similar to: Strange issue in NFS

Hi Timo, I Trying to integrate my antispam with dovecot, using the imap folder to do certain actions. I Do almost every thing, but i have some problems saving the message. Explaining this function, i try to use a imap folder like a "collector folder", the user append a message from outside (ie another imap or pop message) to this folder, and i don't want to copy this message, i

I Build a plugin, that do some stuffs with a email. To get the input istream, i use the "get_stream" function, like zlib does. I create a concat_stream, with the full_input[3]; struct istream *full_input[3]; //this like zlib input = imail->data.stream; //first input, using the input full_input[0] = i_stream_create_header_filter(input, HEADER_FILTER_EXCLUDE | HEADER_FILTER_NO_CR,

Hi Timo.... I Modify the plugin autocreate, that create and subscribe a mailbox to user. My modification consist in do the inverse, if my user don't have permission to create and subscribe a folder, the plugin remove and unsubscribe. My function is called in the same place that create and subscribe is called, just seeing if my flag is "create or delete". My function i copy from

Hello. Probably only Timo can help-me with this. I have a self-made plugin based on the zlib plugin that i use to cryptograph the messages at inbox. As a side-effect of the cryptography, my plugin changes the size of the message, but until 2.0.19 this works well with dovecot index and the W/S flags. But now, i'm going to upgrade to 2.1.17 and now i have these messages on log at my test

Hi Quentin, Yes, the code allows to process connected instructions. Although it should be taken into account that the instruction next to the current processed instruction must never be erased because this invalidates iterator. I've been fixing a bug in AArch64InstrInfo::optimizeCompareInstr: instructions are converted into S form but it's not checked that they produce the same flags as

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> wrote: > On 27/08/14 23:50, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> This fixes virtio on Xen guests as well as on any other platform >> that uses virtio_pci on which physical addresses don't match bus >> addresses. >> >> This can be tested with: >> >> virtme-run --xen

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> wrote: > On 27/08/14 23:50, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> This fixes virtio on Xen guests as well as on any other platform >> that uses virtio_pci on which physical addresses don't match bus >> addresses. >> >> This can be tested with: >> >> virtme-run --xen

Rusty, Anthony, Dor, I need your brain power :-) On smp guests I have seen a problem with virtio (the version in curent Avi's git) which do not occur on single processor guests: kernel BUG at /space/kvm/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:228! illegal operation: 0001 [#1] Modules linked in: ipv6 CPU: 2 Not tainted Process swapper (pid: 0, task: 000000000f83e038, ksp: 000000000f877d70) Krnl

Rusty, Anthony, Dor, I need your brain power :-) On smp guests I have seen a problem with virtio (the version in curent Avi's git) which do not occur on single processor guests: kernel BUG at /space/kvm/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:228! illegal operation: 0001 [#1] Modules linked in: ipv6 CPU: 2 Not tainted Process swapper (pid: 0, task: 000000000f83e038, ksp: 000000000f877d70) Krnl

--- In english --- Hello! I am to implement a new architecture of the network in my company but I do not know right where to start ... need help! Currently 90% of my servers are virtual machines under Xen. I have many valid IP networks and all Hypervisors are configured in bridge mode, to simplify. We have 3 VMWare ESX Hypervisor also in bridge mode. Some networks are exclusive to certain

Hi, I find it's quite strange how condition dependent instructions are processed in PeepholeOptimizer::runOnMachineFunction: 01577 if ((isUncoalescableCopy(*MI) && 01578 optimizeUncoalescableCopy(MI, LocalMIs)) || 01579 (MI->isCompare() && optimizeCmpInstr(MI, &MBB)) || 01580 (MI->isSelect() && optimizeSelect(MI,

There is a race in virtio_net, dealing with disabling/enabling the callback. I saw the following oops: kernel BUG at /space/kvm/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:218! illegal operation: 0001 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: sunrpc dm_mod CPU: 2 Not tainted 2.6.25-rc1zlive-host-10623-gd358142-dirty #99 Process swapper (pid: 0, task: 000000000f85a610, ksp: 000000000f873c60) Krnl PSW : 0404300180000000

There is a race in virtio_net, dealing with disabling/enabling the callback. I saw the following oops: kernel BUG at /space/kvm/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:218! illegal operation: 0001 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: sunrpc dm_mod CPU: 2 Not tainted 2.6.25-rc1zlive-host-10623-gd358142-dirty #99 Process swapper (pid: 0, task: 000000000f85a610, ksp: 000000000f873c60) Krnl PSW : 0404300180000000

Avi, this fixes a problem that was introduced by the virtio_reset patches. Can you apply that fix to kvm.git as a bugfix, as the virtio_reset infrastructure is not on Linus upstream yet? Anthony, Dor, are you ok with that change? -- With the latest virtio_reset patches I got the following oops: Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference at virtual kernel address 0000000000000000 Oops: 0004

Avi, this fixes a problem that was introduced by the virtio_reset patches. Can you apply that fix to kvm.git as a bugfix, as the virtio_reset infrastructure is not on Linus upstream yet? Anthony, Dor, are you ok with that change? -- With the latest virtio_reset patches I got the following oops: Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference at virtual kernel address 0000000000000000 Oops: 0004

Hello Developers, it seems that i discovered a bug in btrfs while testing it on a zSeries mainframe :-) ## Test environment: - IBM System z900 Mainframe - Debian SID with 64 Bit Kernel - GIT Sources from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-unstable.git - System runs as z/VM guest - 3 Virtual CPUs - 1 GB RAM Storage ## Initial Test Setup - Setup a Debian SID System with

Hi all, with the recent kernel 3.19, I get a kernel warning when I start my KVM guest on s390 with virtio balloon enabled: [ 0.839687] do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=1 set at [<0000000000174a1e>] prepare_to_wait_event+0x7e/0x108 [ 0.839694] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 0.839697] WARNING: at kernel/sched/core.c:7326 [ 0.839698]

Hi all, with the recent kernel 3.19, I get a kernel warning when I start my KVM guest on s390 with virtio balloon enabled: [ 0.839687] do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=1 set at [<0000000000174a1e>] prepare_to_wait_event+0x7e/0x108 [ 0.839694] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 0.839697] WARNING: at kernel/sched/core.c:7326 [ 0.839698]

Folks, we have seen the following bug with 3.16 as a KVM guest. It suspect the blk-mq rework that happened between 3.15 and 3.16, but it can be something completely different. [ 65.992022] Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference in virtual kernel address space [ 65.992187] failing address: ccccccccccccd000 TEID: ccccccccccccd803 [ 65.992363] Fault in home space mode while using kernel

Folks, we have seen the following bug with 3.16 as a KVM guest. It suspect the blk-mq rework that happened between 3.15 and 3.16, but it can be something completely different. [ 65.992022] Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference in virtual kernel address space [ 65.992187] failing address: ccccccccccccd000 TEID: ccccccccccccd803 [ 65.992363] Fault in home space mode while using kernel