similar to: 2.0.3 doesn't start without SSL

Hi, On 05/04/15 10:59, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 28 Apr 2015, at 23:49, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> imapc does a lot of UID FETCH $UID (BODY.PEEK[]), which is nice, because it works even with the dumbest IMAP server, altough it really kills performance, especially on high latency lines. >> >> I wonder: if IMAP servers can effectively

On 09/11/2017 10:42 AM, Sami Ketola wrote: >> On 11 Sep 2017, at 11.24, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >> I use dovecot with a broken IMAP server (which doesn't properly implement command pipelining amongst others) as an imapc backend. >> Dovecot issues the above command sequence (SELECT and UID FETCH pipelined), which doesn't work with this server. >>

On 09/11/2017 11:14 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > On 11.09.2017 11:59, Nagy, Attila wrote: >> On 09/11/2017 10:42 AM, Sami Ketola wrote: >>>> On 11 Sep 2017, at 11.24, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >>>> I use dovecot with a broken IMAP server (which doesn't properly >>>> implement command pipelining amongst others) as an imapc backend.

On 08 Feb 2016, at 12:56, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: > > On 02/08/16 11:16, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> Oh, you were thinking about ability to provide IMAP/etc support for other random servers, and have Dovecot act as kind of a middleware and translate the requests. Maybe the answer is still jmap though? It would require jmap lib-storage backend similar to imapc, which

On 09/11/2017 09:17 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > On 08.09.2017 15:29, Nagy, Attila wrote: >> On 09/08/2017 01:53 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: >>> On 08.09.2017 14:50, Nagy, Attila wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I've a broken IMAP server, which doesn't support pipelining and fails >>>> on dovecot's attempt to do this ([C] is

> On 08 Feb 2016, at 11:59, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > > On 08 Feb 2016, at 11:01, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Nearly every popular programming language has an LMTP/POP/IMAP implementation, most of them suck in many different ways. >> I don't know any server or library which provides a well-established,

Hi, This is a capture from an imapc client session (which is triggered by a message, received via LMTP): * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 NAMESPACE] Ready 2 LOGIN "uid" "pass" 2 OK LOGIN succeeded 1 LIST "" "" * LIST (\Noselect) "/" "" 1 OK LIST completed 3 APPEND "INBOX" {568} + Ready for 568 octets of data [...] 3 OK APPEND

Hi, imapc does a lot of UID FETCH $UID (BODY.PEEK[]), which is nice, because it works even with the dumbest IMAP server, altough it really kills performance, especially on high latency lines. I wonder: if IMAP servers can effectively handle boundless fetches (like a list with all wanted UIDs, or simply 1:* if all are needed), do you see this as a good addition to develop? This could be a

Hi, Nearly every popular programming language has an LMTP/POP/IMAP implementation, most of them suck in many different ways. I don't know any server or library which provides a well-established, compatible protocol frontend with an open backend API, which could be used to easily make a custom storage backend for the LMTP/POP/IMAP frontend in any language, in any programming paradigm,

Hello, I'm wondering about closing some information leaks in FreeBSD jails from the "outside world". Not that critical (depends on the application), but a simple user, with restricted devfs in the jail (devfsrules_jail for example from /etc/defaults/devfs.rules) can figure out the following: - network interfaces related data, via ifconfig, which contains everything, but the

Hello, I have some jails running on ZFS, so I have to mount devfs's into them. For this purpose, I have some similar lines in /etc/fstab: devfs /pool/jail/ldap/dev devfs rw 0 0 Where /pool is a ZFS filesystem. This has worked until today -when I upgraded from a previous 7-STABLE (FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #16: Fri Mar 7 14:30:08 CET 2008) to today's STABLE- but not

Hi. Is there a 802.1x implementation (client and server) for FreeBSD -STABLE? Sam -- Samuel Tardieu -- sam@rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/sam

Hi, IP traffic from one jail to another jail, arrives on destination jail on lo0 having the destination jails IP as source IP. Why not the source jail's IP address? How can I filter traffic from one jail to another, using ipfw of ipf? Cheers, -- Anders.

Hi, Non-standard fields are mentioned here: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir and they are stated as currently not used. Questions: - am I right that if they will be used, they will be key=value pairs, like fields in the base filename? Like: 1035478339.27041_118.foo.org,S=1000,W=1030:2,S,X=12,A=something - or are they supposed to be flags, like:

Hi, I have the following config in dovecot 2.2.18: # doveconf -n userdb passdb userdb { driver = prefetch } passdb { args = host=127.0.0.1 port=1430 default_fields = userdb_imapc_user=%u userdb_imapc_password=%w driver = imap } I guess it should cause a single login to the backend IMAP server when issuing a LOGIN to dovecot. Yet, dovecot opens two TCP sessions. In the first, it

Hi, I'm trying to migrate from the deprecated autocreate plugin to the mailbox { auto }setting without success. What do I forget, or misunderstand? I deliver mails via LMTP and log in on IMAP, neither of them create the folders other than the inbox itself. # doveconf -n # 2.2.2: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE amd64 auth_cache_negative_ttl = 0 auth_cache_size

On 09/08/2017 01:53 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > On 08.09.2017 14:50, Nagy, Attila wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've a broken IMAP server, which doesn't support pipelining and fails >> on dovecot's attempt to do this ([C] is dovecot's imapc, [S] is the >> IMAP server): >> >> [C] 24 LOGIN "user" "pass" >> [S] 23 OK

On 09/23/2016 08:05 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 29.07.2016 15:35, Nagy, Attila wrote: >> I use pass and userdb with dict protocol in a similar way: >> >> key passdb { >> key = passdb^MAuth-User: %u^MAuth-Pass: %w^MAuth-Protocol: >> %s^MClient-IP: %r >> format = json >> } >> >> (^M is an \r character, inserted with vi CTRL-v + enter)

On 09/11/2017 03:01 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 11.09.2017 15:56, Nagy, Attila wrote: >> On 09/11/2017 12:12 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: >>> Is there some reason you can't use normal proxy instead of imap backend? >>> That is,return proxy, host=imap_backend, port=1430? There seems to be no >>> pipeline setting currently for imapc in v2.2. >>> >> Yes,

On 04 May 2015, at 16:59, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 05/04/15 10:59, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> On 28 Apr 2015, at 23:49, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> imapc does a lot of UID FETCH $UID (BODY.PEEK[]), which is nice, because it works even with the dumbest IMAP server, altough it really kills