similar to: delegation of admin rights

Hi, We're upgrading a cluster of servers from v1.0.15 to v1.1.x or v1.2.x. It appears that the UIDL generation mechanism has changed, and thus we'll be getting POP3 dups with users that leave mail on server (which is a nasty practice, I know). From checking the sources, and performing a number of controlled tests in various scenarios, here is the outcome: upgrade from 1.0.15 to

List: Sorry for posting to this list but could not find step by step instructions anywhere nor get any concerned list to respond. Newbie to DNS technicals but can work with instructions if given in ./configure for complete idiots ;-) 1. I have taken a static IP from my ISP 203.134.221.162 and the ISP has put up an entry in APNIC whois (please check the same)...to me it seems incomplete, as it

On 8/18/2015 10:46 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote: > Hi, > > in this tipical setup (Dovecot/Director thate share Maildir via NFS) on > your NFS Server you have (about) 90% of read operations and only 10% of > write operations. > > If you see detailed stats for NFS operations you have 40-50% of GETATTR, > this means that NFS/Dovecot clients are caching data (mainly dovecot >

hi all, i'm managing a large installation of a dovecot cluster in director + NFS backend architecture and we are moving from NFSv3 to NFSv4. Our NFS server is a Netapp in clustered mode and reading technical specs of NFSv4 delegation feature it seems that enabling delegation in this type of dovecot architecture should bring great benefits: only one backend server access a specific mailbox at a

Hi, Just out of curiosity what is in nfsv4 delegation that you think would give a benefit on your configuration? If I read back the thread you seem to have dovecot configured with director ring in front of the backends. In that case Dovecot already manages storage in a way that only one of the backends is accessing each users data at a time. So I can?t see anything but problems form enabling

I ran samba-tool delegation show administrator and got this: athena:~# samba-tool delegation show administrator Account-DN: CN=Administrator,CN=Users,DC=edm-inc,DC=com UF_TRUSTED_FOR_DELEGATION: False UF_TRUSTED_TO_AUTHENTICATE_FOR_DELEGATION: False Is this legit?? Shouldn't the domain administrator be true for these? -- Bob Wooldridge EDM Incorporated

just a quick update: no issues with NFSv4.0 (load is slowly growing, currently ~7k mailboxes) instead, bad news from delegation front, we enabled it for a couple of days but we ran in ugly issues: processes went in "uninterruptible sleep" state, load average gets huge, reboot was the only escape :-( -brd Alessio Cecchi wrote: > Il 12/06/2015 13:02, brd ha scritto: > >Alessio

I''ve been working on a plugin called Http Test where I add HTML validation and link checking to controller and integration tests through an after filter in ApplicationController. I used to mix in a bunch of methods that I needed into the ApplicationController class, but to me this had a bad smell, so I broke much of the code out into separate classes that I delegate to.

Hey Guys, Wanted to let you know about an event delegation library that interacts with Scriptaculous that we''ve used to make interactive UI elements with really clean code. We used it with Scriptaculous to create the scrolling widgets on the homepage of http://javascriptmvc.com/. It''s called Controller and it is an event delegation library that helps logically organize your

Thank you Louis, I'll have a try! And yep, you're so right about using groups rather than users, so that's what we did ;) I'll try to test that today and come back to tell yall how it went. Have nice week-end if I can't come back today : ) M. 2016-09-02 16:09 GMT+02:00 L.P.H. van Belle via samba <samba at lists.samba.org >: > Hai Mathias. > > I think you

Alessio Cecchi wrote: [...] > Have you already try to run NFSv4? it's in place on a (very) small sample of mailboxes in dbox format, no issues up to now (Debian Wheezy mainline kernel) > When we switch to netapp and nfsv4 we had many problems (lock problems > and instability) and we had to go immediately to NFSv3. I don't know if > was a netapp problem or nfs client (Debian

Is there an DHCPv6 client in CentOS that supports prefix delegation correctly? The old version of dhclient can't set a requested prefix delegation length, so isn't very useful, and I can't get the even-older wide-dhcpv6 from EPEL to work. -- Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net>

On 2015-10-29 21:32, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 29/10/15 19:38, Davor Vusir wrote: >> >> >> mathias dufresne skrev den 2015-10-29 14:31: >>> I'm thick :D >>> I don't really understand more :( >>> >> >> No. I'm having trouble explaining. Maybe these threads are more >> enlightning: >>

Hi, Following that link https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/932455 we created a delegation to permit some group to add computers into AD. That works except if some computer with same name was already added (even if this computer with same name was previously cleanly removed from AD). Anyone who has idea what we missed? Cheers, M.

mathias dufresne skrev den 2015-10-29 14:31: > I'm thick :D > I don't really understand more :( > No. I'm having trouble explaining. Maybe these threads are more enlightning: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-April/191020.html and http://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg123646.html. > Samba can share file, printers and when samba hosts a domain samba is also

Hi, in this tipical setup (Dovecot/Director thate share Maildir via NFS) on your NFS Server you have (about) 90% of read operations and only 10% of write operations. If you see detailed stats for NFS operations you have 40-50% of GETATTR, this means that NFS/Dovecot clients are caching data (mainly dovecot index files) but they have to revalidate the cache frequently asking to the NFS

Hi, It has been a while that I did not come back to this topic, however I think I found a work-around for my initial problem. For information, what I was trying to do was: - Create an OU for a group of applications - Delegate control of this OU to a normal user (not helpdesk or domain admin) to be able to create groups and assign domain users to them The problem was, whenever I

Hi, last day I tried to enable "nfsv4 delegation" on my cluster (enable nfsv4.0 and read delegation on Netapp and remount the volume on Linux Centos 6.7 clients with Dovecot+Director). It was a failure, after some minutes the load on clients was high, and in dovecot.log I found these errors (repeated continuously): Aug 17 20:28:17 pop01eeh dovecot: imap(info at domain.com): Error:

On 04/11/15 15:09, mathias dufresne wrote: > As Davor wants to delegate I expect he does not want to give > Administrator password to these persons ;) And using a keytab to > avoid giving them the password is not a solution: they would be able > to perform everything they want on samba, which is certainly far from > the delegation he initially thought... Ah, what I posted was

Hi team. I am trying to allocate some rights to users in Active Directory, by using the "Delegation of Control Wizard" from ADUC. The steps I'm following were executed under the domain administrator user and are the following: 1. open ADUC and right click the top level OU (Ex. domain.org) 2. from the pop-up menu, select ?Delegate Control?? 3. click next in the first page of the