similar to: getdents() with 4KB buffer - seems slow (Maildir, large inbox)

Hi, is anyone working on Xapian bindings for Go? SWIG supports Go since version 2.0 (http://www.swig.org/Doc2.0/Go.html), but there's some Go-specific code that needs to be written. Unfortunately, I have 0 experience both with SWIG and hacking on the Xapian bindings, so I probably cannot do this as a weekend project. It would come in very handy though. Regards, Marinos

This is my test case, what am I doing wrong? It seems that the API is used incorrectly, but I cannot find the problem... --- 8< --- #!/usr/bin/perl use Search::Xapian qw(:all); use strict; my $xa = new Search::Xapian::WritableDatabase ("/tmp/xapian", DB_CREATE_OR_OVERWRITE); my $indexer = Search::Xapian::TermGenerator->new();

Hi, we've been using Xapian in production for several months now and update our (chert) databases continuously. A freshly generated index occupies only around ~35% of the disk space compared to what it becomes after a few days. This is not a huge concern (we use SSDs), but I've been wondering whether there is a way to fine-tune this (other than recreating the index frequently), so

I am using BM25 with k1=0 and min_normlen=1 to get weights unaffected by document length and term frequency in the document (min_normlen=1 isn't necessary I guess) and am expecting single-term weights to be identical for all matches. I have added a document value to steer such general search queries and it works fine, except that for some search terms, I get results like:

Probably an uncaught malformed query - the following form of search queries causes a crash for me (core 1.2.3, Perl API, 64bit Debian Lenny, self-compiled): x-y NEAR test NEAR test The first term can be anything with a hyphen in it but word characters at the beginning and end ("3--3" will do). The other 2 terms can be anything. "test NEAR x-y NEAR test" will not cause a

Hubert Gr?nheidt wrote: > Maybe it'll help to be more precise: > We have currently 14 Mio files separated into 140 Directories, each > containing 100000 files. The naming-scheme is simple: <id>.<extension>; so > directory 00000001 contains files 0.<someext> to 99999.<someext>, directory > 00000002 contains files 100000.<someext> to

Experts, (Now that I am able to run imap...) Here's what I am seeing with imap, it seems to die in the latest nightly. (tss, I am still trying to get dbx to work properly, maybe it won't, but I got some more details here.) ... 2 select "INBOX" * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft) * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft \*)] Flags permitted.

Hi guys, I'm having a problem rsyncing between two directories on local disk. I wish to sync the local directory /local/CA/eTrustDirectory/dxserver/ldif to the other local directory /local/CA/archive. 'rsync -vvvr --progress /local/CA/eTrustDirectory/dxserver/ldif /local/CA/archive' pauses at: make_file(4,ldif/MELLDRBIB11-ldsau004wm1/ldbau004v1_20060330.0204.raw)

Hello, i sync with imapsync from an archiopteryx-server to an dovecot-server, for testing until now. The dovecot is inside an VM. storage for mail is on an nfs-share, indexes are local. What i now see, is, on large folder( 58000 messages and more) the load on the imap-process is very high, and slowdown the transferprocess. Is there something, I can do. Whats cause the high load ind the

Apologies if this is a FAQ. We are saddled with some directories full of production image files that number in the hundreds of thousands to the millions. (Yes, I know this is bad.) They reside on a couple of Win 2003 boxes that are flaky and unreliable. I was hoping to copy them over to a Linux box running samba but it is taking forever. A strace on the smbd process receiving the files

We are setting up a Dovecot over a pair of NFS which mirrored with DRBD +Heartbeat, under Debian Etch AMD64 with Kernel 2.6.22-5. The problem was slow header downloading rate. We had tried to use postal to inject 500 emails which are under 5KB each, but when ever we start up Mail.app, Thunderbird or even OE6, the header download rate is terrible slow. Its look like a few sec for just 1

Hi out there, we have detected a bug in Samba-2.2.5, full details are in the attached files, but apparently the follwing snippet is the most important part of it: [common] comment = Common Tree Rev 1.3 path = /var/samba/common/%a msdfs root = true read only = no public = no browseable = yes

I was flipping through the code recently and noticed that we still have the double whammy of allocating dir entry positions with parent_dir->counter++ and that weird setting of f_pos to 2^31-1. So after enough creates (and deletes :)) in a directory we end up with an entry item whose key is past that value. f_pos gets rewound instead of being set to that magical EOF. readdir() gets stuck

Hi all, I have a problem with samba : I can create files, but can't create directories. The server has many shares, on seperated disks. We consider two of them : one 2Tb share and one share with more than 7Tb. Samba configuration is good, and works on many other servers, and on this one except for the large share. Permissions are correctly setted up too. I can read/write files and

Hi Jones, many thanks again four your help and your time. Thanks for the patch too - I'll check it up. On my Ubuntu, there is a Samba 4.1.6. I'll install the samba source package, and will try to apply the patch, then - I hope - the package will be compiled as well. I'll notify to you about the result. (First, I need to upgrade that server.) Thanks again, Ervin On Thu, Apr

Hi. I'm running Samba 2.2.2 and Linux 2.4.7 on a dual PPro-200/256KB server. The relevant NIC is an Intel EtherExpress PRO/100+. The problem I'm having is that certain programs will swamp the server; the load will spike immediately to 50% (i.e., 100% on one CPU) and performance will, naturally, bite. Having another active connection to the server at the same time causes _monster_

Hello all, First off, i''m talking about a SXDE build 89. Sorry if that was discussed here before, but i did not find anything related on the archives, and i think is a "weird" issue... If i try to remove a specific file, i got: # rm file1 rm: file1: No such file or directory # rm -rf dir2 rm: Unable to remove directory dir2: Directory not empty Take a look: ------- cut

Any suggestions where I should look? (Is this a known problem?) bash-2.05a$ unset MAIL bash-2.05a$ /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap * PREAUTH [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 SORT THREAD=REFERENCES MULTIAPPEND UNSELECT LITERAL+ IDLE CHILDREN LISTEXT LIST-SUBSCRIBED] Logged in as admin 001 select inbox * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft) * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen

Hello Timo, I have installed 1.1 beta 8 with fts-squat enabled. I have added the plugin section in dovecot.conf. How can I actually make use of the full text index? Regards, - Joe

I have a big problem. I've looked at a bunch of documentation, both for Windows 2000/NT4, and Samba, and I have yet to find a solution. Anyway, here's the problem. We have a Unix File Server with ~2.6tb of online storage, performance is great over NFS to other Unix machines. However, using Samba, I get terrible performance. Samba ends up eating almost an entire processor by itself