similar to: Replication problem I have. And how I think I can get around problem.

Hello, I'm using dovecot 2.3.10 in OpenSUSE and I have configured a master/master replication between two backends, it works well but I have found an issue with the replication of the HIGHESTMODSEQ. When I move a set of message from a mailbox to other, e.g. move 3 messages from INBOX to Junk, the HIGHESTMODSEQ get different on each server, with no errors in the log: [Borrador] 34:34

If anyone's interested, especially client developers. It's been a bit quiet there after the initial rush. Begin forwarded message: > From: Randall Gellens <randy at qualcomm.com> > Date: August 1, 2008 5:08:39 AM EDT > To: ietf-imapext at imc.org, morg at ietf.org > Subject: [MORG] IMAP5 List > > At the MORG BOF, a discussion as to if the proposed IMAP

Begin forwarded message: > From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba at computer.org> > Date: 20. marraskuuta 2012 2.44.51 UTC+2.00 > To: imap5 at ietf.org, imapext at ietf.org, imap-protocol at u.washington.edu, imap-use at u.washington.edu > Subject: [imapext] News about Mark Crispin > Reply-To: imap5 at ietf.org > > Everyone here knows Mark Crispin -- or at least knows who he

Thank you for your help! Just to make things clear to me (and get a better understanding of gluster): So, if I make the slave cluster just distributed and node 1 goes down, data (say file.txt) that belongs to node 1 will not be synced. When node 1 comes back up does the master not realize that file.txt has not been synced and makes sure that it is synced when it has contact with node 1 again? So

just small update: - idfix tool (Directory Synchronization Error Remediation Tool / https://github.com/microsoft/idfix) shows just small issues like empty/missing displayName attrib in some of objects which I have corrected and no more issues present at all. - no errors from AAD connect event viewer: final log message is "Scheduler::SchedulerThreadMain : Completed configured scheduler

Hai,   Question..   2 DC's.  ( debian stretch samba 4.7.5 ) .   DC1 upgraded,  ( DC with FSMO roles)   samba-tool dbcheck --fix samba-tool dbcheck --cross-nc --fix   That fixed on DC1  6 errors. samba-tool drs showrepl show no error.   login on DC2. upgraded. samba-tool drs showrepl show no error and is in sync. samba-tool dbcheck --fix  shows 16 errors   uhm, synced, but not synced..   

At a customer we run dovecot-2.3.10 along with postfix and mariadb, using postfixadmin as GUI. Now I plan to migrate to a new hardware (bigger machine) and in the same step to migrate from Gentoo Linux to Debian Linux. So I think about how to get the mailboxes from A to B. We use one UID afaik: mail_home = /home/vmail/%d/%u mail_location = maildir:~ I read about dsync and wonder: * does it

Hi Kotresh, Thanks for response! After taking more tests with this specific geo-replication configuration I realized that file extended attributes trusted.gfid and trusted.gfid2path.*** are synced as well during geo replication. I?m concern about attribute trusted.gfid because value of the attribute has to be unique for glusterfs cluster. But this is not a case in my tests. File on

Hi again, I have been testing and reading up on other solutions and just wanted to check if my ideas are ok. I have been looking at dispersed volumes and wonder if there are any problems running replicated-distributed cluster on the master node and a dispersed-distributed cluster on the slave side of a geo-replication. Second thought, running disperesed on both sides, is that a problem (Master:

We are happy to help you out. Please find the answers inline. On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4:39 PM, Marcus Peders?n <marcus.pedersen at slu.se> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am planning my new gluster system and tested things out in > a bunch of virtual machines. > I need a bit of help to understand how geo-replication behaves. > > I have a master gluster cluster replica 2 > (in

Running Dovecot 2.0.8 on 32bit Centos5.5. The machine is a VMWare ESX VM. I'm seeing a lot of warning messages in syslog as follows: 2011-01-14T11:45:37.315917+08:00 imap4 dovecot: imap: Warning: Time jumped forwards 105 seconds 2011-01-14T11:46:00.598006+08:00 imap4 dovecot: imap: Warning: Time jumped forwards 106 seconds 2011-01-14T11:46:25.364405+08:00 imap4 dovecot: imap: Warning: Time

On dovecot 2.2.12 compiled from source I use ActiveSync with kolab-syncroton. When running a test i have this imap log: [29-Mar-2014 22:58:25 +0200]: [F658] S: A0004 OK Getmetadata completed. [29-Mar-2014 22:58:25 +0200]: [F658] C: A0005 SETMETADATA INBOX (/private/vendor/kolab/activesync "{\"DEVICE\":{\"601099122\":{\"ID\":

I can confirm this in a slightly different setting, but still using two-way sync between two dovecots. On e is 2.3.19.1 running on macOS Monterey, the other is 2.3.20 running in an alpine container on Ubuntu. Gerben Wierda (LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerbenwierda>) R&A IT Strategy <https://ea.rna.nl/> (main site) Book: Chess and the Art of Enterprise?Architecture

Hi Michal, Seems we are doing similar things at the moment: getting samba to work with azure AD. We also see the high CPU usage on the DC that the Azure AD Connect server connected to. Between 70 - 100 percent in our case. We are not seeing any replication issues after azure AD Connect, and I have a script that automatically checks replication every few minutes. I was the one reporting the

It might have a noticeable effect on clients. I encountered (probably triggered by this in some way?) that I was unable to het the 'read' bit set in macOS Mail.app. Maybe (as I am doing HA with round robin) the Mail.app client got to one dovecot repository on one tcp connection and then on the other. Is there a reason why syncing tis move from new to cur is a bad idea? Gerben Wierda

Am 17.04.20 um 03:37 schrieb @lbutlr: > On 15 Apr 2020, at 07:50, Stefan G. Weichinger <lists at xunil.at> > wrote: >> So I think about how to get the mailboxes from A to B. >> >> We use one UID afaik: >> >> mail_home = /home/vmail/%d/%u mail_location = maildir:~ >> >> I read about dsync and wonder: >> >> * does it make sense in

Hi All, 1) I read that the devs are working on supporting AD 2012 in 4.11, very cool. 2) I read SAMBA 4.11 can support 100,000 users and 120,000 computers, very cool. It appears that SAMBA is moving to be a viable file server, authentication and authorization server that can replace Microsoft Active Directory - Directory Services. Is this possible before 2030 for business with multiple sites

Hi Viktor, Answers inline On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 3:46 AM, Viktor Nosov <vnosov at stonefly.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking for glusterfs feature that can be used to transform data > between > volumes of different types provisioned on the same nodes. > It could be, for example, transformation from disperse to distributed > volume. > The possible option is to

Am 22.04.20 um 09:41 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > iterate_query = SELECT username as user FROM mailbox Ok, we enabled the 2 users and they synced (after a restart of one dovecot, btw). What irritates me: on the new server I find less files in /home/vmail than on the old server. So something is skipped or so. I try to compare now ..

Hi, I'm looking for glusterfs feature that can be used to transform data between volumes of different types provisioned on the same nodes. It could be, for example, transformation from disperse to distributed volume. The possible option is to invoke geo-replication between volumes. It seems is works properly. But I'm concern about requirement from Administration Guide for Red Hat Gluster