similar to: mbox vs maildir

Hello Actually we use MBOX format for all our IMAP access but users complain they cannot create subfolders in imap folders, of course they cannot because of MBOX format ... I need gurus advices on changing mailbox format Maildir of Dbox ? What would be the safest way to go ? Note : we extensively use Thunderbird here. Thanks

Hello, Thank you, yes I have, it's not answering my questions. Thanks. Dave. On 5/28/19, Ralph Seichter via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > * David Mehler: > >> Are there any performance or stability advantages Sdbox over Maildir? > > Have you read the documentation at all? > > -Ralph >

The parameters listed for nfs installations (mmap_disable, doctlock_use_excl, mail_nfs_storage, mail_nfs_index) - are they necessary for data integrity, and/or do they compensate for NFS latency and improve performance? My understanding is the indexes are a critical part of a dbox storage, but on the other hand having local indexes is a major performance consideration. Is maildir a

On 29.5.2019 8.17, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote: > Are you sure you read > it??https://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox?seems pretty clear. > > --? > This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. David, in particular, is there some question you feel that the wiki fails to answer? Aki

It works ! It was THAT easy ! Can you suggest how to replace the hair I pulled out ? :-) On 2016-12-29 5:27 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote: > login_access_sockets = tcpwrap > > service tcpwrap { > unix_listener login/tcpwrap { > group = $default_login_user > mode = 0600 > user = $default_login_user > } > } > > > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at

Hi, I originally picked mdbox because I had the impression from reading about it on the mailing list that it was more performant and that it would conserve disc space. But lately i found mailboxes have nearly double the storage as reported. I mean, IMAP QUOTA reports around 900MB for one account that has over 2GB when I inspect the mail location of the user using the linux command `du`

Hello. I'm install latest dovecot 1.2 from hg repo. I have many messages in maildir+ format. I migrate some folders to dbxo format using instructions from http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox. But in two folders i'm delete index.cache and index.log files, this is my mistake. Is that possible to recover this files (regenerate) or use my messages from maildir with dbox? Thank You for

Hello, I've some trouble with my kmail (Version 1.13.5 / KDE 4.5.1, Kubuntu 10.04 and a dovecot-imap-server on debian etch (dovecot 1.0.rc15-2etch5). Everytime I try to create a folder under my imap-inbox, I get an error like "can't upload folder...", but after this message I can see a new folder under my inbox-folder, but I can't use it ... With a thundermail-client I

Hi again, I'm still trying to find out if anyone knows the correct way to either switch the existing Maildir multiple file format to the single file format I believe known as MBox. Failing that, though it'll mean a LOT of work for me to manually convert all of the existing Maildirs, how do I get dovecot to work in future in MBox single file format. I tried

I wonder if anyone has tried using an IMAP server with Amazon S3 as a backend. There would be many factors to consider (speed, etc). However, moreso, I don't know that Maildir(++) would support multiple folders that might be linked into the cloud. For example, higher-I/O local incoming mail is on disk, some folders archived on S3. Could be easily done by simply creating another

Hi, >> I have a fedora21 install with dovecot-2.2.18, and when creating a new >> subfolder with thunderbird, the actual folder name is >> "Folder1^Folder2" with a carat as a separator, instead of creating >> Folder2 in the Folder1 directory. >> >> Is this a thunderbird problem? I don't recall having this problem >> prior to upgrading to

On 2015-03-02 2:02 AM, Jochen Bern wrote: > On 03/01/2015 08:53 AM, Jim Pazarena wrote: >> I wonder if there is an easy way to provide dovecot a flat text file of >> ipv4 #'s which should be ignored or dropped? >> >> I have accumulated 45,000+ IPs which routinely try dictionary and >> 12345678 password attempts. The file is too big to create firewall >>

I was thinking about documentation for alternate storage. We have a few mentions at: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Tools/Doveadm http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Tools/Doveadm/Altmove But I was thinking it would be helpful if there could be a page about alternate storage. I could write the page, but I currently have so many unknowns that I think it would be

V2 of dovecot has had the following releases (to recap) 2.0.0 2010-08-16 2.0.1 2010-08-24 2.0.2 2010-09-08 2.0.3 2010-09-17 2.0.4 2010-09-26 2.0.5 2010-10-01 I am on FreeBSD, and the port committers want to wait till dovecot V2 "stabilizes" prior to adding it to the FreeBSD ports base. So, my question is, respectfully, is dovecot V2.0.5 stable enough for prime-time on a busy ISP

I have compiled dovecot2 for FreeBSD with the tcpwrap option. A tcpwrap binary gets built and resides in the FreeBSD directory /usr/local/libexec/dovecot an examination of the compiled options (using the FreeBSD pkg install dovecot2) confirms: LIBWRAP : on yet, when I adjust dovecot.conf with: login_access_sockets = tcpwrap I get the following logged error message: 20161229 17:02:49

Is there any way to convert Dovecot's mdbox/dbox to mbox, MailDir or eml format (or any other easy to import format)? Thanks, Adam -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20190618/37b21f7e/attachment-0001.html>

@lbutlr via dovecot skrev den 2019-06-18 23:06: > On 18 Jun 2019, at 14:32, Adam Raszkiewicz via dovecot > <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >> Is there any way to convert Dovecot's mdbox/dbox to mbox, MailDir or >> eml format (or any other easy to import format)? > > https://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration/MailFormat page error python update that failed ?

Hi, I wonder if there will be a 3rd and 4th disk (additional Packages) to 4.8-Release ... or won't there like in 5.0-Release. Thanks! Zheyu -- +++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++ Bitte l?cheln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!

The Dovecot wiki [1] doesn't list either Exim, Postfix or anything else as supporting the dbox. I did some searching in the Exim archives and have found only one message mentioning dbox, sdbox or mdbox. [2] I think an RFC would go a long way towards getting the format supported. Has Timo, or anyone else, considered submitting an RFC to the IETF? My question was how are we going to use it

Hi, currently most people store their messages in some sort of folder hierarchy, so that they can find them later easily. Here, for example, mails that are connected to a project are being stored in /CompanyName/ProjectNumber folders. Now I was wondering if there is any reason against using tags instead of a folder hierarchy, because tags are better when it comes to mails that belong to