similar to: v2.0.3 released

We're running Dovecot 2.0.2 and sometimes a user creates several imap- prozesses, all of them hanging with the UID-command, using 100% of the CPU resources: root at mail:~# ps ax | grep UID 8005 ? R 266:52 dovecot/imap [user at example.com 192.168.5.5 UID] 10342 ? R 250:33 dovecot/imap [user at example.com 192.168.5.5 UID] 10539 ? R 248:28 dovecot/imap [user at example.com

Hi Chris, I've properly started looking into this yesterday. NSD definitely shouldn't crash, still working on that. However, the provided zone is invalid too(?) I'm not the foremost expert on NSEC3 (or even DNSSEC), but is seems an NSEC3 is missing for bar.foo.com. Empty non-terminals should still have an NSEC3 RR. (Of course, the delegation point should be at bar.foo.com. too and

Hi everybody, We use a Dovecot setup with GlusterFS. Dovecot 1.1.2 and GlusterFS 1.3.9. I enabled the following options (I don't have posix-locks translators): lock_method = dotlock dotlock_use_excl = no mmap_disable = yes mail_nfs_index = yes mail_nfs_storage = yes I receive the following error message. Aug 7 09:38:51 mta2 dovecot: POP3(somebody at domain.tld): nfs_flush_fcntl:

Hi Chris, I can reproduce with your zone. Thanks! Best, Jeroen On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 14:07 +0000, Chris LaVallee wrote: > > Hi Jeroen, > > > Attached is the zone I used. Did you add the record for a.bar ? > > > Ex: > > > a.bar ? 300 ? ? IN ?NS ? ? ?ns.somewhere.net. > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > >

Hi Sagar, Are you getting a particular error? Because the same method should work just fine in NSD. Simply open the corresponding zone file (as configured in nsd.conf) and put that line in there. Best regards, Jeroen Koekkoek On Fri, 2023-07-21 at 09:14 +0200, Sagar Acharya via nsd-users wrote: > How do I add SRV record to my zone file? > > Eg. In pdns I have > >

Jeroen Koekkoek via nsd-users <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> wrote: > Anand's answer is entirely correct. > > Once 4.8.0 is released, zone files will be written once per hour by > default. I'm confused now :-) Arnand said the "database" option is being removed. Does this mean the database will always be created, or NEVER be created? I always wondered why

Hi - I'm getting timouts trying to access us1.samba.org or I'd look through the archives first. Anyone currently supporting any versions of Rational's ClearCase/samba/UNIX/NT? We are currently running samba v2.0.3 on both HP-UX 11.0 (vob server) and Solaris 2.5.1 (view server). Rational ClearCase v3.2.1 on the two UNIX and NT Workstation 4 (some SP3, some SP4) We currently support

Hi, I've installed dovecot v2.0.13 from binary files.dovecote starts ok,but I get some errors in /var/run/mail.log : dovecot: anvil: Fatal: Error reading configuration: read(/var/run/dovecot/config) failed: EOF dovecot: master: Error: service(anvil): command startup failed, throttling dovecot: master: Error: service(config): child 8606 killed with signal 11 (core dumps disabled) dovecot:

Am 23.07.24 um 17:28 schrieb Jeroen Koekkoek via nsd-users: > NSD 4.10.1rc2 pre-release is available: no compile time warnings while building on debian bookworm/x86_64 > @bilias implemented mutual TLS authentication for zone transfers. > Please consult the nsd.conf manual for details on the newly introduced > configuration options tls-auth-port and tls-auth-xfr-only. this is an nice

Hi Jeroen, I just realised that the version I use is very old -- 4.1. So first what I should do -- updating it and only then come here , asking for clarification. ??, 27 ????. 2024??. ? 14:19, Jeroen Koekkoek <jeroen at nlnetlabs.nl>: > Hi Peter, > > NSD processes updates in batches. xfrd receives the [AI]XFR and > schedules a reload for the main process, which in turn forks

On 17/07/2024 16:57, Jeroen Koekkoek wrote: Hi Jeroen, > That is indeed correct. At runtime the CPUID instruction is used to > detect which extensions are offered and it chooses based on that. When > compiling on x86_64 with SSE4.2 and AVX2 enabled, the binary will > actually contain 3 parsers, the most optimal one is used at runtime. Thanks for this clarification. NSD doesn't

Hi Jeroen, Attached is the zone I used. Did you add the record for a.bar ? Ex: a.bar 300 IN NS ns.somewhere.net. Chris ________________________________ From: Jeroen Koekkoek <jeroen at nlnetlabs.nl> Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2024 5:33 AM To: Chris LaVallee <clavallee at edg.io>; nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> Subject: Re:

Hi - I've seen some notes on nut-upsdev, and I also saw patch 302111. Is this patch included in v2.0.2? I've had no luck getting the newhidups driver to detect my Belkin. I'm using Fedora Core 4 and my Belkin is F6B750-AVR. Thanks! "If happiness is having what you want, want what you have." - Bhudda __________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! -

http://dovecot.org/nightly/dovecot-latest.tar.gz Would be nice to get some testing before the actual release. I've now finally gone through all the "TODO" mails in this list and my INBOX and fixed pretty much every problem I know of. There are still some mbox bugs, but I can't really get them fixed unless someone figures out how to reproduce them

Hi I have "problem" with dovect 2.2.13 from repo debian8 and I don't know how to solve it ... Server is a virtual (kvm) with debian 8.11 (postfix + dovecot from repo) and storage is mounting via nfs (I have use only one dovecot with external storage) All works fine but sometime ( after a few hours ) I have got a problem with dovecot cache (i use indexes) logs ->

Hi Thanx for replay. Log: http://paste.debian.net/1117077/ On 20.11.2019 10:07, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Firstly, 2.2.13 is about 5 years old. So there's that. It would be > helpful if you can reproduce this with 2.2.36. > > Also, you forgot to actually include in your log snippet the panic. So > maybe few more lines before the Raw backtrace? > > Aki > > On 20.11.2019

Hi, I'm using dovecot 2.1.7 on debian Squeeze with ldap integration. Almost everything is working fine and I would link to thank all developers for this amazing piece of software. But after changing my qmail-ldap to do LDA integration get all the benefits from LDA and sieve, some emails return with failure like this: <sar at mondialline.com.br>: lda(sar): Fatal: Unknown argument: sar

Hi all, I'm seeing Dovecot include the string "MISSING_DOMAIN" in fetch envelope requests when an mailbox's `addr-spec` part does not have a `domain` part. For example: > C: a022 uid fetch 40 (envelope rfc822.header) > S: * 5 FETCH (UID 40 ENVELOPE ("Sat, 15 Aug 2020 12:53:05 +1000" > "test {{name}}" (("Michael Gratton" NIL

Hello list, Dovecot Version: 2.2.34 (874deae) on FreeBSD MTA: Postfix 3.3.0 I've got an issue with the quota-status service: Something breaks when receiving mail with a recipient address that includes non-lowercase characters, for example foo at Example.com instead of foo at example.com: postfix log: postfix/smtp/smtpd[83387]: NOQUEUE: reject_warning: RCPT from

I have a situation where my LMTP RCPT TO: goes to a mailbox user account that does not reflect either the final (through aliasing) or envelope email address. SMTP RCPT TO: (envelope-local-part at envelope-domain) Final Recipient: (final-local-part at final-domain) LMTP RCPT TO: (mailbox-local-part at mailbox-domain) I'd like to use the final recipient as the vacation address, but also