similar to: Quota Calculation seems to be wrong when using dsync

I have an idea for running a pair of redundant dovecot mail servers that may be odd but it might work. I'm interested in any thoughts on the topic. Would it work to run 'dsync mirror' every minute against either mdbox or sdbox mailbox on a dedicated network connection between two (or potentially three or four) mail servers? I'm trying to avoid using a NAS/SAN or some other

This is a multipart MIME message. --==_Exmh_-19086308140 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In addition to my previous message, here is the source Rd-file that I used in R CMD Rdconv -d --type=Sd plot.mefista.Rd > plot.mefista.d command. --==_Exmh_-19086308140 Content-Type: text/plain ; name="plot.mefista.Rd"; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: plot.mefista.Rd

Computational Aspects of Simulation and Inference for Stochastic Processes and the YUIMA Project This two-day workshop is aimed at presenting the latest results on simulation and inference for stochastic processes and their current and prospect implementation within the YUIMA R package. Dates: March 27 (Tue) 9:15-12:15, 14:45-17:45 March 28 (Wed) 9:15-12:15, 14:45-17:45 Location:

Hi all, I have 2 question. First: I use dovecot (version 2.2.9) with mdbox mail format. When I run dsync tool with "mirror" or "backup" parameters my source and destination directory synchronize correctly but if I delete some messages in user mailbox, deleted messages does not synced to destination. For example : atif at domain.com path is /mail/domain.com/atif/ and its

Hi I enabled quota + warnings in my replication test setup and now whenever a mail gets delivered the quota is counted twice (probably due to both servers using the same mysql quota backend) and quota warnings are fired too early. After a doveadm quota recalc -u <username> the quota is correct again. How do I make dovecot only count the quota on the server where the mail was added

Hi all, I have relatively big data frames (> 10000 rows by 80 columns) that need to be exposed to "merge". Works marvelously well in general, but some fields of the data frames actually contain multiple ";"-separated values encoded as a character string without defined order, which makes the fields not match each other. Example: > frame1[1,1] [1] "some;thing"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The error codes for' doveadm user' should be improved to avoid error handling workarounds when scripting commands: $ doveadm user doveadm user [-a <userdb socket path>] [-x <auth info>] <user mask> [?] $ echo $? 1 $ doveadm user foo userdb lookup: user foo doesn't exist $

> -----Original Message----- > From: William Dunlap > Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 9:16 AM > To: 'johannes_graumann at web.de' > Subject: Re: [R] Efficient passing through big data.frame and > modifying select fields > > > Johannes Graumann johannes_graumann at web.de > > Tue Nov 25 15:16:01 CET 2008 > > > > Hi all, > > > >

?I meet the problem about dsync with ?expunge. The problems is expunged mail would reappear after dsyncing and it is easily to reproduce. ?Environment Settings: - Two servers(serverA, serverB) both enabled plugin "*replication"* - And more detail get by "dovecot -n" show below ?Reproduce flow: ?- ?Run two processes pA and pB both would run in while loop ?- pA?(All behavior is

Interrogating some (of my own) code in another package. >norm.meth <- getMethod("normalize", "MatrixLike") >message("str(norm.meth)") >str(norm.meth) >message("show(norm.meth at .Data)") >show(norm.meth at .Data) Last show() displays this: function (object, ...) { .local <- function (object, method = c("median",

At this point I would just due: formals(body(method)[[2L]]) At some point we need to figure out what to do with this .local() confusion. On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Roebuck,Paul L <PLRoebuck at mdanderson.org> wrote: > I'm attempting to reflect the information for use with corresponding > fields in GUI (in a different package), to provide default values, > argname

Would you please clarify your exact use case? Thanks, Michael On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Roebuck,Paul L <PLRoebuck at mdanderson.org> wrote: > Interrogating some (of my own) code in another package. > > >norm.meth <- getMethod("normalize", "MatrixLike") > >message("str(norm.meth)") > >str(norm.meth) > >

I'm attempting to reflect the information for use with corresponding fields in GUI (in a different package), to provide default values, argname as key for UI label lookups, etc. So I want something much more like the formals of the implementation: { "object", "method": c("median", "vs", "tukey"),

Hi, I'm currently trying to setup remote backups of my emails but i'm running into issues (mdbox format, indexes and storage in the same folder hierarchy). Local backup command: dsync -u "my_user" backup /backups/my_user (1) Recently, I noticed that the local backup takes up twice the size as the original mail location (8gb vs. 4gb). I purged alot of emails from the original

> On 19/03/2020 10:06 Simone Lazzaris <simone.lazzaris at qcom.it> wrote: > > > > In data mercoled? 18 marzo 2020 23:08:27 CET, Alessio Cecchi ha scritto: > > > Ciao Simone, > > > > > > why you want each backend to recalc quota only for its managed users and > > > not run "doveadm quota recalc -A" only one time from a

In data mercoled? 18 marzo 2020 23:08:27 CET, Alessio Cecchi ha scritto: > Ciao Simone, > > why you want each backend to recalc quota only for its managed users and > not run "doveadm quota recalc -A" only one time from a backend tha > recalc quota for all users? > Because the indexes are local to the backends. If I make the recalc from one backend only, that one

Hello, I've set up user quota and domain quota for dict SQL and all seems OK. New mail for user increase the user quota and the domain quota. Deleting email count down user quota and domain quota. But in case of SQL failure, I'm trying to rebuild the user quota and domain quota with doveadm quota recalc. The problem is that the command : 'doveadm quota recalc -u foo at bar'

Hello. Used next version of dovecot: # dovecot --version 20130205 (03a0af22100d+) Quota configuration: plugin { quota = dict:Domain quota:%d:redis:host=127.0.0.1:prefix=domain/ quota_rule = *:storage=0 quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+5%% quota2 = dict:User quota::redis:host=127.0.0.1:prefix=user/ quota2_rule = *:storage=0 quota2_rule2 = Trash:storage=+5%% } Problem:

I'm switching quota backend to redis (from maildir++), so all my current usages are reset. I get that I can do "doveadm quota recalc -A", but it takes forever (and auth processes time out/crash). It would make much more sense to recalc the usage on login if the current usage is unset. Is there no way to do a recalc-quota-on-first-login? Thanks. -- Tom Sommer

Ciao Simone, why you want each backend to recalc quota only for its managed users and not run "doveadm quota recalc -A" only one time from a backend tha recalc quota for all users? Il 10/03/20 11:18, Simone Lazzaris ha scritto: > Hello dovecot! > > I administer a dovecot installation with 30k users. I've got 4 dovecot > directors as frontend and 10 backends. >