similar to: Pigeonhole 0.2.2 - managesieve supports virtual namespaces?

I am running Dovecot 1.2.16 and considering moving up to 2.0.8. I have found <http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.0> but there's not a lot about deploying a 2.0 server alongside an existing 1.2. Any hints on a seamless approach to this, especially one that might allow me to upgrade individual users in place, without moving their maildirs into a new tree and still avoid issues with

Hello Dovecot users, The new Dovecot v2.0.8 release has a few changes that prompted changes in Pigeonhole as well. This means that a new release of Pigeonhole is also necessary, because otherwise things will not compile anymore. Apart from a few rather minor bugfixes, some of which originate in Dovecot, one TODO item has finally been resolved: the reject action uses the LDA mail reject API,

Hello Dovecot users, The new Dovecot v2.0.8 release has a few changes that prompted changes in Pigeonhole as well. This means that a new release of Pigeonhole is also necessary, because otherwise things will not compile anymore. Apart from a few rather minor bugfixes, some of which originate in Dovecot, one TODO item has finally been resolved: the reject action uses the LDA mail reject API,

My dovecot logs revealed a crash in the dovecot/imap process a few days ago. It appears to have dereferenced 0x00000004 in the storage shared lib. Unfortunately, I didn't get a core and I'm not sure how to reproduce it. Dovecot 2.0.8 on linux32. Two questions: 1) How can I be sure I get a core next time? I think it's because I run dovecot/imap under a mail uid and didn't have

Hi all, Following the instructions noted at http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Plugins/Pipe , I am trying to make use of the Pigeonhole sieve pipe plugin to execute an application with custom arguments via my test sieve script: require ["vnd.dovecot.pipe"]; if address :is "to" "test at example.com" { pipe :args [ "first-arg",

Hi Stephan, ManageSieve uses the wrong? service name for the authdb lookup. With dovecot-1.2-managesieve the service name was changed from 'managesieve' to 'sieve'. So I altered my table layout in order to make the query "SELECT userid AS "user", password FROM dovecotpassword('%Ln', '%Ld') WHERE %Ls" work again. When I try to login on the sieve

Hi all, ok, I am running version v2.0.beta6 and the latest pigeonhole build to run managesieve and the sieve delivery filters... I am getting the following response from the managesieve port when connecting : Escape character is '^]'. "IMPLEMENTATION" "Dovecot" "SIEVE" "" "SASL" "PLAIN" "STARTTLS" "VERSION"

On 4/8/2015 8:18 AM, John Perry wrote: > I found the developer's page: > > http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/Projects/dovecot-antispam > That project forked, and there are two versions now. They have subtly different configuration parameters, which trips folks up. See also: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Antispam/ where it mentions: >> Introduction >> >>

I'm seeing a few warnings emitted when building for x86. They're pretty obvious, but if you want the configure options etc, I can provide those. In Dovecot 2.1.2 (I also see some of these in 2.1.1): 1) src/lib-index/mail-cache-fields.c (comparison between two last_used fields) mail-cache-fields.c: In function 'mail_cache_header_fields_read': mail-cache-fields.c:406: warning:

Hello Dovecot users, Due to personal matters I haven't had time to do anything in the last few weeks. Before that I provided some pre-releases and since nobody indicated problems with those, I release them definitively now. I hope the shit storm has blown over, so that I can dedicate more of my time towards Pigeonhole development. The Sieve release involves a large architectural change,

Hello Dovecot users, Due to personal matters I haven't had time to do anything in the last few weeks. Before that I provided some pre-releases and since nobody indicated problems with those, I release them definitively now. I hope the shit storm has blown over, so that I can dedicate more of my time towards Pigeonhole development. The Sieve release involves a large architectural change,

Hi, all When I am using mle.cv(wle), I find a interesting problem: I can't do leave-one-out cross-validation with mle.cv(wle). I will illustrate the problem as following: > xx=matrix(rnorm(20*3),ncol=3) > bb=c(1,2,0) > yy=xx%*%bb+rnorm(20,0,0.001)+0 > summary(mle.cv(yy~xx,split=nrow(xx)-1,monte.carlo=2*nrow(xx),verbose=T), num.max=1)[[1]] mle.cv: dimension of the split subsample

Line 33: #process_count = 1024 Probably you mean process_limit

Hi, I would like to upgrade my server from 1.2.16 with sieve and managesieve to 2.0.8 with pigeonhole. Will I get all functionality I was having before? Should this migration be painless or will it require some additional work? I've read the Upgrading guide so I know I need to create an additional user. I've migrated the mails from Maildir to dbox in the past (using the convert

Hello dovecot users, I have finally updated the MANAGESIEVE patch to fix the currently known small problems with the protocol implementation. Also, I included a proxy implementation based on imap-proxy.c. This patch is designed for dovecot release 1.0.2 and it will not apply cleanly to the 1.1 versions yet. Change Log V5 ------------- - Applied patch by Uldis Pakuls to fix

new Dovecot 2.0.8 installation on Opensuse 11.3 I got the error "lmtp (xxx at mydomain.yy): Error: user xxx at mydomain.yy: Initialization failed: Namespace '': mbox: mbox requires client_limit=1 for service" while trying to transfer mails by lmtp from postfix to dovecot. I googled and looked on the dovecot wiki about this client_limit issue, but no success. What's the syntax

Mail server runs centos 6.9 and so does the nfs servers, it is using nfsv3 on mount, underlining fs is xfs. On 9 October 2017 23:00:42 BST, Tom Talpey <tom at talpey.com> wrote: >What OS are you running doveadm on, and what type of NFS server is >hosting the storage? > >One possibility on (much) older NFS servers is that some of them refuse >to extend a file when setting the

On 11/8/2016 2:24 AM, A.L.E.C wrote: > On 08.11.2016 08:04, The Doctor wrote: > >> In another account, I see lots of white items in RoundCude as if these items are >> hidden from Thunderbird hance blocking the IMAP Client from deleting e-mails. > > I guess these "white items" are messages marked as deleted but not > expunged. It is normal with Thunderbird, it

Hello, Having combed through the changefile from kernel.org it seems to me that policy matching is still not in the 2.6 kernel. Is that a sadly correct statement? Joh

I must be missing something somewhere. I can't get our Samba server to show up when I look in Network Neighborhood under XP. If I type in \\servername\path, it won't find it, however if I use the IP, it works fine. Now, experience tells me that I'm having to type the IP because it's not resolving the name. Well fine, I can fix that, however I don't recall doing that