 dev eth2

Bernhard Schmidt <berni at birkenwald.de> wrote: Hi, > Axel Luttgens <AxelLuttgens at swing.be> wrote: > > Hi Axel, > >> Le 11 f?vr. 2014 ? 08:34, Bernhard Schmidt a ?crit : >> >>> [...] >>> so Dovecot should reject in RCPT TO phase, but according to the logs of the >>> upstream Postfix it does so after END-OF-DATA >>>

I have been successfully implementing load balancing gateways for multiple ISP links at various locations using Julian''s patches and as suggested in LARTC HowTo. At one location, one of the ISPs is providing connectivity through a PPOE DSL link which has to be dialled in everytime to connect. The gateway has been configured on a Fedora Core 3 based system and I have recompiled the