similar to: Warning: SSL is disabled because global ssl=no, ignoring ssl=yes for subsection

Hi, I would like to eliminate some of the error messages which appear in my dovecot logfile. I already understand that the message: doveconf: Warning: SSL is disabled because global ssl=no, ignoring ssl=yes for subsection is fixed in the current development code. However, I also get a lot of: lda(peter): Error: User peter doesn't have home dir set, disabling duplicate database Is there a

Hi Rowland, Thanks for getting back to me, appreciate your time and help. Apologies for the long response, I have tried to include as much information as possible. On Friday, 19 January 2024 at 10:12, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Sorry to be so long in replying to this, but life got in the way. > > You initially had an incorrect smb.conf and you

On Wednesday, 24 January 2024 at 20:45, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > That is what I was looking for, the default 'idmap config' is set to > 'hash', which shouldn't be used. Especially as it says 'idmap_hash - DO > NOT USE THIS BACKEND' at the top of 'man idmap_hash'. I can understand > using it for existing

On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 10:12:12 +0000 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 23:28:24 +0000 > unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 09:46, Rowland Penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > As far as I can see, unraid is based on

On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:47:27 +0000 unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > Thanks for getting back to me, appreciate your time and help. > Apologies for the long response, I have tried to include as much > information as possible. > > On Friday, 19 January 2024 at 10:12, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org>

On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 23:28:24 +0000 unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 09:46, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > As far as I can see, unraid is based on slackware, so it should > > work. Is it possible to check the ownership & permissions set on > > /mnt/user/PrivateShare

On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 17:31:46 +0000 unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I assumed that the rearranged config you provided was for feedback, Yes, they were just comments, but unraid should really fix their Samba setup. > I > haven't made any changes to the configuration based on those > comments. I'll send a message to the Unraid

I’ve tried that post .. but either I get a new scsi passthrough controller in device manager, but no dvd or the boot in windows hangs Either that method won’t work anymore or my config is bad .. im not really sure what to put in controller, target, bus and unit .. Skickat från min iPad > 17 apr. 2020 kl. 08:38 skrev Tony Brian Albers <tba@kb.dk>: > > Hi Andreas, > >

2020-04-17 11:37 skrev Peter Krempa: > [please don't top post] > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 10:54:24 +0200, Andreas Thörn wrote: >> I’ve tried that post .. but either I get a new scsi passthrough >> controller in device manager, but no dvd or the boot in windows hangs > > Note that you don't have to add a scsi <controller> if you already have > one.

On Wednesday, 24 January 2024 at 10:51, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I rearranged the smb.conf above and added comments: > > [global] > netbios name = Tower > server string = Media server > security = USER > workgroup = WORKGROUP > bind interfaces only = yes > interfaces = 192.168.66.10/24 127.0.0.1 > > # we don't do

On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 09:46, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > As far as I can see, unraid is based on slackware, so it should work. > Is it possible to check the ownership & permissions set on > /mnt/user/PrivateShare ? > > Is either apparmor or selinux running ? > > Rowland Thanks for the reply, I have included some responses

On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 08:53:38 +0000 unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > > Issue Description > After the upgrade of the Unraid server OS (unraid.net) from v6.9.2 to > v6.12.6 (which upgrades the version of Samba from 4.12.14 to 4.17.12) > access to shares stops working. > > Error Summary: > [2024/01/07 21:52:43.357676, 0, pid=93992,

Hi I have google to fine som info abut ZFS and I found that site hire. I have unraid now and are realy happy whit it. but to January I are going to upgrade my cpu to a 45watt quad core from intel that I are begun to use my server to encode my tv show iso when it on. so now I are begun to learn ZFS in vitualbox. but now to the question it I make a poll whit 4 2TB ind raidz1 can it so be convetet

Hello, Issue Description After the upgrade of the Unraid server OS (unraid.net) from v6.9.2 to v6.12.6 (which upgrades the version of Samba from 4.12.14 to 4.17.12) access to shares stops working. Error Summary: [2024/01/07 21:52:43.357676, 0, pid=93992, effective(1278739538, 1278738945), real(1278739538, 0)] ../../source3/smbd/smb2_service.c:168(chdir_current_service) chdir_current_service:

I am trying to use shfs to mount a remote root filesystem for a diskless workstation. The system downloads its kernel and initrd from a server. I have tried repeatedly to get a working installation of ssh on the initrd with no success. I finally got ssh to connect to the server. Normally when I use ssh the session goes as follows [arrummzen at localhost LFS-BOOK-6.0-HTML]$ ssh 192.168.11.10 -l

Hi Upgraded to 2.0.12 and when I restart I get this 'doveconf: Warning: SSL is disabled because global ssl=no, ignoring ssl=yes for subsection.' even though there is no subsection with ssl=yes. Regards Kilburn

On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:40:51 +0100, Simon Hobson wrote: > The think here is that you are into "backup" tools rather than the > general purpose tool that rsync is intended to be. Yes, that is true. Rsync serves so well as a core component to backup, I can be blind about "something other than rsync". I'll look at the tools you suggest. However, you've made be

[please don't top post] On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 10:54:24 +0200, Andreas Thörn wrote: > I’ve tried that post .. but either I get a new scsi passthrough controller in device manager, but no dvd or the boot in windows hangs Note that you don't have to add a scsi <controller> if you already have one. You can add the drive to the existing one. > > Either that method won’t

We have seen at a number of deployments, users experiencing slowness of GlusterFS over a period of time (as the volume usage grows). Some times it happens once in a day. This is due to updatedb cron job script that wakes up once in a day to index all the files it can find. It is configured by default to ignore network file systems such as NFS and lustre. Please add fuse.glusterfs to the list.

Hi there, I''m new to rails and I''ve been successful tinkering around but am miffed by the process of trying to connect to my mail server to receive email for ActiveMailer parsing. I''m hosted on TextDrive and have read the following article on the RubyonRails wiki: http://wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/pages/HowToReceiveEmailsWithActionMailer. I want to