similar to: --exec-mail

Once upon a time I could configure my mailer to access my historical archives by running something like ssh $mailserver MAIL=maildir:~/Maildir-archive dovecot --exec-mail imap I need to run /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap manually now, and I've fixed that a while ago for my normal email access. But I've just had cause to go back to my archives for the first time in a while... and realised

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1328 Summary: ControlClient uses wrong $DISPLAY. Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.6p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: dwmw2 at

Quick response to a detail, I'll respond to more of this when i have more time. On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 1:55 PM David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> wrote: > OK... which __x86_indirect_thunk* symbols *are* being used by Clang in > 32-bit mode? __x86_indirect_thunk __x86_indirect_thunk_eax __x86_indirect_thunk_ecx __x86_indirect_thunk_edx > I've added

Aug 18 22:07:31 twosheds IMAP(dwmw2): : Panic: file mail-index-transaction.c: line 637 (mail_index_transaction_lookup): assertion failed: (seq >= t->first_new_seq && seq <= t->last_new_seq) * PREAUTH [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE SORT SORT=DISPLAY THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS MULTIAPPEND UNSELECT IDLE CHILDREN NAMESPACE UIDPLUS

If we''ve abandoned the idea of putting the number of redundant blocks into the top bits of the type bitmask (and I hope we have), then we''re fairly much there. Current code is at: git://, http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/btrfs-raid56.git git://, http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/btrfs-progs-raid56.git We have recovery working, as well as both full-stripe writes

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1329 Summary: stale control sockets prevent connection. Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.6p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: dwmw2 at

I believe I have now fixed the 0x64 0xa1 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 bug in r199364. On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com>wrote: > To fix it we need to change offset8/offset16/etc to have two suboperands > and update the printer to understand that. Also update the disassembler to > add the segment to the MCInst when its creating it. When I did these

On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 22:00 +0000, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 1:55 PM David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> > wrote: > > OK... which __x86_indirect_thunk* symbols *are* being used by Clang > > in > > 32-bit mode? > __x86_indirect_thunk > __x86_indirect_thunk_eax > __x86_indirect_thunk_ecx > __x86_indirect_thunk_edx Thanks.

On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 14:23 -0800, Jim Grosbach wrote: > Hi David, > > AFAIK, the answer is basically “because it’s always been that way.” I > seem to recall there were some things that were different (data layout > string and such), but that could also be parameterized if it hasn’t > been already by the recent refactorings, I suppose. It is *all* now parameterized. The classes

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1482 Summary: SOCKS4A support Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.0p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:23 PM Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:03 PM David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> > wrote: > >> On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 10:10 +0100, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev wrote: >> > >> > I saw the retpoline mitigation landed in r323155. Are we ready to >> > merge this to 6.0, or are

On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 22:59 -0800, Craig Topper wrote: > I started trying to fix this tonight but it's pretty nasty to fix. > I'll try to make another go at it later this week. Much of it seems fixed already; what's left to fix? The segment prefix override? Does that mean we get to fix disassembly of '0x65 0xa4' while we're at it? (Although we can't even

On 02/02/2018 04:27 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:23 PM Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com <mailto:chandlerc at google.com>> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:03 PM David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org <mailto:dwmw2 at infradead.org>> wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 10:10 +0100, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev

Here's a brief update on the current state of 16-bit x86 support... The assembler has support for the .code16 directive and can happily output 16-bit code. In pending patches¹ I have also added an i386-*-*-code16 triple and fixed the disassembler to support 16-bit mode (which was previously present, but could not be invoked and was fairly broken). And added a '-m16' option to clang.

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17377 Summary: NV50 failure on MacBook Pro. Product: xorg Version: git Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy: dwmw2 at

On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 21:55 +0000, David Woodhouse via llvm-dev wrote: > Can you take care of filing the tickets for %V0 and "=q" > and attribute__((indirect_branch("keep"))) please? With those fixed, I > think we should be OK again. Here's %V0 support, which makes the hypervisor guest support build. diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86AsmPrinter.cpp

On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 19:46 +0000, Eric Christopher wrote: > > I'm catching up on email at the moment so I don't know if you've done > this, but patches should go to llvm-commits for review if you wouldn't > mind. I have done so. I've since worked out that the signed 16-bit relocation is probably entirely pointless and I should just drop the assert() from the

On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 10:49:25AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 06:20 +0000, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > I've landed the patch in r324449. > > > > Before we merge this into two different Clang release branches and > > almost immediately release one of them, I would really like someone > > to confirm that this patch works well with the

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1331 Summary: ControlClient escape sequences non-functional Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.6p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: dwmw2

On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 13:47 -0500, Rafael Espíndola wrote: > > Your task, should you choose to accept it, is to make it cope with other > > forms of relaxation where necessary. > > And if not, please open a bug :-) http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22662 FWIW I could reproduce the 'movl foo, %ebx' one but a relative jump *was* using 16 bits (although gas uses 8):