similar to: Anaconda Exception when installing Centos SPARC

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Anaconda Exception when installing Centos SPARC"

2006 Sep 25
0
Anaconda Exception when installing CENTOS 4.2Beta for sparc
Hi. I'm trying to install CENTOS 4.2Beta for sparc, and i got this exception: +------------+ Exception Occurred +-------------+ | | | An unhandled exception has occurred. # | | This is most likely a bug. Please copy # | | the full text of this exception and file # | | a detailed bug report against anaconda at # | |
2006 Sep 25
0
Anaconda Exception when installing CENTOS 4.2Beta SPARC
Hi. I'm trying to install CENTOS 4.2Beta for sparc, and i got this exception: +------------+ Exception Occurred +-------------+ | | | An unhandled exception has occurred. # | | This is most likely a bug. Please copy # | | the full text of this exception and file # | | a detailed bug report against anaconda at # | |
2006 Apr 03
1
Anaconda Exeption
I'm intalling CentOS Sparc and after i choose the packages i want to install i get the below exeption: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/anaconda", line 1176 in intf.run (id, dispatch, configFileData) File "/local/builder/tmp/anaconda-10.1.1.25 //usr /lib/anaconda/text.py", line 510, in run Then the installation aborts. WHAT CAN I DO TO SOLVE THE
2005 Dec 06
1
Installation failure
I'm trying to do a very minimal install onto a Soekris net4801. There seems to be a missing dependency in some package causing the install to fail with: +-------------+ Exception Occurred +--------------+ | | | An unhandled exception has occurred. This # | | is most likely a bug. Please copy the
2008 Aug 21
0
kickstart error on 5.2 exception
Hi, I am trying to get my kickstart file that worked under 5.1 to work under 5.2 centos x86_64. This is the error that I get. On the screen it says Exception occured and gives me the option to save it. This is that file. I dont see any odd that would cause it to crash. Can anyone help. My kickstart file is in the mix below. Seems to be related to network, my line seems fine (I think) for
2008 Jun 05
0
a anaconda test problem
I am building a latest CentOS5 and every newest stuff is ready. All are in directory "/linux/CentOS/5-respin/os/x86_64". My OS is CentOS5 too. I want to add some other pictures during installation process, so anaconda adjustment is needed. When I run command "anaconda --test --method=http://192.168.0.3/linux/CentOS/5-respin/os/x86_64", a error message followed: Traceback (most
2008 Feb 14
2
kickstart file problem
I have a kickstart file that I am using to install multiple machines. If I install with no %post script, everything runs great. When I add the following %post section, if fails. I have been working on this for a few days now without luck, Any help would be appreciated. Here is the error, the script follows. Traceback (most recent call first): File
2011 Jul 13
1
PXE booting centos6
Hello I am trying to PXE boot centos6 but i get an error, Seetings are: PXE server is a cobbler centos5 machine trying to boot a centos6 client Traceback (most recent call first): File "<string>", line 64, in __iter__ File "/usr/lib/yum-plugins/whiteout.py", line 46, in postreposetup_hook for event, elem in iterparse(infile): File
2009 Apr 01
6
[Bug 589] New: MARK doesn't work properly with incoming traffic
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=589 Summary: MARK doesn't work properly with incoming traffic Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: i386 OS/Version: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P1 Component: iptables AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org
2004 May 03
1
Install of 3.1 aborts
Hello everybody, yes I did check the installation medium (dvd), so that's not the problem. My system only contains components which are accepted by the redhat hardware compatibiliy list. But anaconda fails, announcing: You are trying to install on a machne which isn't supported by this release of CentOS-3 The error message stems from this part of anaconda code in packages.py: # this
2011 Sep 05
1
linux xfs
Hi, I get the below issue when i install CentOS 5.6 x86_64 on IBM x3650 M3 when i run "linux xfs" at boot prompt. Please suggest/guide. Regards Kaushal 20:14:50 INFO : moving (1) to step confirminstall 20:14:55 INFO : moving (1) to step install 20:14:55 INFO : moving (1) to step enablefilesystems 20:14:55 DEBUG : starting mpaths 20:14:55 DEBUG : self.driveList():
2006 Apr 24
0
network configuration with 2 physical eth cards
hi friends, I have met some problem in the configuration of xen domain U network. I have two physical network cards. eth0 is connected with the outworld and using a dhcp assignment. eth1 is connected wth the local network and i set the ip as 192.168.0.100 I create a Sarge domainU. And i went into the sarge /etc/network/interfaces, modify it as 192.168.0.10 I am
2008 Aug 16
0
kickstart and 5.2 x86_64 giving errors.
When I use my kickstart file (which works on 5.1 x86_64) with 5.2 I get the following error. I put my kickstart file at the end. Do I have something incomaptible in the file? jerry -------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call first): File "/usr/lib/anaconda/network.py", line 341, in lookupHostname ret = isys.pumpNetDevice(dev.get('device'),
2016 Feb 01
1
Re: generate interface MAC addresses in a particular order
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> wrote: > On 29.01.2016 11:24, Andrei Perietanu wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I am using libvirt to manage VM on my system; after creating a VM > (default > > no NICs are present in the configuration) you can add any number of > > interfaces to it (as long as they exist on the host).
2016 Jan 29
2
generate interface MAC addresses in a particular order
Hi all, I am using libvirt to manage VM on my system; after creating a VM (default no NICs are present in the configuration) you can add any number of interfaces to it (as long as they exist on the host). To do that, I edit the configuration xlm: vmXml = self.domain.XMLDesc() root = ET.fromstring(vmXml) devices = root.find('./devices') intf =
2006 May 29
2
sip interopability problem
Hi, I have two asterisk machines side by side both running debian sarge, one running sarge's version of asterisk (1.0.7.dfsg.1-2) and the other running the version of asterisk from www.backports.org (1:1.2.1.dfsg-2bpo1). I also have a SIP provider who is routing blocks of DID's to both machines. The sip.conf is nearly identical on both machines (the general section, and the section
2016 Jan 31
0
Re: generate interface MAC addresses in a particular order
On 29.01.2016 11:24, Andrei Perietanu wrote: > Hi all, > > I am using libvirt to manage VM on my system; after creating a VM (default > no NICs are present in the configuration) you can add any number of > interfaces to it (as long as they exist on the host). > To do that, I edit the configuration xlm: > > vmXml = self.domain.XMLDesc() > root =
2007 Apr 18
0
Anaconda exception: installation media already mounted
I'm trying to install CentOS5 i386 from DVD ISO to my new second SATA drive. I boot from a USB key and tell it to use the DVD image on sda5 (ext3, an FC5 boot partition), installing to a default partition setup on sdb. I tell it to install grub to sda (where my old FC5 grub install lives), with WinXP64 on sda1 as a non-default additional OS. Right after that I get an Anaconda exception
2016 Feb 11
0
ananconda update.img creation fails: generated but with wrong python version in /usr/sbin/anaconda contained
Hi all, I've created an anaconda update.img file per instructions at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Updates for Centos 7.2. The problem is that the update.img file contains references to python3 (say, file /usr/sbin/anaconda), and so the all installation fails immediately. My question is: what are the steps to create an anaconda update image appropriate for a particular centos
2008 Dec 30
3
Anaconda crash during Centos 5.2 installation.
Hi, I'm trying to install Centos 5.2 on an "old" machine in graphical mode (to use LVM) but anaconda crash. I made several tries with various installation resquest (the last is "Server", "Customize after installation") unfortunately, it's reproductible: Traceback (most recent call first): File