similar to: quota_warning bug?

Hi Everyone, I have a question regarding reverse quota_warnings. I'm building a new setup, and I would like to block sending messages if a person is over his/her quota limit. Although this can be accomplished using a quota_warning script, I can't find how to accomplish the reverse. Has anyone tried to do something like this? By looking at the source code: ---- quote ---- if

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.3.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.3.tar.gz.sig * dovecot-lda: Removed use of non-standard Envelope-To: header as a default for -a. Set lda_original_recipient_header=Envelope-To to returns the old behavior. + Added support for reverse quota warnings (i.e. when quota goes back under the limit). This is enabled by adding

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.3.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.3.tar.gz.sig * dovecot-lda: Removed use of non-standard Envelope-To: header as a default for -a. Set lda_original_recipient_header=Envelope-To to returns the old behavior. + Added support for reverse quota warnings (i.e. when quota goes back under the limit). This is enabled by adding

Hi, We've been using v1.0.5 +quota_warning patch, however quota_warning does't seem to be working properly. For example, in order to enable 80% over for quota warning, and we configured like following: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- plugin { quota_warning = storage=80%% /usr/local/path/to/plugin }

Hello all, I'm trying to get dovecot read three different quota_warnings values directly from ldap. I configured correctly the quota_rule value, know I'm trying to override this values: quota_warning = storage=95%% /usr/local/bin/quota-warning.sh 95 quota_warning2 = storage=80%% /usr/local/bin/quota-warning.sh 80 quota_warning3 = storage=70%% /usr/local/bin/quota-warning.sh 70 reading

Hi Chris, I've properly started looking into this yesterday. NSD definitely shouldn't crash, still working on that. However, the provided zone is invalid too(?) I'm not the foremost expert on NSEC3 (or even DNSSEC), but is seems an NSEC3 is missing for bar.foo.com. Empty non-terminals should still have an NSEC3 RR. (Of course, the delegation point should be at bar.foo.com. too and

Hi everybody, We use a Dovecot setup with GlusterFS. Dovecot 1.1.2 and GlusterFS 1.3.9. I enabled the following options (I don't have posix-locks translators): lock_method = dotlock dotlock_use_excl = no mmap_disable = yes mail_nfs_index = yes mail_nfs_storage = yes I receive the following error message. Aug 7 09:38:51 mta2 dovecot: POP3(somebody at domain.tld): nfs_flush_fcntl:

Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: > From: D Chen <dchenusa at yahoo.com> > Date: April 19, 2012 4:06:49 PM PDT > To: lists-dovecot <replies-lists-a1z2-dovecot at listmail.innovate.net> > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] IMAP SSL incoming test need help ! > Reply-To: D Chen <dchenusa at yahoo.com> > > Thanks for nice pointing out in my mail.log! >

Hi Sagar, Are you getting a particular error? Because the same method should work just fine in NSD. Simply open the corresponding zone file (as configured in nsd.conf) and put that line in there. Best regards, Jeroen Koekkoek On Fri, 2023-07-21 at 09:14 +0200, Sagar Acharya via nsd-users wrote: > How do I add SRV record to my zone file? > > Eg. In pdns I have > >

Hi Chris, I can reproduce with your zone. Thanks! Best, Jeroen On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 14:07 +0000, Chris LaVallee wrote: > > Hi Jeroen, > > > Attached is the zone I used. Did you add the record for a.bar ? > > > Ex: > > > a.bar ? 300 ? ? IN ?NS ? ? ?ns.somewhere.net. > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > >

Hi Jeroen, I just realised that the version I use is very old -- 4.1. So first what I should do -- updating it and only then come here , asking for clarification. ??, 27 ????. 2024??. ? 14:19, Jeroen Koekkoek <jeroen at nlnetlabs.nl>: > Hi Peter, > > NSD processes updates in batches. xfrd receives the [AI]XFR and > schedules a reload for the main process, which in turn forks

Jeroen Koekkoek via nsd-users <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> wrote: > Anand's answer is entirely correct. > > Once 4.8.0 is released, zone files will be written once per hour by > default. I'm confused now :-) Arnand said the "database" option is being removed. Does this mean the database will always be created, or NEVER be created? I always wondered why

Hi Jeroen, Attached is the zone I used. Did you add the record for a.bar ? Ex: a.bar 300 IN NS ns.somewhere.net. Chris ________________________________ From: Jeroen Koekkoek <jeroen at nlnetlabs.nl> Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2024 5:33 AM To: Chris LaVallee <clavallee at edg.io>; nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> Subject: Re:

i finally manage to control access on public folder by File system permission. i have 3 test users. 1. tom 2. fmaster 3 . testmail tom and fmaster are a group called "news-own" and testmail user is a readonly one. here is my folder structure ill share dovecot -n output at the end of this email. drwxrwxr-t 2 tom news-own 4.0K Dec 4 19:08 tmp drwxrwxr-t 2 tom news-own 4.0K Dec

On 17/07/2024 16:57, Jeroen Koekkoek wrote: Hi Jeroen, > That is indeed correct. At runtime the CPUID instruction is used to > detect which extensions are offered and it chooses based on that. When > compiling on x86_64 with SSE4.2 and AVX2 enabled, the binary will > actually contain 3 parsers, the most optimal one is used at runtime. Thanks for this clarification. NSD doesn't

I?m trying to migrate mdbox to maildir based on https://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration/MailFormat * Modified dovecot.conf and set mail_location=maildir:/tmp/destination/mailboxes/ * Then I had run /mnt/testmail/bin/dsync -Dv -u user at domain.com<mailto:user at domain.com> mirror mdbox:/source/mailboxes/user at domain.com<mailto:/source/mailboxes/user at domain.com> but that

Hello! I wrote perl script for read current quota usage, it works but when I run the program I receive a warning in Dovecot log: 2011-09-29 14:45:30 doveadm(guest at testmail.com): Warning: Timeout leak: 0x7f14800ad970 This is the script: =============================== #!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use Socket; use IO::Handle; socket(TSOCK, PF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM,0); connect(TSOCK,

Am 23.07.24 um 17:28 schrieb Jeroen Koekkoek via nsd-users: > NSD 4.10.1rc2 pre-release is available: no compile time warnings while building on debian bookworm/x86_64 > @bilias implemented mutual TLS authentication for zone transfers. > Please consult the nsd.conf manual for details on the newly introduced > configuration options tls-auth-port and tls-auth-xfr-only. this is an nice

Hi Anand, Doing it with "nsd -v" is not implemented right now because it's meant to be transparent to users of the library, but I think you're right and it'd be good to show the info. The kernel is selected when the parse function is called. For NSD it makes sense to select one on startup and always use that one. There's a GH issue for that:

I'm asking that what is the proper method to add SRV records. I read the documentation but I couldn't find anything around it. If you can perhaps add something which specifies how each and every type of record is to be written on documentation, that would be very useful. Thanking you Sagar Acharya https://humaaraartha.in 21 Jul 2023, 18:46 by jeroen at nlnetlabs.nl: > Hi Sagar,