similar to: good value of vsz_limit

Hi Timo and the other directors of the following pigeonhole dovecot sieve I wonder what are the strengths and weaknesses of my config, and what do I need to change to stick more to a best configuration r13151 ~]# /usr/sbin/dovecot -n # 2.0.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.32.2-xxxx-grs-ipv6-32 i686 CentOS release 5.5 (Final) auth_mechanisms = plain login base_dir =

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hello dovecot network hello timo hello all others reader I do not use the namespace notation in my dovecot configuration. I use Maildir mailboxes that get stuck in /home users. my question is simple I advise you to use the namespace and what should be its own configuration. I use lda to issue the emails my dovecot -n ~]# /usr/sbin/dovecot -n #

hi guys hi master of "Fu" hi Timo I am having problems to migrate to dovecot dovecot 2.0.18 to 2.1.1 I encounter fatal errors. I created it myself rpms available here http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/dovecot-2.1.1-1.centme.el5.src.rpm I can not run dovecot with this config file like this http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/dovecot-2.1.1-1.centme.el5.src.rpm i run this config ks37777 ~]# dovecot -n #

hello guys hello master Timo i build the last release of dovecot on my centos 5 work well and fine but what the correct value for client limit in service auth { client_limit=6000 } and service anvil { client_limit=6000 } my current dovecot -n ks37777 i386]# dovecot -n # 2.1.1: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.31.5-xxxx-rt14-ipv6-32 i686 CentOS release 5.7 (Final) auth_mechanisms =

hello all reader hello list hello centos network since I've installed dovecot deliver. e-mails no longer pass through amavisd. amavisd no longer work. c is to say I have no anti-spam and anti virus my postconf and dovecot -n [root at r13151 ~]# postconf -n alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases , hash:/etc/postfix/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases , hash:/etc/postfix/aliases body_checks =

hello all reader hello list hello dovecot network since I've installed dovecot deliver. e-mails no longer pass through amavisd. amavisd no longer work. c is to say I have no anti-spam and anti virus my postconf and dovecot -n [root at r13151 ~]# postconf -n alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases , hash:/etc/postfix/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases , hash:/etc/postfix/aliases body_checks

hi timo very very good job you realize for the community here I have a very strange problem with doveadm I actually use a configuration file parameters in which the parameters are placed carefully My problem appears when I run this command doveadm expunge -A mailbox Trash savedbefore 30d i post command and result to the terminal [fakessh at r13151 ~]$ doveadm expunge -A mailbox Trash savedbefore

hello folks hello Timo hello all the guru I met a few times the problem or an email that passes through a sieve script is silently discard after delivery but never returned to the inbox all testimonials are welcome -- ?http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7 ?gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 dear honorable doctor timo reading the list I saw appear a new style for the "writing of INBOX". namely this example mailbox Drafts { special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Junk { special_use = \Junk } mailbox Sent { special_use = \Sent } mailbox "Sent Messages" { special_use = \Sent }

hi folks hi timo , is a good day for you I use a double deliverance root and user i use lda deliver dovecot authentification and since the switch to 2.0.4 I encounter the problem that the box Maildir root for the name of the INBOX after passing sieve is the type root at nsXXXX.ovh.net how to correct the problem Timo your lights --

Hello Timo and dovecot teamwork, We have dovecot 2.0.10 installed with this configuration: # dovecot -n # 2.0.10: /usr/local/dovecot/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.18-92.1.18.el5 x86_64 Scientific Linux SL release 5.2 (Boron) auth_cache_size = 500 k auth_cache_ttl = 1000 secs disable_plaintext_auth = no first_valid_uid = 501 lock_method = dotlock mail_fsync = always mail_gid = vmail

hello centos list hello guys hello master of Fu I want to know the different changes to be applied in the config bind97 because I use dnssec and differences may be present. I do not know they are the differences that may exist between centos 5.7 and bind to bind to centos 6.2 I want to know the small differences that may be present in the config bind in the concerns of my desire to perform

Hi, I'm working on a setup of dovecot 2 + netqmail + vpopmail 5.5 but auth doesn't works :( dovecot -n # 2.0.1: /etc/dovecot/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.35.1-rscloud x86_64 Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS auth_debug = yes auth_debug_passwords = yes auth_mechanisms = plain login cram-md5 auth_verbose = yes auth_verbose_passwords = plain disable_plaintext_auth = no log_path =

Le mardi 21 juin 2011 15:32, Tom Eastep a écrit : > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > From: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net> > Reply-to: Shorewall Users <shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > To: Shorewall Users <shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] routestopped 4.2 to 4.4 > Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:37:02 -0700 >

Hi, I have some out of memory errors in my logs (file errors.txt attached) I'm using dovecot 2.0.19, I can see some memory leaks fix in hg after the 2.0.19 release but they seem related to imap-login service, I attached my config too, is something wrong there? Should I really increase the limit based on my settings? Can these commits fix the reported leak?

Hi all Hi list my linux box is CentOS 5.4 it is properly updated I use the [root at r13151 ~]# rpm -qa | grep roundcubemail roundcubemail-0.2.1-1.el5.kb [root at r13151 ~]# roundcubemail , which is contained in the deposit karanbir singh I preferred to continue using the version contained in the official (depot karanbir singh its offcial repositories yes or not ) repositories of CentOS I

it is, I'm coming I do not understand the need to recreate and validate the file keyset-en ....... I then recreate a good record with the key in this file and my past signatures are good. I did not understand correctly the operation of dlv keyset files and I recreated downgrade bind to the stable version 9.3 of CentOS 5.5 and using webmin. can you give me the command to use to create files

rehello centos list after some modifications rpm fedora core 14 of bind-9.7.3 and patching. diff -u unpatched/configure.in patched/configure.in --- unpatched/configure.in 2010-07-05 14:02:20.000000000 +0200 +++ patched/configure.in 2010-07-05 14:03:48.000000000 +0200 @@ -282,7 +282,8 @@ AC_C_INLINE AC_C_VOLATILE AC_CHECK_FUNC(sysctlbyname, AC_DEFINE(HAVE_SYSCTLBYNAME))

hello all the people I'd call http://people.redhat.com/ atkac ~ / official member of the team redhat for news of future versions of bind 9.7 for el5 sincerely -- gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:

hello list centos. I installed the packages libp11 and engine_pkcs11 of fedora core 14 on my centos 5.5 to allow me to compile the latest version of bind. this is the only way I found to compile bind 9.7.3. you know another way to compile bind 9.7.3 on centos 5.5 thanks for all your return -- gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7