similar to: FTS Compound Search

Hello, New subscriber here. I noticed that the FTS index is not used in compound searches. Is this expected? Tested in 2.0.0 and 2.0.8: . search BODY "waldo" * SEARCH . OK Search completed (0.000 secs). . SEARCH CHARSET UTF-8 OR SUBJECT "waldo" FROM "waldo" * SEARCH . OK Search completed (1.768 secs). . SEARCH CHARSET UTF-8 OR SUBJECT "waldo" BODY

>> New subscriber here. I noticed that the FTS index is not used in compound searches. >> Is this expected? Tested in 2.0.0 and 2.0.8: > >Yep. It's been in TODO for a while. I know this thread is quite old, but we have the same issue with v2.0.14 and squat. Would this issue also affect the Solr FTS backend? Thanks, Nikolai.

Hi Im using dovecot 1.2.16 with Solr setup for FTS. When searching a single field such as subject Dovecot will use the solr index. When searching multiple fields such as subject and body it does not use the index and uses the standard built in search which takes much longer. Is there any way to get Dovecot to use the solr or squat index when searching multiple fields? -- View this message in

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 9:19 AM, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> wrote: > Pranith, > > > >> We found that compound fops is not giving better performance in >> replicate and I am thinking of removing that code. Sent the patch at >> https://review.gluster.org/19655 >> >> > If I understand it right, as of now AFR is the only component

Hi I'm currently using dovecot 2.0 with squat fts which does a nice job. However I'm thinking about upgrading to dovecot 2.1 and the wiki isn't clear about which fts can or should be used with it. Is squat support dead ? As the wiki mentions that the config syntax is obsolete, I'm not sure if squat is obsolete also ? If not, what is the new syntax ? But in the case squat is

Hi there, I have a Java process that writes HDF5 files with the following approximate structure: group "xxx" { group "yyy" { dataset {} dataset {} } group "zzz" { dataset {} dataset {} } } where dataset is a rank one dataspace having a compound datatype defined as: H5T_UNIX_TIME, float, float, float, float I

Hi folks. I'm experimenting with the Squat plugin. I can execute search commands via direct interaction with IMAP, but I never see the expected dovecot.index.search index file appear in the spool. I'm concerned that I've misconfigured something that is preventing the creation of those indices. Is there a facility to have the squat plugin generate debugging messages so I

I don't know if this was supposed to have changed with dovecot2, but http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS shows fts = squat solr so, since I have the lucene plugin?"fts = lucene" works by itself?I tried fts = squat lucene but: $ doveadm index '*' doveadm(dave): Error: fts: Failed to initialize backend 'squat lucene': Unknown backend So, is that syntax

Hello, i am currently using squat dovecot, but some users that have lots os emails ( 1GB ) are complaining about speed. Iam using dovecot 2.0.13 on debian 6 my squat conf is plugin { fts = squat fts_squat = partial=4 full=5 } I am thinking in maybe start to use Solr, so any one can help me with an decision? I am probably gonna update dovecot to 2.1 next year. and them maybe change the FTS

Hi all, ive been playing with squat indexes. Up to about 300.000 emails in a single mailbox this was working flawlessly. The search index file is about 500MB at that time. Ive now added some more emails, and at 450.000 or so emails im seeing a serious problem with squat index creation. It takes...f o r e v e r . The .tmp file is being so slowly, it will probably take 2-3 hours to create. Upto

It seems, that dovecot-shared ignored by fts squat and dovecot.index.search/dovecot.index.search.uids created with wrong permissions. This makes squat unusable with symlinked shared maildirs. -- WBR, Anton Yuzhaninov

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 02:56:42PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote: > hmm_range_fault() returns an array of page frame numbers and flags for > how the pages are mapped in the requested process' page tables. The PFN > can be used to get the struct page with hmm_pfn_to_page() and the page size > order can be determined with compound_order(page) but if the page is larger > than order 0

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:10:05AM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote: > > On 6/22/20 10:25 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 02:56:42PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote: > > > hmm_range_fault() returns an array of page frame numbers and flags for > > > how the pages are mapped in the requested process' page tables. The PFN > > > can be used to

Hello all. I have a problem with collapsing by a key in a compound database. I have 2 databases (e.g. clients and client branches), both of them have the same attribute (with the same valueno), `client_id'. What I need is to search in both these databases and collapse results by `client_id' to get client IDs (set_collapse_key is used with collapse_max=1). The problem is that I receive 2

On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 12:20:07PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote: > hmm_range_fault() returns an array of page frame numbers and flags for > how the pages are mapped in the requested process' page tables. The PFN > can be used to get the struct page with hmm_pfn_to_page() and the page size > order can be determined with compound_order(page) but if the page is larger > than order 0

I am having problems with the 'if' syntax. I have an n x 4 matrix, X say. The first two columns hold x, y values and I am attempting to fill the second two columns with the quadrant in which the datapoint (x, y) is and with the heading angle. So I have two problems 1) how to do this elegantly (at which I've failed as I can't seem to vectorize the problem) and 2) how to

Hi, I am not sure its intended or a fault in the newest Dovecot versions. I have been using Dovecot v1.2.15 on Debian squeeze and FTS is working as expected. When I search a quoted string "very good", I get 107 results including plain and HTML emails which have this phrase. In order to compare the benefits of lucene over squat, I recently started testing dovecot v2.2.13 on Debian Sid

This happened from one user near noon on the 17th and 19th (today) of this month. From the backtrace it looks like they were searching, but I won't know for sure unless I need to ask them. Is this possibly fixed already? I just haven't upgraded dovecot in a while due to lack of problems. The sig11 happened a few dozen times, a few seconds apart each day. I have one coredump from

On 8 May 2020, at 16:06, Ralph Campbell wrote: > On 5/8/20 12:51 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 12:20:07PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote: >>> hmm_range_fault() returns an array of page frame numbers and flags for >>> how the pages are mapped in the requested process' page tables. The PFN >>> can be used to get the struct page with

We usually zero-initialize vectors like string_vector names = empty_vector; Allocating and zeroing separately is frequently useful however. Document the pattern string_vector names; names = (string_vector)empty_vector; where "(string_vector)empty_vector" is a compound literal. Link: http://mid.mail-archive.com/20230221183810.vjilfbmj3woqivlj at redhat.com Suggested-by: Eric