similar to: Patch proposition to implement a new workaround: tb-lsub-flags

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "Patch proposition to implement a new workaround: tb-lsub-flags"

2011 Mar 03
0
TB, dovecot & trailing slash - again
Hi there, I have been browsing the mailing list archives in search of a solution to my problem, related to the quite infamous "trailing slash" issue with Thunderbird, but I don't seem to have found any closely related discussion. Please forgive me if this problem has already found a solution. Here I go; We use a lot of TB clients (2.x and 3.x), and we are using Dovecot 1.2.4
2009 Aug 11
3
dovecot 1.2.3: TB fails to unsubscribe folder after deletion
Hi, I'm running dovecot 1.2.3 with "imap_client_workarounds = tb-extra-mailbox-sep" and noticed that after deleting a folder (moving to Trash and emptying it on exit) that folder in Trash still keeps subscribed. I think the reason for that behavior is that the call for mailbox_list_set_subscribed() in imap/cmd-subscribe.c (line 84) is fed with the original mailbox name and not the
2009 Jun 30
0
Proposition for 6.1 and 7.1 Channel Mappings
Vorbis Community, Seeing as how DTS-HD and Dolby TrueHD decoders are becoming more accessible, I believe now may be a good time to standardize channel mappings for 6.1 and 7.1 audio. MPlayer currently implements 7.1 audio for Vorbis like so: FL FR RL RR FC LFE SL SR. Thank you, William Swartzendruber -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2018 Mar 17
0
Proposition: 7.0 => 7 in library names
On 17 Mar 2018, at 14:48, Sylvestre Ledru via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Context: I have been packaging the llvm toolchain for Debian & Ubuntu > and also providing these packages on https://apt.llvm.org/. > One of the goal is to have different versions co-installable. For that, > I am renaming the binaries and libraries. > > Now, as we are not
2010 Dec 06
0
[LLVMdev] [LAD] Project proposition: llvm based dsp engine
Hi, and thanks for the feedback. >My own gut feeling on this is that you'd be better off figuring out >how to do this in the context of Faust, which already does a important >subset of what you are describing, though notably without (I think) >the LLVM part. Surely a contribution to the discussion by the Faust people would be welcome; and even more than to the discussion :->.
2005 Oct 25
0
proposition of writing the article to Linux+ DVD magazine
Good morning, I'm working at Software publishing house which publishes magazines from the IT field. One of them is Linux+ DVD magazine (please visit our web www.lpmagazine.org). I'm looking for the linux developpers who are interrested in cooperation with the redaction of Linux+ DVD by writing the article concerning the scurity in Linux (for exemple OpenBSD 3.8, or to transmit the
2004 Nov 23
3
Re: List proposition
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 20:26, ~mg@a.org wrote: > Hello everyone! > > We have been thinking about something<early snip> With respect, this could have come from anyone... and looks like it did from the DNS records. I appreciate it's not an easy situation, but there must be some way of doing this where it does not look like a scam? Tell tale signs: - Don't tell anyone about
2004 Nov 23
2
Re: list proposition
>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2004, Adam Greenbaum <lists@refinitive.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 20:26, ~mg@a.org wrote: >> > > Hello everyone! >> > > >> > > We have been thinking about something<early snip> >> > >> > With respect, this could have come from anyone... and looks like it >> > did from the DNS
2010 Dec 06
1
[LLVMdev] [LAD] Project proposition: llvm based dsp engine
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Maurizio De Cecco <jmax at dececco.name> wrote: > I have been looking for a while to  LLVM as a possible technology to build a > DSP execution engine, providing the runtime flexibility needed by real-time > interactive DSP applications (like patcher languages), or by plug-in based > processors, and in the same moment > the powerful link time
2007 Oct 12
1
Wiki FrontPage Proposition
Hi guys, What do you think about this structure: http://wiki.centos.org/FrontPageProposal?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=wiki-structure-5-en.png Cheers, al.
2018 Mar 22
1
Proposition: 7.0 => 7 in library names
Hello, On 17/03/2018 15:22, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 17 Mar 2018, at 14:48, Sylvestre Ledru via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Context: I have been packaging the llvm toolchain for Debian & Ubuntu >> and also providing these packages on https://apt.llvm.org/. >> One of the goal is to have different versions co-installable. For that,
2011 Jan 11
1
--detect-renamed for mac users : proposition of a modification
Hello, Object of my mail : 1/ stick a problem of incompatibylity between 2 patches (fileflags.diff & detect-renamed.diff) 2/ proposition of a correction I wanted to run rsync on a mac (OS X 10.6.5) with the --detect-renamed option. I therefore tried to compile rsync with the 3 relevant patches : - fileflags.diff - crtimes.diff - detect-renamed.diff But the patch detect-renamed.diff is
2018 Mar 17
2
Proposition: 7.0 => 7 in library names
Hello, Context: I have been packaging the llvm toolchain for Debian & Ubuntu and also providing these packages on https://apt.llvm.org/. One of the goal is to have different versions co-installable. For that, I am renaming the binaries and libraries. Now, as we are not using the minor version (the Y in X.Y.Z), there isn't much point in calling our tools foo-7.0 as we won't create a
2007 Jan 23
2
rc18 dies with Query: LSUB "" "*" failed on Squirrelmail
Just upgraded, and then had to downgrade straight away. Couldn't get our Squirrelmail page up. Logged in fine etc. but got: Query: LSUB "" "*" failed, refer to server logs etc. Nothing in logs that shows error with mail_debug=yes What should I be looking for? Gavin. -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1224 279484 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44
2010 Jan 09
1
Problem in LSUB?
Hi guys, I'm not 100% sure about the dovecot version in the server because I don't have access to it, just an account, but I think it's 1.1-rc4 I'm an email client developer and I have a doubt about the behaviour of LSUB that I think it's buggy. See this chat with the server 40 LIST "" INBOX * LIST (\HasChildren) "." "INBOX" 40 OK List
2004 Jul 26
1
bug in LSUB command
RFC 2060 section 7.2.2 and 7.2.3 says the "The LIST response occurs as a result of a LIST command." and "The LSUB response occurs as a result of an LSUB command." Dovecot presently returns the LIST response for the LSUB command. -- Geo Carncross <geocar at internetconnection.net> Internet Connection
2005 Apr 11
1
LSUB matches prefix bug?
I think I've found a minor bug in the LSUB command: . LSUB "" "*" gives ... * LIST (\Noselect) "/" "#maildir" ^^^^ * LSUB () "/" "#maildir/test4" where I have a namespace with prefix "#maildir/". Here's a patch to make it not list the namespace prefix in an LSUB command (or should it list it as 'LSUB
2006 Oct 28
2
LSUB and namespaces - how to get rid of multible prefixes
I'm using dovecot 1.0.rc7 and Squirrelmain 1.4.8 using IMAP on a Debian 3.1 Testing system, and I'm having a problem. When Squirrelmail (or other IMAP clients) submits an LSUB "" "*%", dovecot responds with: Request: A004 LSUB "" "*%" Response: * LSUB () "/" "INBOX.Sent" * LSUB () "/" "INBOX.Trash" *
2007 Jan 31
1
Query: LSUB "" "*" still on rc19
Hi all, We've downgraded to rc17 for the past week or so, as when we upgraded to rc19, this error did go, but came back again. ERROR: Could not complete request. Query: LSUB "" "*" Reason Given: Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more information. Looks like it never helped us in rc19. Back on rc17 just now, which we still have to restart a few times a day,
2007 Feb 09
0
LSUB * error solved on rc22
Hi All, Just a quickie to say ew are running the latest version now. Our LSUB error was due to: open(/var/mail/public/.Projects/dovecot-acl) failed: Permission denied Thanks. -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1224 279484 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 824887 E ghenry at suretecsystems.com Open Source. Open Solutions(tm). http://www.suretecsystems.com/