similar to: Problem with dovecot-acl was not solved

I have a problem with dovecot-acl. Some of our users need to use the same Mailbox with all folders: Inbox (with subfolders), Outbox, Send and Deleted, (some users need in full righs, some - readonly) so I choosed Symlinking mailboxes and tried to use dovecot-acl file. cat dovecot-acl: user=t1 lrwsti user=operolegs lrwsti user=operantona lrwsti user=operdss lr User operdss have lrwsti rights in

Dear All, I am trying to create a empty structure that I want to fill gradually through the code. I want to use something like rbind to create the basic structure first. I am looking for a possibility to do an rbind where the columns names dont match fully (but the missing columns can be defaulted to either zero or n/a) (my actual data has a lot of columns). Please see the data frames below I

On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 16:23 -0700, Ray Klassen via samba wrote: > On 2018-09-12 09:44 AM, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 09:30:19AM -0700, Ray Klassen via samba > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > and from the what the hell department. I did it. Comparing > > > > > >

Hi Tom, Matt, I'm running into strange issues with the cos test (piglit generated_tests/cl/builtin/math/builtin-float-cos-1.0.generated.c) I have been seeing random failures (incorrect results) for some time and tried to investigate. the weird part is that the failures are not 100% reproducible, sometimes the tests pass, or partly pass (it's usually float8 and float16 subtests that

I am migrating a couple old RH servers running sendmail and UW-IMAP to a new Ubuntu 10.04 servers running Postfix and Dovecot. I have everything working reasonably well except that the permissions of newly created mbox mail folders is always 600. I have reviewed the archives, google, and double checked everything is as suggested in the Dovecot Wiki / SharedMailboxes / Permissions. I am

http://dovecot.org/test/ Just mbox fixes since 1.0-test16. The logic is simpler and more correct now. Can anyone break it anymore? I actually tested it a while with Evolution and several mailboxes and it didn't break at least immediately. :) Now maybe a few more days and I dare trying this thing myself with my real mboxes (yes, I'm still using them). Dovecot mailing list archives could

dovecot-2.2.28-1.el6_31.wing.x86_64 I've created this public shared namespace with namespace public2 { type = public separator = . prefix = Public2. location = maildir:/mail/public2:INDEX=/mail/%u/public:LAYOUT=fs:DIRNAME=.store subscriptions = no } and I'm using the "imap_client_workarounds = tb-extra-mailbox-sep" and filesystem structure listed at the end. The

Could someone verify if 1) sieve can fileinto shared public mbox? 2) if it can, what I might be doing wrong? I am getting errors in the log when I try to have sieve fileinto a shared public mbox. 11/04/10 06:08:12 pm n3 dovecot deliver(tarts): sieve: msgid=<201011050108.oA5187sm003711 at JaySmith.com>: failed to store into mailbox 'public/SPAM/SPAMMM': Mailbox

Hi! I am using Unix groups to control access to shared mailboxes. This works fine as long as files are not moved between mailboxes that are owned by different groups. The move operation doesn't change group ownership of the mail. Is there a way to force dovecot to e.g. inherit the ownership from the parent folder, not only for new messages bot also for messages moved from one folder to

On 10/12/2015 12:20 PM, Stefan Kania wrote: > Hello, > > when I check ACLs on my sysvol I got the following errors: > > root at DKHHDC1:~# samba-tool gpo aclcheck > ERROR(<type 'exceptions.KeyError'>): uncaught exception - 'No such > element' > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", > line 175, in _run >

Hi. I subscripted just now to the mailing list, but I've been using a Samba file server (PDC) on Debian for about 2.5 years now. Users are almost all WinXP SP3. No users are complaining but since I changed everything to one share with group permission on underlying directories I see a lot of errors in log.smbd. Anyone knows what the log message exactly means? I guess it has something to

I seem to be having a bit of a brain fade with regard to permissions in samba. I have a share with several folders owned by different groups: drwxrws--- 13 root accounts 4.0K Jun 7 12:12 Accounts drwxrws--- 16 ian accounts 4.0K Jun 7 11:24 Administration drwxrws--- 14 accounts users 4.0K Apr 22 12:05 Downloads drwxrwsr-x 7 ian users 4.0K Mar 22 13:51

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 13.10.2015 um 11:20 schrieb Stefan Kania: > Am 12.10.2015 um 18:47 schrieb James: >> On 10/12/2015 12:20 PM, Stefan Kania wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> when I check ACLs on my sysvol I got the following errors: >>> >>> root at DKHHDC1:~# samba-tool gpo aclcheck ERROR(<type >>>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, when I check ACLs on my sysvol I got the following errors: root at DKHHDC1:~# samba-tool gpo aclcheck ERROR(<type 'exceptions.KeyError'>): uncaught exception - 'No such element' File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 175, in _run return self.run(*args, **kwargs) File

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 12.10.2015 um 18:47 schrieb James: > On 10/12/2015 12:20 PM, Stefan Kania wrote: >> Hello, >> >> when I check ACLs on my sysvol I got the following errors: >> >> root at DKHHDC1:~# samba-tool gpo aclcheck ERROR(<type >> 'exceptions.KeyError'>): uncaught exception - 'No such element'

I can't seem to get a shared folder working properly. I am authenticating using pam, and the users have a shell account on the system. Problem is, the permissions on the messages moved into the folder don't maintain properly, and other users can't read the share. I have the following in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf namespace public { separator = / prefix = Public/ location =

Hi, I have a problem with my Samba/WinBIND implementation. In folders shared by multiple people the last one to access and modify a file takes ownership of the file and changes the permissions so other users cannot make changes to the same file: [root@atlas PLANNING RECORDS]# cd REGIONAL\ 1\ AIRLINE\ DOCS/ [root@atlas REGIONAL 1 AIRLINE DOCS]# ls -al total 1232 drwxrws---+ 8 root

Hi John, this is my smb.conf-file: # /usr/local/etc/smb.conf # # $Id: smb.conf,v 1.1 2002/11/28 17:53:45 root Exp $ # [global] workgroup = ossa6 netbios name = claire server string = File-services on claire. hosts allow = 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 max log size = 0 security = user encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /usr/local/etc/smbpasswd socket options = TCP_NODELAY interfaces =

On 08/11/15 11:53, Michael Adam wrote: > On 2015-11-08 at 11:14 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 08/11/15 10:49, Michael Adam wrote: >>> On 2015-11-08 at 09:29 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>> On 07/11/15 23:28, Michael Adam wrote: >>>>> rsync will work if not using --numeric-ids. >>>> OK, I know that logins will work on all the samba

The handling of permissions in rsync (2.5.2) is nasty or broken. (tested platforms: Linux 2.4.x and Solaris 7) We have a directory which should only accessible to a group of users (test) : [sn@noname test]$ ls -lda /home/test drwxrws--- 2 root test 4096 Feb 13 15:44 /home/test Every user has an umask of 007 and his/her own default group: [sn@noname sn]$ id uid=500(sn)