similar to: Folding@Home + CentOS 4.3 = success

Greetings, I have "inherited" a cDNA macroarray dataset that is structured as follows. Three different stressors were tested. For each stressor, there are two treatments (control and stressed). For each treatment, two biological replicates exist, and these are paired (i.e., there is a stressed array for colony A and a control array from this same colony). For one of these samples,

Whoops, forgot llvmdev On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > So i started by looking at naryreassociate, whose pass > description/reason listed for doing it is actually describes bug in > reassociate, and discovered that, in fact, reassociate seems broken, > and should be doing the right thing on most of your testcases. > >

Hi Daniel, I presume you mean, instead of assigning function arguments distinct ranks ( http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/Reassociate_8cpp_source.html#l00282), we should group function arguments in favor of existing pairings. You are not suggesting discarding the entire ranking system, right? I'll look into how that works on my benchmarks. AFAIK, we encountered some cases that seem beyond

I checked Best Buy again. The second system I recommended is in stock at the Best Buy in Warwick. It's on sale for $353. :) http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=8254569&type=product&id=1169512522677 I'm thinking about getting out of Dodge today to unwind so if you pick it up early today I can come up and help you install it and then just come home later in the day.

Anyone seen either of these "in the wild" yet? RHEL3/RHEL4 are install options so I'm assuming CentOS will just work out of the box, but I thought I'd ask here. The 2100 seems like a viable alternative to whitebox 1RU boxes that we currently use, especially with the new dual core processors. Cheers,

Jerry, Everybody: 3.0.25c compiled from source on a mandriva 2005le server in my no (AD, LDAP, Kerbose) environment. A full day of production and nothing more that a whimper out of the system. So, at least in my case 3.0.25c looks good.

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Jingyue Wu <jingyue at google.com> wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > I presume you mean, instead of assigning function arguments distinct > ranks > > (http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/Reassociate_8cpp_source.html#l00282), > we > > should

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Jingyue Wu <jingyue at google.com> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > I presume you mean, instead of assigning function arguments distinct ranks > (http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/Reassociate_8cpp_source.html#l00282), we > should group function arguments in favor of existing pairings. Existing = pairings reassociate already chose before *not* existing

Hi plugin-authors. So this is a little bit of take two on this question, but why can''t I access a singleton on the model calling my plugin? The crux of the full plugin below is: #logger.info self.class.to_s new_copy = self.class.new( @copyable_attributes ) the logger spits out "Datatype", but I get an error from rails saying: undefined method `datatype'' for

Hi, I''m looking into write scaffold generators that will, amoung other things, scaffold active record associations (eg. generate select boxes for belongs_to where you can choose a parent object) for quicker prototyping. But... My question is: Is there anyway of finding out what associations exist from examining the lodel classes themselves or indeed any other way of finding out this

Hi I'm not going to give the name of the proggy, because there may be Microsith trolls around, If someone wants the name please pm me. I've tried to run this VERY complex test generation proggy under Codeweavers Premium paid, using Xan.... 4.0 absolutely no go...not even an attempt, just balked. I tried it also under PCLinuxOS using Codeweavers and WINE and samo samo... I'm now

Hello, First let me apologize for posting about a GUI topic on here. There's a reason why I did that, and it's because the underlying concept of this is connected to Asterisk.Here's my situation: Twenty wifi clients connecting to our wireless router (Cisco Linksys E4200 loaded with Tomato). All these WiFi clients are running eyeBeam (in case you're wondering where the calls come

Just wondering if any 4.2 users out there have a favourite "dumb" PCI controller to add a couple of SATA ports to a motherboard that doesn't include SATA support. I'm not looking for anything fancy, just 2 SATA ports that a recent vintage kernel will recognize without a lot of configuration gymnastics. The intended use is for relatively light weight internet browser

Just a status note - my beta group is upgrading/upgraded to the new Thunderbird 2.0.0 (OS X & Win32 so far, Linux to come) and beating it up against Dovecot 1.0.0 and all is A-OK, nary a problem in sight. Obviously just an initial status report, but good mojo so far for those curious about trying it. -te -- Troy Engel | Systems Engineer Fluid, Inc | http://www.fluid.com

I'm not really a programmer and I recently came across this hack to insert a short sleep statement into auth-passwd.c within sshd. It seems to quickly confuse automated dictionary attacks. I've moved sshd to higher ports but apparently the cretins are now scanning to look for that and attacking on whatever port sshd shows up on. Anyway, the link to the hack is here:

Is it possible to create an alternate list for the people who insist on spending their days posting long-winded political commentary and opinion? Maybe something like centos-offtopic? Reading the list has gone from "fun" status to "chore." Just a suggestion. Cheers, C

Has anyone seen this before? [root at shelob rpm]# yum update rpmdb: Program version 4.2 doesn't match environment version error: db4 error(22) from dbenv->open: Invalid argument error: cannot open Packages index using db3 - Invalid argument (22) error: cannot open Packages database in /var/lib/rpm Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/yum", line 30, in ?

I have been trying to install CentOS 4.1 on a new server today. The installation went fine but the system doesn't boot. It doesn't even get to the Grub screen. The system has a 3ware 9500 series controller and 12 250GB SATA disks which are configured for RAID5 with one hot spare. I searched on the web and noticed that this is a Grub (and Lilo) limitation. Is there any way around it other

Anyone know of any PCI-e hardware RAID adapters? -- My "Foundation" verse: Isa 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness is of me, saith the LORD. -- carpe ductum -- "Grab the tape" CDTT (Certified Duct

Hi there, I'm trying to repurpose an unused machine (athlon XP 3000+) for my young daughter to use. It's on a motherboard with a VIA KT880 chipset and VIA integrated soundcard (VIA 8237). The card seems to be detected during boot time and shows up in the system log, but when I try to actually use the sound card within Gnome, there's no sound. The device is detected, but