similar to: Migrate from RHAS 4 to CentOS 4.2

Hi folks: I've recently migrated one of my production servers (bad Jason!) from WBEL to CentOS 3.3 using Donavan's instructions in the FAQ (http://www.centos.org/modules/smartfaq/faq.php?faqid=19). While it was as painless as the document suggests, I've run into problems with postgrey (a postfix greylisting daemon) on my server. Whenever I try to start postgrey, I get the

I'm trying to get dovecot working with various clients on my new mailserver. I installed the base rc2 that comes with OpenBSD 4.0, then upgraded to rc14 when I ran into problems with TLS and Thunderbird. The server has no problems with Mail.app on my laptop, but any connection attempts from Thunderbird timeout after the TCP handshake. 13:53:41.074438 66.x.x.2.50483 >

Hi all- I have a Centos 3.6 server in production that hadn't been rebooted in quite some time. I was finally onsite today and took the chance to reboot into the most current kernel, but the box hung while "stopping iptables". Some Googling led me to one or two reports of systems hanging while the iptables initscript unloaded the modules. Has anyone else encountered this?

I'm attempting to upgrade to kernel-smp-2.4.21-27.0.4.EL (x86_64) on a Dell 1850. The new kernel is panicing on reboot. When comparing against the current working kernel, I just noticed that we're currently running the "UP" kernel: [root at polaris root]# uname -srvp Linux 2.4.21-27.0.2.EL #1 SMP Wed Jan 19 11:49:43 CST 2005 x86_64 First question... why is the kernel

Hi all, Does anybody have experience with updating a wbel4 box to centos4? I assume I can follow the basic faq19 instructions, but that's an assumption. Thanks in advance Brad

Hello several months ago I install WhiteBox Linux on several severs, I was happy, not woriing about upgrading every 1,5 year as when I use RH 4.0, 6.0, 7.3, 9.0 .... And then WhiteBox went black, WBEL updates release slowed down and maintainer wont help form anybody. Just telling "If you want quick updates, build it yourself.". I prefer wasting time for customizations and/or

Running CentOS 3.4, I enabled the ntpd service and noticed that it opens up a hole in the firewall for ntp from 127.127.1.0. I look in the ntpd initscript and see that it's reading in servers from /etc/ntp/step-tickers. However, that file is empty... /etc/ntp/ntpservers contains clock.redhat.com and clock2.redhat.com, but ntpservers isn't used *anywhere*. This looks like a bug, but

I am having this error Im using apache 2.0.46 with tomcat 5.5.4 .. Mod_jk is working fine. But my GSM modem is having problem in connecting.. RXTX fhs_lock() Error: creating lock file: /var/lock/LCK..ttyS0: File exists Any help will be great. Vaneet Vaneet Sharma executive manager iDeasTank Limited an iwg business dolphins' court po 388 valletta, m-malta/europe mobile: +356 9943 8263

Hi This is not a RHEL list but i am sure someone here knows the answer :) I downloaded the wrong ISO's from RH and installed RHAS when i really wanted RHES - I know there is little (no) difference between the 2 but what do i need to do to 'convert' a RHAS box to RHEL ? thanks

Hey all, I am looking to get some input regarding inexpensive dedicated servers -- preferably with a hosting company the offers CentOS as an OS option. Does anybody have any input or recommendations? I'd really like to support a company that uses CentOS. And there are _so many options out there, is kind of overwhelming. Thanks, Ryan

Hello I am leaving Whitebox because of lack of up to date sec. updates. Did any body try to "upgrade" WBEL to CentOS? Any dificulty or problems? Thanks Petr Klima

I'm trying to install ocfs on a Redhat 2.1 AS, uniprocessor, kernel 2.4.18-e.40, and I'm receiving the following error message when I try to install ocfs-support-1.0.9-12.i686.rpm: Checking fir Red Hat enterprise kernel: [FAILED] error: execution of %post scriptlet from ocfs-support-1.0.9-12, exit status 1 i've already installed those packages that are required for ocfs:

What is the current state of Xen ia64 on SGI Altix? I see some Altix patches from sgi.com, I assume this means it is tested. Is it stable? Are there more appropriate mailing lists or documentation to query? Thankyou, Tim _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi, For a few months i've been using WhiteBox Enterprise Linux. In fact, i've migrated all my companie's servers (about 20) to this RHEL distro like. Well, it's not that i'm not satisfied, but WBEL is a one man show and that causes me some preocupation. And besides, it seems to me that it can't stand up to the rythm RHEL evolves. That's why i'm writing to you,

Hi All, I am looking for information on when CentOS 5 will be available for IA64. I found this forum posting but no responses http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=8714&forum=45 I am looking to perform a large migration of about 500 workstations from various Suse and Red Hat versions to CentOS to standardize some what. Because I have to support x86 (32 & 64) and

On 04/01/2015 08:12 PM, Always Learning wrote: > 1. What is the logically reason for this alleged "improvement" ? I never said it was an improvement. I just said that I didn't think it was that big of a deal, and it boggles my mind that people are calling a change of an ISO's file name 'unwise' and even comparing it to a Microsoft move. I just don't see it as

Recent convert from WhiteBox, a few questions What is the difference between CentOS 4.2 and "4"? Is this like the Whitebox "respin"? Are updates/packages for 4.2 applicable across all the "4" series of releases? -Ben -- "The best way to predict the future is to invent it." - XEROX PARC slogan, circa 1978

Cant seem to fix this problem, need help --- Tue Mar 30 11:21:17 +0000 2010 //yumconf/File[/etc/hosts] (debug): Creating checksum {md5}0eea71665fb6890c06421fd13aa3f849 Tue Mar 30 11:21:17 +0000 2010 //yumconf/File[/etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo]/checksum (debug): Initializing checksum hash Tue Mar 30 11:21:17 +0000 2010 //yumconf/File[/etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo] (debug): Creating

Do you have a timeline when the OCFS 1.0.14-1 will be available on RHAS 2.1 Itanium 64 platform? Or is there going to be one? We notice that OCFS 1.0.14-1 has been available for RHAS 2.1 32 bit for quite a while. Thanks. Michael Zheng Sr. Database Administrator Halliburton IT Operations, America (281) 575-4031 (office); (281) 660-7371 (cellular)

Well, I've downloaded the kernel source code from http://mirror.dulug.duke.edu/pub/redhat/linux/updates/enterprise/2.1AS/en/os /SRPMS/kernel-2.4.18-e.40.src.rpm and compiled it for x86 (i686). Is this kernel compatible with ocfs ?? __________________________________________ Mauro Staretz - MI Montreal Inform?tica Ltda Microsoft MCSE+I / MCDBA / MCP - Oracle OCP Tel: 55-21-2291-6116 R.2104