similar to: Quota warning generated when crossing on both sides

Hi Everyone, I have a question regarding reverse quota_warnings. I'm building a new setup, and I would like to block sending messages if a person is over his/her quota limit. Although this can be accomplished using a quota_warning script, I can't find how to accomplish the reverse. Has anyone tried to do something like this? By looking at the source code: ---- quote ---- if

Hi all, I noticed that in some circumstances quota warnings are ignored. The bug arises when both of the following are used: 1. percentage-based quota warnings, i.e.: quota_warning = storage=1%% quota-warning 1 %u 2. filesystem quota backend (and probably others, except for quotas configured directly in dovecot config) Percentage-based quota warnings have rule.bytes_limit recalculated

On 17.02.2015 20:03, Micha? Gi?y?ski wrote: > > On 21.11.2014 20:04, Grzegorz Nosek wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I noticed that in some circumstances quota warnings are ignored. The >> bug arises when both of the following are used: >> >> 1. percentage-based quota warnings, i.e.: >> >> quota_warning = storage=1%% quota-warning 1 %u >>

On 21.11.2014 20:04, Grzegorz Nosek wrote: > Hi all, > > I noticed that in some circumstances quota warnings are ignored. The > bug arises when both of the following are used: > > 1. percentage-based quota warnings, i.e.: > > quota_warning = storage=1%% quota-warning 1 %u > > 2. filesystem quota backend (and probably others, except for quotas > configured

Hello, We are using dovecot 1.0.8 with LDAP authentication and extra variebles (like quota limit) storage. Since some of our users are asking for warning of quota use I have been playing around with the quota rewrite patch for dovecot 1.0.8 and found that it does not work for us as it is now. I've applied the patch recompiled dovecot reconfigured using the new "quota_warning"

Hi, In our setup, we use two quota roots. One for user quota and one for domain quota. If a user has no quota, then the domain quota is applied. For a user with user quota this is how it looks: # doveadm quota get -u test at shellz.nl Quota name Type Value Limit % Domain quota STORAGE 1439155 2560000 56 Domain quota MESSAGE 21257 - 0 User quota STORAGE 0 102400 0

dovecot v2.2.16 I've found a few bugs in Trash plugin. 1. If Quota set only messages limit (without storage limit) then Trash plugin does not expunge any message because Quota plugin sets too_large_r=TRUE. It's because quota_default_test_alloc function does not check if bytes_limit is set. /* if size is bigger than any limit, then it is bigger than the

Jon Harrop wrote: > Having implemented a GC for HLVM, I am now turning my attention to > implementing a GC that supports parallelism. To do this, I would like to use > atomic instructions as well as mutexes. What is the status of LLVM's atomic > instrinsics (e.g. CAS)? Is anyone using them in real projects? > > I realised that an obvious test would be to compile some

Having implemented a GC for HLVM, I am now turning my attention to implementing a GC that supports parallelism. To do this, I would like to use atomic instructions as well as mutexes. What is the status of LLVM's atomic instrinsics (e.g. CAS)? Is anyone using them in real projects? I realised that an obvious test would be to compile some simple example programs with llvm-g++ instead of

Hello all, We've discovered that VoIP (IAX2) + Citrix + Video is pegging the measly CPU on the Netopia router our ISP provided. We've got 3Mb/3Mb and will increase to 4/4 next year. The Netopia simply breaks out our WAN IPs, and we've got a switch hooked up to it on the inside (Actually I've got a QoS box in-between). ------------- | Internet | | on Cat5 | -------------

Hello, I started monitoring lan traffic with RRDTool on a linux box the other day that runs rsync, and I've found what I would consider a strange traffic pattern. This linux box rsync about 2Gb of data to a local samba share that is connected to a Windows 2003 server. Based on the literal data stat, roughly 20% is changed nightly and uploaded. However, the strange thing is that the traffic

Dear List, I'm trying to get diff/removed data and it's offset out. So I write a functions in receive_data. When I run backup, I found there is a weird behavior which I don't understand. i = recv_token(f_in, &data) will receive (i = -1, offset2 = 0) some where in the middle of the transfer procedure. That's to say, it's going to transfer the first data block from sender,

If I relay through my Cisco 7940/7960, does it do QOS, even with a dumb switch? I know you can set quality/qos but only if you have a layer2/layer3 switch that supports the tagging. A simple little linksys 5 port switch wouldn't know about QOS, it'd give everybody equal priority. If a computer plugged into the phone, and the phone into the dumb 5 port switch and then to the internet,

Hello I am trying to setup dovecot maildir quota, but even though it seems to be working fine, I am still receiving emails into my inbox even though I have exceeded my quota. Here is my dovecot config: plugin { quota = maildir:User Quota quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+100M } And my SQL config file for Dovecot (dovecot-sql.conf): user_query = SELECT '/var/vmail/%d/%n' as home,

Hi all, I recently started with Xen (3.1.0) on my new server running Ubuntu Gutsy (7.10) and I''m experiencing very poor network performance on my domU''s. Since my colo provider offers me a /28 of routed public IPs next to one interconnection IP to their routers, I built a Xen configuration as described in http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/360 (a routed

I now have Dovecot in production and things are apparently trouble-free. The one known problem is that initial client inbox load can take 30 seconds - 2 minutes. For instance: 'I got fed up waiting and went and got coffee'...this with a 3MB mbox inbox...and my mail server is a substantial machine consuming 25% CPU just for this person's IMAP session. I realize that a certain

Hi Guys, Im really hoping someone can help... I have installed Instantrails onto about 50 Tablet PC''s - some HP TC4200''s and some HP TC1100''s. Installation etc isn''t a problem, but i have noticed that when i shutdown Instantrails, it closes, but looking at the task manager it is still listed as a process running in the background- utilizing @ 3MB of memory or

On 24.01.2017 11:31, Tom Sommer wrote: > On 2017-01-24 10:25, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> On 24.01.2017 11:13, Tom Sommer wrote: >>> On 2017-01-18 15:27, mkliewe at gmx.de wrote: >>> >>>> dovecot crashes when I switch the quota tracking from dict to count. >>> >>> I have the same problem, but I use 'dict:file' as quota backend - >>>

Hi, I'm looking for a firewall (preferably on Linux / UNIX) that could automatically block bandwidth abusers as soon as a connection goes over a certain speed, or limit - i.e. either more than say 3Mb/s or 10GB in a giving period (like weekly / monthly). But, I need it to block the IP to, or where the traffic comes from, or goes to. i.e. a user logs into a web server and upload a LOT of

i'm running samba on solaris x86 only for accessing NT shares. samba is not running as a domain master or anything. the problem is that when i try to upload 18mb file to NT share, smbclient crashes. $ smbclient //<box 1>/<share A> added interface ip=x.x.1.30 bcast=x.x.255.255 nmask=255.255.0.0 Domain=[ACCORD] OS=[Windows NT 4.0] Server=[NT LAN Manager 4.0] smb: \> put