similar to: dovecot ocf resource script

Hi, Can u please explain for what purpose pacemaker cluster used here? Regards, Jiffin On Thursday 07 December 2017 06:59 PM, Tomalak Geret'kal wrote: > > Hi guys > > I'm wondering if anyone here is using the GlusterFS OCF resource > agents with Pacemaker on CentOS 7? > > yum install centos-release-gluster > yum install glusterfs-server

Hello Everyone, I was wondering if there is an OCF resource agent already created for Asterisk, allowing for it to be able to include nodes in a pacemaker cluster? This is for a corosync/pacemaker cluster. Cheers, Nick.

Hi guys I'm wondering if anyone here is using the GlusterFS OCF resource agents with Pacemaker on CentOS 7? yum install centos-release-gluster yum install glusterfs-server glusterfs-resource-agents The reason I ask is that there seem to be a few problems with them on 3.10, but these problems are so severe that I'm struggling to believe I'm not just doing something wrong. I created

> > With the node in standby (just one is online in this example, but another > is configured), I then set up the resources: > > pcs node standby > pcs resource create gluster_data ocf:heartbeat:Filesystem > device="/dev/cl/lv_drbd" directory="/gluster" fstype="xfs" > pcs resource create glusterd ocf:glusterfs:glusterd > pcs resource create

On 07/12/2017 13:47, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote: > Out of curiosity,? did you write it or you found those > commands somewhere else? I wrote it, using what little experience of pcs I have so far - haven't actually been able to find any documented steps/instructions. :( Although this blog - http://www.tomvernon.co.uk/blog/2015/01/gluster-activepassive-cluster/ - suggested I was on the right

Hi Everyone, I have a question regarding reverse quota_warnings. I'm building a new setup, and I would like to block sending messages if a person is over his/her quota limit. Although this can be accomplished using a quota_warning script, I can't find how to accomplish the reverse. Has anyone tried to do something like this? By looking at the source code: ---- quote ---- if

Hi, Today I was testing with dovecot 2.0 rc5 and experienced some odd behaviour with quota_warning rules. It's reproducable. When I set a rule (this one simply writes some message to a text file) and go over quota (2 messages in this case), it works as expected. But if I restart my client, remove one message, restart my client again and remove the last message from my inbox, it executes

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I think I stumbled on at least two bugs in the CentOS 7.2 pacemaker package, though I'm not quite sure if or where to report it. I'm using the following package to set up a 2-node active/passive cluster: [root at clnode1 ~]# rpm -q pacemaker pacemaker-1.1.13-10.el7_2.4.x86_64 The installation is up-to-date on both nodes as of the

Hi Chris, I've properly started looking into this yesterday. NSD definitely shouldn't crash, still working on that. However, the provided zone is invalid too(?) I'm not the foremost expert on NSEC3 (or even DNSSEC), but is seems an NSEC3 is missing for bar.foo.com. Empty non-terminals should still have an NSEC3 RR. (Of course, the delegation point should be at bar.foo.com. too and

I have seen many references online to being able to use OCFS2 with Pacemaker, but the documentation I have been able to find is very Sparse. I have kernel 2.6.29, and the latest DLM and Pacemaker (using openais) and OCFS2-Tools from GIT. (As of June 13). I was able to build ocfs2_controld.pcmk ... (With some minor changes to the makefile for my install) I noticed the OCF version of o2cb is not

Hi everyone, I need some help to setup my configuration failover system. My goal is to have a redundance system using Xen + DRBD + Corosync + Pacemaker On Xen I will have one virtual machine. When this computer has network down, I will do a Live migration to the second computer. The first configuration I will need is a crossover cable, won''t I? It is really necessary? Ok, I did it. eth0

Hi everybody, We use a Dovecot setup with GlusterFS. Dovecot 1.1.2 and GlusterFS 1.3.9. I enabled the following options (I don't have posix-locks translators): lock_method = dotlock dotlock_use_excl = no mmap_disable = yes mail_nfs_index = yes mail_nfs_storage = yes I receive the following error message. Aug 7 09:38:51 mta2 dovecot: POP3(somebody at domain.tld): nfs_flush_fcntl:

----- On Oct 7, 2020, at 7:26 PM, Peter Crowther peter.crowther@melandra.com wrote: > Bernd, another option would be a mismatch between the message that "virsh > destroy" issues and the message that force_stop() in the pacemaker agent > expects to receive. Pacemaker is trying to determine the success or failure of > the destroy based on the concatenation of the text of the

Hi Sagar, Are you getting a particular error? Because the same method should work just fine in NSD. Simply open the corresponding zone file (as configured in nsd.conf) and put that line in there. Best regards, Jeroen Koekkoek On Fri, 2023-07-21 at 09:14 +0200, Sagar Acharya via nsd-users wrote: > How do I add SRV record to my zone file? > > Eg. In pdns I have > >

Hi Chris, I can reproduce with your zone. Thanks! Best, Jeroen On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 14:07 +0000, Chris LaVallee wrote: > > Hi Jeroen, > > > Attached is the zone I used. Did you add the record for a.bar ? > > > Ex: > > > a.bar ? 300 ? ? IN ?NS ? ? ?ns.somewhere.net. > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > >

Hi Jeroen, I just realised that the version I use is very old -- 4.1. So first what I should do -- updating it and only then come here , asking for clarification. ??, 27 ????. 2024??. ? 14:19, Jeroen Koekkoek <jeroen at nlnetlabs.nl>: > Hi Peter, > > NSD processes updates in batches. xfrd receives the [AI]XFR and > schedules a reload for the main process, which in turn forks

Hello, We are having a problem with a 3-node cluster based on Pacemaker/Corosync with 2 primary DRBD+OCFS2 nodes and a quorum node. Nodes run on Debian Squeeze, all packages are from the stable branch except for Corosync (which is from backports for udpu functionality). Each node has a single network card. When the network is up, everything works without any problems, graceful shutdown of

Bernd, another option would be a mismatch between the message that "virsh destroy" issues and the message that force_stop() in the pacemaker agent expects to receive. Pacemaker is trying to determine the success or failure of the destroy based on the concatenation of the text of the exit code and the text output by virsh; if either of those have changed between virsh versions, and

Jeroen Koekkoek via nsd-users <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> wrote: > Anand's answer is entirely correct. > > Once 4.8.0 is released, zone files will be written once per hour by > default. I'm confused now :-) Arnand said the "database" option is being removed. Does this mean the database will always be created, or NEVER be created? I always wondered why

Hi Jeroen, Attached is the zone I used. Did you add the record for a.bar ? Ex: a.bar 300 IN NS ns.somewhere.net. Chris ________________________________ From: Jeroen Koekkoek <jeroen at nlnetlabs.nl> Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2024 5:33 AM To: Chris LaVallee <clavallee at edg.io>; nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> Subject: Re: