similar to: file rights for dictionary file

Hi, we have a problem with our director proxy configuration. When we run on proxy server the doveadm command with -A switch, fails with the error: # doveadm -D quota get -A doveadm(user1): Debug: auth input: user=user1 proxy starttls=any-cert doveadm(user1): Error: Proxy is missing destination host doveadm: Error: Failed to iterate through some users If we execute the command with a single

Greetings everyone. My dovecot mail server doesn't execute *train-spam.sh* script I set, when moving an e-mail from "Inbox" to "Junk" within Outlook. However, it does it fine when using an online webmail client a.k.a. Roundcube Webmail. Here are few lines from my maillog file showing the situation. Any idea would be much appreciated. Log output of the mentioned process:

Hi Aki! Thank you for your reply. Sure, here are the related lines within my conf files and sieve scripts: https://hastepaste.com/view/Erk8Ra Thank you so much, Regards. Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com>, 5 Mar 2020 Per, 11:31 tarihinde ?unu yazd?: > > > On 5.3.2020 9.00, ?zg?r Kazancci wrote: > > Greetings everyone. > > > > My dovecot mail server

On 5.3.2020 9.00, ?zg?r Kazancci wrote: > Greetings everyone. > > My dovecot mail server doesn't execute *train-spam.sh* script I set, > when moving an e-mail from "Inbox" to "Junk" within Outlook. > > However, it does it fine when using an online webmail client a.k.a. > Roundcube Webmail. > > Here are few lines from my maillog file showing the

Ah. This is because you only match COPY, and outlook is doing APPEND+EXPUNGE instead. Aki On 5.3.2020 10.39, ?zg?r Kazancci wrote: > Hi Aki! > > Thank you for your reply. > > Sure, here are the related lines within my conf files and sieve > scripts: https://hastepaste.com/view/Erk8Ra > > Thank you so much, > Regards. > > Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at

I have given up on using any spam training with Outlook because Outlook seems rebuild the mails when you touch them. What it broke here: * Received Headers reshuffled and useless * x-mailer set to outlook There are multiple bug reports about this and MS seems to have fixed it once in Outlook 2010 but broke it again sometime later. I would be careful not to spam-report yourself with those mails

> On 26 May 2018 at 10:36 mail at sjemm.net wrote: > > > May 23, 2018 10:10 AM, mail at sjemm.net wrote: > > May 23, 2018 9:46 AM, "Aki Tuomi" <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > > >> On 23.05.2018 10:15, mail at sjemm.net wrote: > >> > >>> May 23, 2018 8:31 AM, "Aki Tuomi" <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote:

On 27.05.2018 21:16, mail at sjemm.net wrote: > May 27, 2018 8:52 AM, "Aki Tuomi" <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: >>> On 26 May 2018 at 10:36 mail at sjemm.net wrote: >>> >>> May 23, 2018 10:10 AM, mail at sjemm.net wrote: >>> May 23, 2018 9:46 AM, "Aki Tuomi" <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: >>> >>> On

On 23.05.2018 10:15, mail at sjemm.net wrote: > May 23, 2018 8:31 AM, "Aki Tuomi" <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: >> On 23.05.2018 09:13, mail at sjemm.net wrote: >> >>> May 20, 2018 8:01 PM, mail at sjemm.net wrote: >>>> May 20, 2018 2:47 PM, "Aki Tuomi" <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: >>> On 19 May 2018 at 16:40 mail

On 23.05.2018 09:13, mail at sjemm.net wrote: > May 20, 2018 8:01 PM, mail at sjemm.net wrote: >> May 20, 2018 2:47 PM, "Aki Tuomi" <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: >> >>>> On 19 May 2018 at 16:40 mail at sjemm.net wrote: >>>> >>>> May 18, 2018 10:01 PM, "Aki Tuomi" <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: >>>>

> On 19 May 2018 at 16:40 mail at sjemm.net wrote: > > > May 18, 2018 10:01 PM, "Aki Tuomi" <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > >> On 18 May 2018 at 21:44 mail at sjemm.net wrote: > >> > >> May 18, 2018 4:43 PM, "Aki Tuomi" <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > >> On 18 May 2018 at 17:38 mail at sjemm.net wrote: >

I have recently installed new untangle firewalls ( untangle.com) in Bridge mode at two office locations. Both offices collect mail from a Fedora 9, postfix,dovecot server at location #1. Since the install of the untangles i have been plagued by Thunderbird Errors while trying to POP email. The error says "RETR" command failed. If the user logs into the webmail (Squirrelmail) on the

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.53 Severity: minor On my mailserver i've got some message like the following (user infos obscured): Jan 21 08:01:01 lorien postfix/smtp[3005]: 39D2315533A: to=<someuser at somedomain.org>, relay=mail.somedomain.org[11.22.33.44]:25, conn_use=2, delay=1.3, delays=0.06/0/0.44/0.83, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 Message queued) This is a normal

The attached patch adds some whitespace to the recv_files() function declaration, and renames variable 'f' to 'f_out' in generate_files(). -------------- next part -------------- Index: generator.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/rsync/generator.c,v retrieving revision 1.93 diff -b -c -r1.93 generator.c *** generator.c 30 Jun

On Wednesday 21 of March 2018, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote: > On Monday 19 of March 2018, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.35.tar.gz > > https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.35.tar.gz.sig > > [...] > > > - Fix local name handling in v2.2.34 SNI code, bug found by cPanel. > > That change broke handling of such

Hi, I am running mentioned rsync version in daemon mode on a x86 machine which is a Gentoo Linux running kernel 2.4.26 and glibc 2.3.3_pre20040207. During the sync from another machine, the rsync daemon hangs; client receives no data and server waits on select() call. when this happens, rsync server process can only be killed by SIGKILL; no timeout occurs on server side. ssh is not being used for

hello i have a real stumper of an issue here and need some help! (config posted below) ok, so i'm building out a new mail system with v1.2.15 of dovecot on debian6 this new system is being designed to seamlessly migrate from an older dovecot mail system (v1.1.3). i have everything almost perfect but i've hit a wall which I need help on. so the existing mailboxes on the old server are

On 11.11.2016 12:22, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote: > On Friday 11 of November 2016, Felipe Gasper wrote: >> Hello, >> >> We?re rolling out large SNI deployments for our mail servers. Each domain >> gets an entry like this in the config: >> >> local_name mail.foo.com { >> ssl_cert = </ssl/domain_tls/*.foo.com/combined >> ssl_key =

On Thursday 20 of October 2016, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 20.10.2016 15:41, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote: > > On Thursday 20 of October 2016, Aki Tuomi wrote: > >> On 18.10.2016 14:16, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote: > >>> On Monday 17 of October 2016, KT Walrus wrote: > >>>>> On Oct 17, 2016, at 2:41 AM, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz <arekm at maven.pl> >

Can you provide some details on what those openssl commands returned? Aki On 20.07.2018 12:14, Martin Johannes Dauser wrote: > Hi, > > I recognised some funny behaviour on my server. IMAP clients which > won't send an Server Name Indication (SNI) sometimes get the wrong > certificate. I would expect that those clients always get the default > certificate (of my new